Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

Scientists from around the world are providing even more evidence of global warming, one day after President Barack Obama renewed his call for climate legislation. Full Story
PHD

Overton, TX

#23676 Feb 5, 2013
It may seem that I'm brain dead but there is no doubt yours is. PS. Get that check up from the neck up you desperately need…
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#23677 Feb 5, 2013
PHD wrote:
It may seem that I'm brain dead but there is no doubt yours is. PS. Get that check up from the neck up you desperately need…
It may seem ....??? UNDERSTATEMENT !!! Sadly, you've used that old blather dozens of times, are you THAT SIMPLE ???
PHD

Overton, TX

#23678 Feb 5, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>It may seem ....??? UNDERSTATEMENT !!! Sadly, you've used that old blather dozens of times, are you THAT SIMPLE ???
Yes simple unlike you a simpleton.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#23679 Feb 5, 2013
Yes, you are both simple and a simpleton....
PHD

Overton, TX

#23680 Feb 5, 2013
That would be a got you again. Try something a little more creative. Your making yourself look silly again.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#23681 Feb 5, 2013
"You're" always there to make fun of, since you're incredibly DUMB !!! LMAOROTFU~! Nice "attempt" !!!
PHD

Overton, TX

#23682 Feb 5, 2013
Try something a little more creative. Your making yourself look silly again.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#23683 Feb 5, 2013
"You're" always there to make fun of, since you're incredibly DUMB !!! LMAOROTFU~! Nice "attempt" !!!

Your indicates possession. Is this your pencil?
You’re is the contraction of you are. You’re writing with a pencil.
PHD

Overton, TX

#23684 Feb 5, 2013
Try something a little more creative. Your making yourself look silly again. Your writing with your pencil head.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#23686 Feb 5, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
And how long is the historical record? Compare that to how long the earth has had a climate and you discover that we have only recorded a minor fraction. That research has discovered that the thawing perifrost is releasing CO2 and CH4. Which makes the rising CO2 level an effect and not a cause. Also, you forgot that plants also asorb CO2, and produce O2 in the process.
Yes, facts are facts. The CO2 levels in the Cambrian were higher and the world was lush with life. AGW was disproven in various studies and the reason why you no longer hear about it in the media where it is now called climate change. That many climate scientist have now disproved AGW with other studies.
AGW was actually disproved both scientifically and statistically.
Silly. We can study paleontologically going back billions of years. There's just more uncertainty when we use proxies of past climate. That doesn't mean we know nothing.

Silly again. CO2 is both an effect (especially initially with the Milankovitch cycles) AND a cause (later, & MUCH larger) of warming. The increased insolation with Milankovitch changes causes only slight warming; there must be positive feedbacks, including rising CO2, decreasing albedo as ice melts &, as warming continues, methane release. These feedbacks cause the vast majority of the warming we see during an interglacial.

Yes, CO2 levels were very high in the Cambrian, & probably had been so since they helped to break the last snowball earth event. However, the sun was ~4% dimmer then - BIG difference. Those things balanced out, making temps moderate.

AGW/CC has NEVER been "disproven," since more & more information over time has only verified the basic truth of the theory. It has made ~17-20 correct predictions, depending on how you count them.

Models are ALWAYS being adjusted to reflect new data, & this process has increased their accuracy over time.

Next time try linking actual science instead of the denier claptrap you always post.

Of course you can't link the NASA site you promised Wallop10 that "disproved" AGW/CC because it doesn't exist. All legitimate science organizations (with a few exceptions, like petroleum geologists, who are neutral) support the consensus on AGW/CC. More than 99.8% of scientific papers over the past 20 years support the consensus, less than 0.2% disbelieve it.

You'd get less consensus if you said "it's Tuesday" for goodness' sake. It's FAR beyond reasonable doubt that AGW/CC is correct.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#23687 Feb 5, 2013
cras ass wrote:
I use the "N" word all the time.
'cras ass' is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig, who is too scared to use the 'N' word. We have the slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener toxic topix AGW denier brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' ganghood, where all the worst slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener toxic topix AGW deniers hang out. Its crowded, but you'll fit right in like a jig saw puzzle piece.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#23688 Feb 5, 2013
I see SuxObama has made an appearance with his 8 pseudo logins.

Which means TOPIX allows his slimy cheating to go on.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#23689 Feb 5, 2013
Awwww, SubObama, decided to only use 7 of his pseudo logins.

C'mon, I wasn't worth the 8th one. I think you have more than 8 too.

See the appear all at once.
More than the combined total of almost all the other posts over weeks.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#23690 Feb 5, 2013
It would be easy to prove me wrong about the science. Show me one world renown science agency who says global warming is NOT man made and a threat.

Start here.

**Organizations that say AGW is a FACT**

* National Academy of Sciences, United States [and NAS of every country]
* National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA)
* National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
* National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
* National Science Foundation (NSF)
* American Institute of Physics (AIP)
* American Medical Association (AMA)
* Smithsonian Institution
* International Arctic Science Committee
* Arctic Council
* American Meteorological Society (AMS)
* American Physical Society (APS)
* U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
* U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
* The Royal Society of the United Kingdom
* Royal Meteorological Society, UK
* British Antarctic Survey
* European Science Foundation
* Chinese Academy of Sciences
* Académie des Sciences, France
* Institute of Biology, UK
* Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
* Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
* European Federation of Geologists
* European Geosciences Union
* European Physical Society
* U.S. Agency for International Development
* United States Department of Agriculture
* National Institute of Standards and Technology
* United States Department of Defense
* United States Department of Energy
* National Institutes of Health
* United States Department of State
* United States Department of Transportation
* University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
* African Academy of Sciences
* Australian Academy of Sciences
* Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences
and the Arts
* Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias
* Cameroon Academy of Sciences
* Royal Society of Canada
* Caribbean Academy of Sciences
* Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
* Indonesian Academy of Sciences
* Royal Irish Academy
* Accademia nazionale delle scienze of Italy
* Indian National Science Academy
* Science Council of Japan
* Kenya National Academy of Sciences
* Madagascar's National Academy of Arts,
* Letters and Sciences
* Academy of Sciences Malaysia
* Academia Mexicana de Ciencias
* Nigerian Academy of Sciences
* Royal Society of New Zealand
* Polish Academy of Sciences
* Russian Academy of Sciences
*l'Académie des Sciences et Techniques
du Sénégal
* Academy of Science of South Africa
* Sudan Academy of Sciences
* Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
* Tanzania Academy of Sciences
* Turkish Academy of Sciences
* Uganda National Academy of Sciences
* Zambia Academy of Sciences
* American Academy of Pediatrics
* American Association for the Advancement
of Science
* American Astronomical Society
* American Chemical Society
* American Geophysical Union
* American Institute of Biological Sciences
* American Society for Microbiology
* American Society of Plant Biologists
* American Statistical Association
* Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
* Botanical Society of America
* Crop Science Society of America
* Ecological Society of America
* Federation of American Scientists
* Geological Society of America
* National Association of Geoscience Teachers
* Natural Science Collections Alliance
* Organization of Biological Field Stations
* Society of American Foresters
* Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
* Society of Systematic Biologists
* Soil Science Society of America
* Australian Coral Reef Society
* Australian Medical Association
* Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
* Engineers Australia
* Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
* Geological Society of Australia
* International Association for Great Lakes Research
* International Union for Quaternary Research
* International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
* Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
* World Federation of Public Health Associations
* World Health Organization
* World Meteorological Organization
Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#23692 Feb 5, 2013
Earthling wrote:
<quoted text>Is that as far as you got?<quoted text>So you're another who correlates the IR with GW, but conveniently forgets that the end of the LIA coincided with it.
You're just another denier moron that conflates correlation and causation. Take a science class or shut up and let the grownups talk.
Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#23693 Feb 5, 2013
Owl Gore wrote:
Unlikely Skeptic: A Liberal Environmentalist Challenges Global Warming Theory
Dr. Denis Rancourt speaks to Marc Morano on his views on the politics and science of global warming. "They look to comfortable lies" says Rancourt with regard to global warming believers.
Typical denier confirmation bias and loony conspiracism. 2% of relevant scientists don't accept some portion of the consensus. Far fewer deny it's happening at all. Hell, 2% of any population are nutters of some sort. You gravitated to the. 01% of relevant scientists that's also conspiracy theorist wingnuts. While ignoring the 98% who ate on total agreement. Care to defend your choice of whom to believe?
Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#23694 Feb 5, 2013
Green Jihad Scam wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you hate plants? Pure bigotry and hatred. Shameful.
Congratulations for posting the most idiotic post of the day.
CRASSUS

Green Bay, WI

#23695 Feb 5, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
'cras ass' is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig, who is too scared to use the 'N' word. We have the slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener toxic topix AGW denier brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' ganghood, where all the worst slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener toxic topix AGW deniers hang out. Its crowded, but you'll fit right in like a jig saw puzzle piece.
Next time you show up here for lively discussion please clean the arse off of your lips. It's rude.
Kyle

Columbia City, IN

#23696 Feb 5, 2013
Joyce Bros wrote:
CO2 is as natural is inhaling and exhaling all day long and the plants love it.
Hasnt climategate proved this was all a big hoax, warming is much preferred to cooling anyway as the planet thrives with heat and crops do as well.
How stupid! Arsenic is all natural. Water is too but you can drown in it. Climate gate was quickly and repeatedly revealed to not mean anything at all like the deniers claimed it did. Apparently you're very selective in what propaganda you consume.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#23697 Feb 5, 2013
cras ass wrote:
Next time you show up here for lively discussion please clean the arse off of your lips. It's rude.
The first time Pres. Obama won election, the racists & threateners showed up at toxic topix AGW forums in force. Took a bit longer this time, but the racists & threateners are winding up now.

'cras ass' is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig, who is too scared to use the 'N' word. We have the slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener toxic topix AGW denier brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' ganghood, where all the worst slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener toxic topix AGW deniers hang out.

Its crowded, but you'll fit right in like a jig saw puzzle piece.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) 5 min LIbEralS 287
Burn Diss Place Down 2 hr Bob 7
The Parents Weren't at the Scene in Ferguson 21 hr Liberal Lover 2
Car plows through protesters during Ferguson ra... 22 hr Mama Brown 4
Ferguson rioters destroy businesses, police car... Wed Sqandered taxdollars 18
The Gentle Violent Giant Wed Sqandered taxdollars 2
Thousands in Minnesota join outcry over Ferguso... Wed Sqandered taxdollars 3
Minneapolis Dating
Find my Match

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:19 am PST

Bleacher Report 1:19AM
New England Patriots vs Green Bay Packers: Breaking Down Green Bay's Game Plan
Bleacher Report 3:15 AM
Patriots vs. Packers: Breaking Down New England's Game Plan
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Patriots vs. Packers: What Are Experts Saying About New England?
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
NFL Week 13 Picks: Final Predictions and Over-Under Odds Before Thursday Night
NBC Sports10:13 AM
Watch No. 12: Tom Brady vs Aaron Rodgers - NBC Sports