Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say

[litesong]

litesong wrote:
You're the one asking questions........ dumb & dudd ones, too.
//////////
phdudd wrote:
And your(sic) the one that can't answer any question.So(sic) answer the questions with your own work expert.
//////////
litesong wrote:
I have & you haven't understood, thinking yourself wise. However, you repeat variations on a theme (not even that, but reflections). You did it above. You'll probably answer with a reflection. You complain about my thinking, but then use my thoughts to reflect back.

I don't answer your questions because they are unworthy questions. AGW scientists have addressed all issues by toxic topix AGW deniers. Since I'm not your teacher, I like toxic topix AGW deniers to remain as stupid as they have chosen to be.

[Patriot AKA Bozo]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Cycles of warming and cooling with an overall warming trend. Of course that same general trend has been in progress for the last ten centuries.
Like I said you are thinking short term when it comes to climate change.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

[Amused Slew]

tina anne wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually it does add up to a college degree and a high school diploma.
And yes they teach various disciplines and each is considered an expert and highly knowledgeable in that discipline.

You posted 2 different number of "teachers", so NO, "it" doesn't....

[PHD]

The less than a Box of Rocks AKA "tina" makes the flip flopping politician look like K Level material. On the other hand when it comes to an education spot the dog makes the Less than a Box of Rocks AKA"tina" looks like a higher educated person.

[inbred Genius]

al gore said global warming was bad, then he got on his private jet and left

[PHD]

Was that jet an solar powered one?

[QuiteCrazy]

Geologists have already discovered, I dislike that word, that global warming is not unordinary to the planet. As they have concluded it has happened about seven times, five of which were documented by humans at the same time in different parts of the world. The glacial core also reinforces this occurence.

[Patriot AKA Bozo]

QuiteCrazy wrote:

Geologists have already discovered, I dislike that word, that global warming is not unordinary to the planet. As they have concluded it has happened about seven times, five of which were documented by humans at the same time in different parts of the world. The glacial core also reinforces this occurence.

Does that make it ok for us to alter the climate by dumping CO2 into the atmosphere?

[QuiteCrazy]

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Does that make it ok for us to alter the climate by dumping CO2 into the atmosphere?

I didn't say that Energizer Bunny. The green house effect and the depletion of the ozone layer are two contributing factors with ancient data that could not have been recorded. It could, although ignorant to presume that our current manner of exploiting the planet's natural resources in an fashion which humans had never before, attribute to this accelerated reaction.

[QuiteCrazy]

btw I didn't judge you

[Patriot AKA Bozo]

QuiteCrazy wrote:

<quoted text>
I didn't say that Energizer Bunny. The green house effect and the depletion of the ozone layer are two contributing factors with ancient data that could not have been recorded. It could, although ignorant to presume that our current manner of exploiting the planet's natural resources in an fashion which humans had never before, attribute to this accelerated reaction.

Understand. However, this is an argument that many use to diminish the role of CO2 in global warming. Just because the planet warmed in the past does in no way support that argument. There are many problems associated with the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere.

[frontporchreacti onary]

http://ecowatch.org/2012/fail-address-methane...

The Clean Air Act requires EPA to set emission controls—known as “New Source Performance Standards” or “NSPS”—for industrial sectors that cause or significantly contribute to air pollution that endangers public health and welfare. In August 2012, EPA revised NSPS regulations for the oil and natural gas industry. These regulations included, for the first time, federal air emission standards for natural gas wells developed through hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” along with requirements for several other sources of pollution in the oil and gas industry that are currently not regulated at the federal level.

However, the revised regulations do not address the industry’s methane emissions. In fact, although EPA concluded that its regulations would have “co-benefits” in reducing methane emissions, its decision not to directly address the emissions of methane from oil and natural gas operations leaves almost 95 percent of these emissions uncontrolled.

In today’s notice of intent to sue, Attorney General Schneiderman’s coalition charges that the EPA violated the Clean Air Act when it failed to address methane emissions in the August 2012 regulations. Specifically, the coalition argues that because EPA recognizes that methane endangers public health and welfare and is emitted in large quantities by the oil and gas industry—and has 18 years of data demonstrating that many methods of controlling these emissions are available and cost-effective—the Agency broke the law by deferring a decision on whether to set NSPS standards for methane emissions from the industry. The coalition’s notice states that it intends to file suit against EPA in federal district court, unless the Agency makes timely decisions on setting standards to curb these methane emissions from the oil and gas industry.

[QuiteCrazy]

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Understand. However, this is an argument that many use to diminish the role of CO2 in global warming. Just because the planet warmed in the past does in no way support that argument. There are many problems associated with the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere.

Definately not using that as a discussion point to defend or express my opinion. I only believe that the factor that you mentioned and previous records would validate for this "warm climate" happening drastically faster or ahead of schedule.

If there is a better and more effect way to live and use energy we definately can develop it and use it.

[QuiteCrazy]

buh bye bunny
continue to save the world, no jk

[Fair Game]

QuiteCrazy wrote:

Geologists have already discovered, I dislike that word, that global warming is not unordinary to the planet. As they have concluded it has happened about seven times, five of which were documented by humans at the same time in different parts of the world. The glacial core also reinforces this occurence.

They have also documented what happened during these warming periods:

http://www.greenmanstudio.com/wardco2big.jpg

Extinction events, where many species are simply wiped off the planet.

The Earth will be fine- it's just us who are in trouble.

[PHD]

Yes during the warm periods my heat exchanger is turned off. That’s global warming turning into global cooling.

[tina anne]

Amused Slew wrote:

<quoted text>You posted 2 different number of "teachers", so NO, "it" doesn't....

And I am still taking courses so of course the numbers are changing and the number of professor is increasing.

[tina anne]

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...

A graph with nothing telling us what they used for data, how they calculated, or anything else.

As Mark Twain said, "There are three types of lies. Lies, damm lies, and statistics." What you have isn't even statistics.

[Amused Slew]

Too bad it's too few, to support your claim/lies... Poor tina, keep spinning and you'll get dizzier.

[CrazyasUR]

Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:

<quoted text>
Does that make it ok for us to alter the climate by dumping CO2 into the atmosphere?

And you have electricity to promote your propaganda by what means? Go outside and pulled the meter off your house hypocrite.