Pine County sheriff ‘will not enforce...

Pine County sheriff ‘will not enforce’ further federal gun regulations

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#1 Jan 16, 2013
On a day when President Obama was preparing a slate of proposals to stem gun violence in America, Pine County Sheriff Robin Cole said he would consider any new federal regulation on guns to be illegal and would “refuse to carry it out.”

http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/articl...
Not From Iowa

Saint Paul, MN

#2 Jan 16, 2013
So it's the role of law enforcement to interpret legislation now? Only a treasonous tea bagger would take comfort in the idea.

If you are so taken with the concept of local war lords setting policy there are parts of the world you would "feel' comfortable, just not here.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#3 Jan 16, 2013
The Totalitarian Fascist that "Feels" like the King is overseeing the 2nd American Revolution.

The Son of Communists had the 20% who are the Dependent Sheeple Re-Erect him. The other 80% who are American Citizens WILL NOT allow this Son of Communists to prevail.

You Sheeple that are the Low Information Americans are about to get an education.

WE let you "Feel" like you had a legitimate though, and WE Messed up sustaining you.

The "Correction" is coming.

You Greedy Pigs that seek your place at the trough via your Messiah, no longer get to hurt my Children and Grandchildren . The Sociopath in Newtown hurt 100's of children.......You Narcissistic Demokrats hurt MILLIONS of children.

How will my Grandson "Pay off" his share of Obama's Debt?....On the day he is born he will be ENSLAVED to the tune of about $150,000 because of what you pigs did in electing/re-electing your King Barry.

Now, ask me if it is Tyranny to ENSLAVE my unborn Grandson?

Ask me if the best check on Tyranny is "The peoples right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".

Be afraid Sheeple, be VERY afraid!
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#4 Jan 16, 2013
Not From Iowa wrote:
So it's the role of law enforcement to interpret legislation now? Only a treasonous tea bagger would take comfort in the idea.
If you are so taken with the concept of local war lords setting policy there are parts of the world you would "feel' comfortable, just not here.
Only an Low Information Amerikan of your ilk would call the Patriotic Acts of Citizens of the Constitutional Republic "Treason".

"Treason" is what The Son of Communists was hired to commit by the Chicago Mob.

You needed to be "Thankful" for all those that sacrifice, instead you Sheeple "feel" entitled.

It is over son, Barry Soetoro's Handlers finally reached to far.

If you could formulate a thought I would ask you:

Who is it that will rise up against the people the "enforce" the unconstitutional acts of a Tyrannical Imperial Messiah?

The best of us wear the uniforms.....Police, Military, Sheriffs.

Barry may have been able to cut the head off a few Generals in his Benghazi Cover-up, but these Generals were just the 1st shots fired by the Treasonous Demokrat Victims Party and your Messiah, not even a battle.

The people will prevail. Hopefully it will be by Impeachment, and the other Constitutional remedies will not be needed.

By the way......YOU FAUCHING REPUBLICAN POLITICIANS BETTER GROW SOME BALLS!
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#5 Jan 16, 2013
Not From Iowa wrote:
So it's the role of law enforcement to interpret legislation now? Only a treasonous tea bagger would take comfort in the idea.
If you are so taken with the concept of local war lords setting policy there are parts of the world you would "feel' comfortable, just not here.
Just like all those treasonous CA and WA police who don't enforce federal drug laws? You do realize that it is not the police's job to enforce federal laws?
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#6 Jan 16, 2013
I am still waiting or the gun nuts/NRA members to start slamming bush... for using an executive order to ban assault weapons.

crickets ???

So, you believe in state's rights when it suit you, right hypocrite ???
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#7 Jan 16, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I am still waiting or the gun nuts/NRA members to start slamming bush... for using an executive order to ban assault weapons.
crickets ???
So, you believe in state's rights when it suit you, right hypocrite ???
Odd, I just look on the White House’s web site at all EO issued by Bush 1 and Bush 2 and I could not find one of them issuing a ban on assault weapons. Do you have the EO number?
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#8 Jan 16, 2013
I have nothing for you...Odd, you lie and then ask me favors ???
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#9 Jan 16, 2013
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
Odd, I just look on the White House’s web site at all EO issued by Bush 1 and Bush 2 and I could not find one of them issuing a ban on assault weapons. Do you have the EO number?
If he can't find it on the regular sites, I am sure it is in the urban dictionary somewhere.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#10 Jan 16, 2013
Poor non-sense, should I should put it there and then quote it like a POS liar ??? Have another "Guiness", stupid, scary, sand, suck*ss !! LMAOROTFU~!
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#11 Jan 16, 2013
In 1989, then President George H.W. Bush issued an executive order halting the importation of some semi-automatic firearms after a mass school shooting Stockton, California. He based his executive order on the 1968 Gun Control Act and used it to ban the shipment of what could be considered “assault weapons” unless they were used for sporting purposes,,

Pretty sad, you didn't look.
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#12 Jan 16, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I have nothing for you...Odd, you lie and then ask me favors ???
Who’s asking you for a favor? You said Bush made an EO banning assault weapons, and I just told you that EO is not listed on white house’s list of EO.

http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/ne...
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#13 Jan 16, 2013
Read above... Pretty sad, you're attempting to argue minutia and you're wrong.... even then...Te--roll...
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#14 Jan 16, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Read above... Pretty sad, you're attempting to argue minutia and you're wrong.... even then...Te--roll...
So you admit he did not ban them, he placed temporary ban on the import of foreign made ones only.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#15 Jan 16, 2013
Did you just write ban ??? Pretty sad, you're attempting to argue minutia and you're wrong.... even then...Te--roll...
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#16 Jan 16, 2013
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit he did not ban them, he placed temporary ban on the import of foreign made ones only.
Slewsie, when proven wrong, admits nothing and turns to insults and poorly worded phrases. Brace yourself for the mediocre onslaught.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#17 Jan 16, 2013
Poor child, I wrote ban and there was a ban, so you deflect, divert, and deny...

I am still waiting or the gun nuts/NRA members to start slamming bush... for using an executive order to ban assault weapons.

crickets ???

So, you believe in state's rights when it suit you, right hypocrite ???
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#18 Jan 16, 2013
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
So you admit he did not ban them, he placed temporary ban on the import of foreign made ones only.
See, the mediocre onslaught has begun........
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#19 Jan 16, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Poor child, I wrote ban and there was a ban, so you deflect, divert, and deny...
I am still waiting or the gun nuts/NRA members to start slamming bush... for using an executive order to ban assault weapons.
crickets ???
So, you believe in state's rights when it suit you, right hypocrite ???
It was not an assault weapon ban. It had no impact on the sale or ownership, and just a 90 day ban on importing semi-automatic rifles.

P.S. The NRA did take action over this; I'll let you figure out what.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#20 Jan 16, 2013
Onslaught ??? I'm so sorry you're wrong, so you're attempting to argue minutia and playing the divert game...

Sure do care about the subject, huh ?? LMAOROTFU~!

I am still waiting or the gun nuts/NRA members to start slamming bush... for using an executive order to ban assault weapons.

crickets ???

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Minneapolis Anti Trump Hotline 2 hr Cat Man 88
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 19 hr WHAT 36,946
The Ban Is On!!! 20 hr Space ace 2
Minimum Wage Fee (Aug '14) 21 hr LIbEralS 55
Gays ruining sunday Mon Hillary Lost 10
Homeless are bums Mon Davycrockett 7
Admit they are evil Sun Defeat maxine War... 36

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages