New York City May Raise Age to Buy Tobacco

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

1776 Defender

Ankeny, IA

#1 Apr 22, 2013
New York City May Raise Age to Buy Tobacco

The age to legally buy cigarettes in New York City would rise to 21 from 18 under a proposal that officials unveiled on Monday, a measure that would give New York the strictest limits of any major American city.

The proposal would make the age for buying cigarettes and other tobacco products the same as for purchasing liquor, but it would not prohibit people under 21 from possessing or even smoking cigarettes.

It is the latest effort in a persistent campaign to curb smoking that began soon after Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg took office, with bans on smoking in restaurants and bars that expanded more recently to parks, beaches, plazas and other public places.

But this latest proposal, announced by Dr. Thomas A. Farley, the city’s health commissioner, and Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker and a mayoral candidate, puts New York squarely into the middle of a debate over the rights and responsibilities of young people, and it drew much skepticism. At 18, New Yorkers are old enough to fight in wars, to drive and to vote, but if the smoking restriction passed they would be prohibited from deciding whether to take the risk of smoking.

Ms. Quinn and Dr. Farley defended the proposal, saying that people typically make the transition from experimental smoking to regular smoking around age 20, and that by making cigarettes harder to obtain at a young age the city would make it less likely that people would become lifelong addicts.

“With this legislation, we’ll be targeting the age group at which the overwhelming majority of smokers start,” Ms. Quinn said in announcing the legislation at a City Hall news conference.

While officials focused on the public health aspect of the age limitation, the announcement was also infused with political overtones. In the past, Mr. Bloomberg had always been on hand, standing in front of television cameras to boldly promote public health initiatives. But on Monday he was nowhere to be seen, allowing Dr. Farley to represent the administration and seemingly ceding the spotlight to Ms. Quinn, who initiated the proposal.

By proposing the legislation, Ms. Quinn, a Democrat who polls show is a leading candidate to succeed Mr. Bloomberg, appeared to be positioning herself to follow in his footsteps as a mayor who would make public health a top priority.

Mr. Bloomberg, in fact, had opposed a similar measure in 2006, arguing that raising the age to buy cigarettes would actually make smoking more enticing to teenagers. But he now believes differently, a spokeswoman said, because the city’s youth smoking rate has plateaued and recent research has suggested a correlation between a higher smoking age and lower smoking rates.

In interviews, many New Yorkers were largely critical of the proposal, viewing it as an attack on the maturity and self-determination of young people.
prohibition

Ankeny, IA

#3 Apr 22, 2013
Lets bring back prohibition while we're at it
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#5 Apr 22, 2013
Feel free to pay smoker's health care costs...Oxygen is EXPENSIVE....
The Only Way

Saint Paul, MN

#7 Apr 23, 2013
The Government has to close the Tobacco Companies down. People will not stop smoking until they do. They should stop complaining if they are not willing to close them.

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#8 Apr 23, 2013
The continuing rise of the nanny state in NY. And typical of left wingers, a law with no actual accountability. Bloomberg is a health nazi. Apparently he is grooming the next nazi.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#9 Apr 23, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
The continuing rise of the nanny state in NY. And typical of left wingers, a law with no actual accountability. Bloomberg is a health nazi. Apparently he is grooming the next nazi.
A common edict in Amerikan Court Rooms is;

"Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse!"

Who is enriched by the creation of Laws, by Lawyer Politicians?

Yes we have a BINGO!

Lawyers that leech off their neighbors, are the only citizens that benefit from the creation of Laws.

Just heard a story on the Radio this AM about a Milwaukee Police Officer (Homosexual), who would pull over Black Men for obscure reasons (Based on the Law of course!), and he would "Digitally Examine" the Law Breakers checking for any Law Breaking "Objects" that may be in the Black Mans Rectum.

His Lawyer (Union Provided?), and the Lawyer Prosecutor, met with the Lawyer Judge, and the Homosexual Cop was able to "plead" to Misdemeanors, and the Sexual Predators charges were dropped.....He will not be a registered Sex Offender.

Who benefits from "Laws"?
Bushwacked

Minneapolis, MN

#10 Apr 23, 2013
Will GIs be allowed to smoke if under 21?

Smokers suffer but the product is legal and for the most part only hurt those who use it.

Alcohol on the other hand kills thousands each year, why not ban booze?

Oh that's right banning booze was attempted and failed. So why attempt to stop usage of anything, especially when smoking pot has just been legalized in some states?

The USA is confused!!
1776 Defender

Ankeny, IA

#11 Apr 23, 2013
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
A common edict in Amerikan Court Rooms is;
"Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse!"
Who is enriched by the creation of Laws, by Lawyer Politicians?
Yes we have a BINGO!
Lawyers that leech off their neighbors, are the only citizens that benefit from the creation of Laws.
Just heard a story on the Radio this AM about a Milwaukee Police Officer (Homosexual), who would pull over Black Men for obscure reasons (Based on the Law of course!), and he would "Digitally Examine" the Law Breakers checking for any Law Breaking "Objects" that may be in the Black Mans Rectum.
His Lawyer (Union Provided?), and the Lawyer Prosecutor, met with the Lawyer Judge, and the Homosexual Cop was able to "plead" to Misdemeanors, and the Sexual Predators charges were dropped.....He will not be a registered Sex Offender.
Who benefits from "Laws"?
Redeemer is getting on the greyhound right now!
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#12 Apr 23, 2013
1776 Defender wrote:
<quoted text>
Redeemer is getting on the greyhound right now!
I thought that I saw a "Black Streak" across the window....That was Red rushing to the "action" eh?

Gawd I hope Slewsie does not get jealous......Psychotics ain't pretty when they are pissed!....They seem to repeat themselves repeatedly.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Parents Weren't at the Scene in Ferguson 2 hr Liberal Lover 2
Car plows through protesters during Ferguson ra... 3 hr Mama Brown 4
Burn Diss Place Down 4 hr Sqandered taxdollars 6
Ferguson rioters destroy businesses, police car... 4 hr Sqandered taxdollars 18
The Gentle Violent Giant 4 hr Sqandered taxdollars 2
Thousands in Minnesota join outcry over Ferguso... 4 hr Sqandered taxdollars 3
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 5 hr Earthling-1 33,280
Minneapolis Dating
Find my Match

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:53 am PST

Bleacher Report 9:53AM
Patriots vs. Packers Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
NBC Sports11:25 AM
Simplify the Game: Pats must play keep-away with Packers
NFL11:52 AM
One Preview: Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers finally square off
NBC Sports 1:16 PM
In Vikings vs. Panthers, Munnerlyn will be 'edgy' - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 2:00 PM
Ryan Kalil says his brother's hat-flick was all his fault