Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#22 Jan 10, 2013
Another insightful posting from the no integrity poster, non-sense. You are a slew-in for slewche of the year.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#23 Jan 10, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Another insightful posting from the no integrity poster, non-sense. You are a slew-in for slewche of the year.
Glad to see you giving in to the new terminology inspired by your slewy posts and slewpidity. What is your retort when someone copies your post and uses it back on you? Good one mr low integrity poster, once again you fall on both sides after criticizing one method, adopting it later. Low integrity, low information, slewche of the year is a shoo-in for you.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#24 Jan 10, 2013
There your new words, not mine, sweetie. I'm not into baby talk... LMAOROTFU~! Typical non-sense "facts"... Poor baby, is your nose brown enough to suit you ???
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#25 Jan 10, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
There your new words, not mine, sweetie. I'm not into baby talk... LMAOROTFU~! Typical non-sense "facts"... Poor baby, is your nose brown enough to suit you ???
Really, "there" my words mr low integrity poster? I think they only came into being because of you..........thanks for adding some more descriptive terms to the lexicon to describe your blogging abilities.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#26 Jan 10, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
There your new words, not mine, sweetie. I'm not into baby talk... LMAOROTFU~! Typical non-sense "facts"... Poor baby, is your nose brown enough to suit you ???
Narcissistic Sociopath,

"There your new words"

"They,re"

The very least you could do,(even as a Pathological Defective Dependent), is to use the Spell Check/Grammar Feature on that Computer which the American Taxpayers had their money stolen, to give you that computer!

What a waste of oxygen!
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#27 Jan 10, 2013
You don't think, you make up words and prance like a 6 year old... LMAOROTFU~! Have a "Guiness" to celebrate...
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#29 Jan 10, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
You don't think, you make up words and prance like a 6 year old... LMAOROTFU~! Have a "Guiness" to celebrate...
Really, "there" my words mr low integrity poster? I think they only came into being because of you..........thanks for adding some more descriptive terms to the lexicon to describe your blogging abilities.

I can't take credit for "slewche" from April 2011, and "slewy", from 2007. After all, they are from your approved source, one you trust more than Webster's and Wikipedia.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#30 Jan 10, 2013
You don't think, you make up words and prance like a 6 year old... LMAOROTFU~! Have a "Guiness" to celebrate...take a trip to your "Conneticut" ....

Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#31 Jan 10, 2013
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
Narcissistic Sociopath,
"There your new words"
"They,re"
The very least you could do,(even as a Pathological Defective Dependent), is to use the Spell Check/Grammar Feature on that Computer which the American Taxpayers had their money stolen, to give you that computer!
What a waste of oxygen!
It isn't they're ?? Thanks drunken con, I'll be sure to remember all your drunken "spelling" tips...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#32 Jan 10, 2013
Guy who "uses" slewsie, criticizes spelling ?? Yep, you're NOT a stupid hypocrite, you're not, you're not, you're not..... LMAOROTFU~!

Ps-

"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#33 Jan 10, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Guy who "uses" slewsie, criticizes spelling ?? Yep, you're NOT a stupid hypocrite, you're not, you're not, you're not..... LMAOROTFU~!
Ps-
"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
post script, those lines and explanations are from the urban dictionary, the same place "slewy", "slewpid", "slewsie", and "slewche" are defined. Glad you accept the validity of the source you have chosen to use over admitting you were wrong on so many things. mr low integrity poster, too slewpid to back down.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#34 Jan 10, 2013
Man, you're wrong again !!!

Guy who "uses" slewsie, criticizes spelling ?? Yep, you're NOT a stupid hypocrite, you're not, you're not, you're not..... LMAOROTFU~!
Ps-
"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#35 Jan 10, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Man, you're wrong again !!!
Guy who "uses" slewsie, criticizes spelling ?? Yep, you're NOT a stupid hypocrite, you're not, you're not, you're not..... LMAOROTFU~!
Ps-
"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
Another unattributed definition. Slewsie is in your preferred source for definitions and spelling, the urban dictionary. mr low integrity poster with another useless critique.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#36 Jan 10, 2013
Tell me ALL ABOUT our Michigan bet, non-sense !!! LMAOROTFU~!

Naw, I like your "methods" of finding, not finding, THEN LYING !!! LMAOROTFU~!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#37 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Tell me ALL ABOUT our Michigan bet, non-sense !!! LMAOROTFU~!
Naw, I like your "methods" of finding, not finding, THEN LYING !!! LMAOROTFU~!
This post is near zero integrity, so close, but yet so far. It is amazing how low you can go mr low integrity poster. I think it is like a limit from calculus, as the slewche's posts approach infinity, the valuable content and/or integrity contained in said posts approaches zero. I am pretty sure this can be proven mathematically by some aspiring young mathemetician.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#38 Jan 11, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
<quoted text>
While I agree with your above statements, in the private sector, you pretty much can't fire someone for getting a DUI unless they are drunk on the job. Even then you have to offer them some kind of rehab option.(at least the first time around) So you can bet in the unionized public school system, one would need to be drunk, naked, on the front steps of the school during school hours, with a gun, having sex with a goat while surrounded by kiddie porn images. And even then it would probably only result in paid leave.
Zero tolerance policies are only in place for the students, like bringing a butter knife to school gets you expelled. Staff gets a different set of rules.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#39 Jan 11, 2013
The part I find interesting, although I did enjoy Can't's tirade, was the part where Education Minnesota actually used Emmer's DUI to rally the union bobos against him in the last Gov's race. Then stand by one of their own in this case. Who here among us doesn't believe Liberalism is a cancer!
Bridgework

Lincoln, NE

#40 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Man, you're wrong again !!!
Guy who "uses" slewsie, criticizes spelling ?? Yep, you're NOT a stupid hypocrite, you're not, you're not, you're not..... LMAOROTFU~!
Ps-
"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
There is no such word as shoe-in. Shoe-in is a common misspelling of shoo-in.

http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/shoe-in....

You also need to remember to stop posting the exact some things under your multiple names.

P.S. Your definition of shoo-in is also incorrect. You are using the origin of the word instead of its definition.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sho...
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/shoo-in

Maybe Yahoo answers isn't the best place to get your information?
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#41 Jan 11, 2013
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no such word as shoe-in. Shoe-in is a common misspelling of shoo-in.
http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/shoe-in....
You also need to remember to stop posting the exact some things under your multiple names.
P.S. Your definition of shoo-in is also incorrect. You are using the origin of the word instead of its definition.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sho...
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/shoo-in
Maybe Yahoo answers isn't the best place to get your information?
I got corrected by the slewy blogger. It seems that Webster's, Wikipedia, and the online free dictionary aren't good sources. The only source the slewche supports is the urban dictionary. They do have some good words, like slewy from 2007, slewche from April 2011, and slewsie and slewpid from Jan. 2013.

Take a look. Very descriptive of our resident slewche.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...
1. slewy

sloppy, screwy, careless writing

Don't ruin our paper with your slewy writing!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

1. Slewche

Someone who is being extremly slow or dumb.

Chae your a Slewche!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

2. slewsie

An idiot, dolt, someone who talks incessantly about things they are completely wrong about.

Wow, that Rachel Maddow is a real slewsie.

or

Wow, that Rush Limbaugh is a real slewsie.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...

1. slewpid

Noun: Dumb to the point of ignoring factual evidence rebutting an argument. Obstinately stupid.

Adjective: To make oneself appear incredibly uneducated and obtuse, either intentionally or unintentionally.

noun: The definition from Webster's right in front of him, he was too slewpid to ascertain the meaning.

adjective: The slewpid blogger didn't understand his posting invalidated his point.

mr low integrity poster has said this is his valid source for looking things up. At least we can see some of the basis for his delusions.

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#42 Jan 11, 2013
non-starter wrote:
<quoted text>This post is near zero integrity, so close, but yet so far. It is amazing how low you can go mr low integrity poster. I think it is like a limit from calculus, as the slewche's posts approach infinity, the valuable content and/or integrity contained in said posts approaches zero. I am pretty sure this can be proven mathematically by some aspiring young mathemetician.
So in theory they could eventually cancel each other out?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Obama Owns Ebola 25 min Guy Wiliford II 13
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 5 hr Earthling-1 32,963
Woman's head stepped on by Rand Paul supporters (Oct '10) 16 hr Bill 26,311
Twin Cities: lowest metro unemployment rate in US 17 hr Imma Gunna 20
Solargate, Obama donor goes bankrupt (Sep '11) 21 hr Billy 75
sext me!!! Sat ThisGuy19 1
free stuff Sat Space ace 3
Minneapolis Dating
Find my Match

Minneapolis Jobs

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]