liberal war on women
LIbEralS

Saint Paul, MN

#55 Apr 15, 2014
A proxy wrote:
<quoted text> But you get worked up when the welfare moms are funded by your tax dollars.
So what is your point?
LIbEralS

Saint Paul, MN

#56 Apr 15, 2014
cantmakeitup wrote:
<quoted text>
As well he should. In the 21st century, there is no excuse for getting pregnant accidentally. Numerous forms of birth control are available to make sure that doesn't happen. Men need to take more responsibility in that department, no question. But women, especially the ones on the public dole, need to take responsibility and say to their baby daddies...no glove, no love. Pretty sure most of those welfare moms have access to free birth control as well as free abortions. Abortion is not birth control. It's damage control.
And a pretty fair number of abortions do not involve welfare moms.
WHY would a welfare mom have an abortion?
LIbEralS

Minneapolis, MN

#57 Apr 30, 2014
CLASSIC "Do as I say, not as I do." Obama continues his war on women.

House Subpoenas Obama Officials Over Racial and Gender Discrimination Allegations:

A subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee voted unanimously on Tuesday to subpoena two Obama administration officials to probe allegations of racial and gender discrimination within the Consumer Financial Protection Board.

The Oversight and Investigations subcommittee voted to subpoena the two officials after it heard testimony earlier this month from a whistleblower, Angela Martin, who charged that the CFPB discriminates against women and minorities. That hearing followed a report from American Banker, which said CFPB managers “show a pattern of ranking white employees distinctly better than minorities in performance reviews used to grant raises and issue bonuses.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-e...
redeemer

Saint Paul, MN

#58 Apr 30, 2014
LIbEralS wrote:
CLASSIC "Do as I say, not as I do." Obama continues his war on women.
House Subpoenas Obama Officials Over Racial and Gender Discrimination Allegations:
A subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee voted unanimously on Tuesday to subpoena two Obama administration officials to probe allegations of racial and gender discrimination within the Consumer Financial Protection Board.
The Oversight and Investigations subcommittee voted to subpoena the two officials after it heard testimony earlier this month from a whistleblower, Angela Martin, who charged that the CFPB discriminates against women and minorities. That hearing followed a report from American Banker, which said CFPB managers “show a pattern of ranking white employees distinctly better than minorities in performance reviews used to grant raises and issue bonuses.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-e...
And you're getting no where fast,women know that the republicans are full of crap and all they want to do is to control their bodies and make there decisions on what they can or can not with their bodies, thanks Rush,your a pal how can we ever forget how you wanted to see Sandra Flute having sex.
Capt Crunch

Sedona, AZ

#59 Apr 30, 2014
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text> It's a war on women rights rights and that a fact and you know it deceiver.
And the sheep said Baaaaaaa!
redeemer

Saint Paul, MN

#60 Apr 30, 2014
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
And the sheep said Baaaaaaa!
And the Pagans worshipper' thought that drinking the blood of a young virgin girl would give external youth.
Capt Crunch

Sedona, AZ

#61 Apr 30, 2014
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text> And the Pagans worshipper' thought that drinking the blood of a young virgin girl would give external youth.
We're not discussing black religion here, so get back to the subject, if you can remember what it was.
LIbEralS

Minneapolis, MN

#62 May 1, 2014
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
We're not discussing black religion here, so get back to the subject, if you can remember what it was.
Deemer was trying to tell us that he spoke for all women... That is about as close to the subject as he will ever get.
Capt Crunch

Sedona, AZ

#63 May 12, 2014
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text> It's a war on women rights rights and that a fact and you know it deceiver.
If a man will date a sheep, why not a black woman?

Entry copied from a post on the Seattle Forum by someone called Seattle Slew. From a thread asking if white men dated black women.
Casey

Saint Paul, MN

#64 May 12, 2014
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
If a man will date a sheep, why not a black woman?
Entry copied from a post on the Seattle Forum by someone called Seattle Slew. From a thread asking if white men dated black women.
The Slew owns you does he/she not?

Knock knock. Who's there? The Slew Boo! Haha, got you!
Casey

Saint Paul, MN

#65 May 12, 2014
LIbEralS wrote:
<quoted text>
Deemer was trying to tell us that he spoke for all women... That is about as close to the subject as he will ever get.
Still with the judging your own posts? Somebody is crying for attention.
redeemer

Saint Paul, MN

#66 May 12, 2014
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
If a man will date a sheep, why not a black woman?
Entry copied from a post on the Seattle Forum by someone called Seattle Slew. From a thread asking if white men dated black women.
The white men who date black women,they never go back to white women,just ask the owner of the Clippers hummm you cruncie could only get get a date with a Pig.
Capt Crunch

Sedona, AZ

#67 May 13, 2014
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text> The white men who date black women,they never go back to white women,just ask the owner of the Clippers hummm you cruncie could only get get a date with a Pig.
A PIG? You mean like a Phony Italian Gut?> I don't do fa$$ots.
anti obiden

Minneapolis, MN

#69 May 13, 2014
Bushwhacker wrote:
A man speaks for them self, a child tries to hide behind others....
just look how the left organization ( NOW ) treated Sarah Palin. tax free status gone !
welcome back

Minneapolis, MN

#70 May 13, 2014
Bushwhacker wrote:
A man speaks for them self, a child tries to hide behind others....
hey creepy liberal girl, how is the view from your mom's s mpls basement?
redeemer

Saint Paul, MN

#71 May 14, 2014
Capt Crunch wrote:
<quoted text>
If a man will date a sheep, why not a black woman?
Entry copied from a post on the Seattle Forum by someone called Seattle Slew. From a thread asking if white men dated black women.
Once you go Black they never go back,darker the berry sweeter the juice.
Capt Crunch

Sedona, AZ

#72 May 14, 2014
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text> Once you go Black they never go back,darker the berry sweeter the juice.
They can't go back to being white after getting dirty.
Beth

Minneapolis, MN

#74 May 15, 2014
LIbEralS

Minneapolis, MN

#75 May 15, 2014
Executive Editor of the New York Times is FIRED because she wants to be paid like a man!

Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs.“She confronted the top brass,” one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was “pushy,” a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect. Sulzberger is known to believe that the Times, as a financially beleaguered newspaper, needed to retreat on some of its generous pay and pension benefits; Abramson, who spent much of her career at the Wall Street Journal, had been at the Times for far fewer years than Keller, which accounted for some of the pension disparity. Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for the Times, said that Jill Abramson’s total compensation as executive editor “was directly comparable to Bill Keller’s”—though it was not actually the same. I was also told by another friend of Abramson’s that the pay gap with Keller was only closed after she complained.

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/currenc...
redeemer

Saint Paul, MN

#76 May 17, 2014
LIbEralS wrote:
Executive Editor of the New York Times is FIRED because she wants to be paid like a man!
Abramson discovered that her pay and her pension benefits as both executive editor and, before that, as managing editor were considerably less than the pay and pension benefits of Bill Keller, the male editor whom she replaced in both jobs.“She confronted the top brass,” one close associate said, and this may have fed into the management’s narrative that she was “pushy,” a characterization that, for many, has an inescapably gendered aspect. Sulzberger is known to believe that the Times, as a financially beleaguered newspaper, needed to retreat on some of its generous pay and pension benefits; Abramson, who spent much of her career at the Wall Street Journal, had been at the Times for far fewer years than Keller, which accounted for some of the pension disparity. Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for the Times, said that Jill Abramson’s total compensation as executive editor “was directly comparable to Bill Keller’s”—though it was not actually the same. I was also told by another friend of Abramson’s that the pay gap with Keller was only closed after she complained.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/currenc...
Even a broken clock is right twice a day!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
official endorsement 2 hr anarchist 1
BLM lies on a 0-4 losing streak 8 hr Joe Balls 22
News Purple Faith: Prince's Life as a Jehovah's Witness 15 hr truth 992
Trump does it again Sat anarchist 56
FOVR fascist past Fri anarchist 1
Boots On the Ground Guy from Minneapolis diddle... May 27 Joe Balls 6
FOVR assaults old women/children May 27 anarchist 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages