Gun not at fault for Belcher's acts

[Amused Slew]

Sou ??? Yeah, we NEED to respond to a moron, huh ? Naw, you're OUR best argument... As for the founding father's "argument", that was then, this is now.

[Amused Slew]

Bob Schmahl wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree. President Obama and the Democrats in the US Congress and Democrats in the various state legislatures should make amending the constitution, ie. revising the 2nd Amendment, a top priority until they get it changed.

If you agree, BOTH parties should fix your mess... Perhaps, dishonesty is ALL YOU KNOW, huh ???

[Bridgework]

Amused Slew wrote:

We know what it says and the situation/timing when it was written...Oddly enough, cars didn't exist, so your Corvair is irrelevant...(Ps-It was anyway!!)

Is car ownership a constitutional right?

[Bridgework]

Amused Slew wrote:

Sou ??? Yeah, we NEED to respond to a moron, huh ? Naw, you're OUR best argument... As for the founding father's "argument", that was then, this is now.

How many guns do you own again?

[Amused Slew]

Zero which have been used violently against another human, grasshopper... LMAOROTFU~!

[Amused Slew]

Bridgework wrote:

<quoted text>
Is car ownership a constitutional right?

Are the weapons guaranteed by the constitution the same ?? Gee, you're a MORON ~!

[Bob Schmahl]

DSM Local wrote:

<quoted text>
Sou you disagree with the founding fathers, why do you have a problem with those who founded this exceptional nation?

Try to keep up. If the Democrats attempted to revise the 2nd Amendment they would lose control of the White House and the congress for a generation. That is why I made the suggestion.

[Bridgework]

Amused Slew wrote:

Zero which have been used violently against another human, grasshopper... LMAOROTFU~!

A few months ago didn't you respond about ID required to buy guns sayingn that you have bought guns from people with out an ID? Were you lying then or are you lying now?

[Cloud 9]

Bob Schmahl wrote:

<quoted text>
There are already laws against the mentally ill and felons from owning guns.

When effective laws are enacted to prevent felons and mentally ill from owning a weapon of any kind then crime will go down.

Until that time I will own a gun that will allow me to shoot someone with a dangerous weapon defending myself!

If you can't understand that YOU shouldn't own a dangerous weapon.

[Bob Schmahl]

Cloud 9 wrote:

<quoted text>
When effective laws are enacted to prevent felons and mentally ill from owning a weapon of any kind then crime will go down.
Until that time I will own a gun that will allow me to shoot someone with a dangerous weapon defending myself!
If you can't understand that YOU shouldn't own a dangerous weapon.

Huh? Laws are for the law abiding. There is not a law that will stop a felon or a mentally ill from acquiring a gun.

[Amused Slew]

Bridgework wrote:

<quoted text>
A few months ago didn't you respond about ID required to buy guns sayingn that you have bought guns from people with out an ID? Were you lying then or are you lying now?

Seems you're "sayingn" something difference, but equally stupid...normal for you.... I rarely use ID, because I know people I do business with...YOU need it because you look as dishonest as your posts.

[Cloud 9]

Bob Schmahl wrote:

<quoted text>
Huh? Laws are for the law abiding. There is not a law that will stop a felon or a mentally ill from acquiring a gun.

Exactlly.

OR a different weapon if a gun isn't available.

If you review a gun application it asks abour your criminal history and mental history. Additionaly a background check is performed when buying a gun.

BTW, there is no background check if you buy: knives, box cutters, explosives, cars, trucks, a match, poisen, alcohol, fire crackers/explosives, IED components, flameable liquids, clubs, baseball bats, rental truck and a long list of other dangerous weapons.

[cantmakeitup]

Bridgework wrote:

<quoted text>
A few months ago didn't you respond about ID required to buy guns sayingn that you have bought guns from people with out an ID? Were you lying then or are you lying now?

Probably lying on both occasions. It's hard to keep all of the lies straight when one is like that.

Owner of guns bought without ID from “friends”, plus anti-gun nut, plus gun banning anti-second amendment advocate = hypocrite.

[Bridgework]

Amused Slew wrote:

<quoted text>Seems you're "sayingn" something difference, but equally stupid...normal for you.... I rarely use ID, because I know people I do business with...YOU need it because you look as dishonest as your posts.

Did you or did you not buy guns? Which post was a lie?

[Amused Slew]

There's currently not a law, which is a good argument for passing one.... Poor morons, pretending you can use another weapon to kill AS WELL AS A GUN ??? Of course, Mitt wonders why we don't have more bayonets, FOR SNIPER WORK, right ???

[cantmakeitup]

Smart Liberal wrote:

<quoted text>
Correction...the US Constitution let him have access to the gun. Stupid people like you have no clue what the Contitution actually says or does.

And the Constitution,(just like the NRA and the Republicans), are not the ones who pulled the trigger. Only the shooter is truly responsible for his actions. Whether he used a gun, a bat, a knife or a pogo stick. He chose to commit murder.

[DSM Local]

cantmakeitup wrote:

<quoted text>
And the Constitution,(just like the NRA and the Republicans), are not the ones who pulled the trigger. Only the shooter is truly responsible for his actions. Whether he used a gun, a bat, a knife or a pogo stick. He chose to commit murder.

At leftist convention it was said we all belong to government, thus the government decides what people do and don't do, therefore if someone is allowed to "lose control" once in a while and go to a therapist and has access to guns what do you think happens in leftie world... Liberals are responsible for almost every mass shooting in the U.S. yet they shrink responsibility... The left is incompetent and needs us to suffer so they can't hurt each other any more because Batman was too conservative

[Amused Slew]

Not liberals, LOSER...We'd make stiffer gun laws..

[Bridgework]

Amused Slew wrote:

Not liberals, LOSER...We'd make stiffer gun laws..

You would make it more illegal to shoot somebody? Maybe make it more illegal for a criminal to have one?

[Amused Slew]

Poor troll, I'd start with gun locks, safes, and ammo restrictions.... Please continue to lie, it's so YOU ! LMAOROTFU~! What's not you is smart or manly...