Growing clamor for Obama to visit Chicago, address city's violence

[liberalism is a disease]

conservative crapola wrote:

<quoted text>
What do those rassmussen and dick morris numbers say?
AUbama cry-a-thon: Day 93
bwahahahahahahahahahahaha

remember liberal lisa - 59 million LEGAL voters did not vote for a muslim, you have your dictator and the Concervative base will blame all things BAD on barry soetoro, just watch the boy muslim destroy America.

[liberalism is a disease]

Amused Slew wrote:

Teabagger truth= Stories and "thier" own stupid "spelling".
You lost the election and your marbles, quit playing games, loser ! LMAOROTFU~!

correction liberal - AMERICA LOST THE ELECTION, barry is in the lame duck mode of destroying America.

[Amused Slew]

Hey diseased,

Gandhi is a bad man, just look at the name, right "logic" guy ?

[liberalism is a disease]

Amused Slew wrote:

Hey diseased,
Gandhi is a bad man, just look at the name, right "logic" guy ?

we almost feel sorry for your lack of education / judgement .... NOT !

[Amused Slew]

Tell your pocket mouse hello, little "man".

[au contraire]

Amused Slew wrote:

Tell your pocket mouse hello, little "man".

ah, the voice of experience.

[Amused Slew]

Ah, the post of unoriginality... LMAOROTFU~! Gotta be a wing nut, the way you stole my line.

[au contraire]

Amused Slew wrote:

Ah, the post of unoriginality... LMAOROTFU~! Gotta be a wing nut, the way you stole my line.

Dereliction of Duty..........FOREEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEE

Sen. Lindsey Graham vowed Friday to hold President Obama "accountable" for his leadership on Benghazi, after the top two Defense Department leaders testified that they had just one conversation with Obama during the course of the Sept. 11 terror attack.

During testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said they spoke with Obama at 5 p.m. ET on Sept. 11 last year. They were both on the same call, and said it lasted about 30 minutes.

Dempsey said they did not speak again until the attack was over.

Graham, who had demanded that Panetta testify on Libya as a condition for allowing the nomination of Chuck Hagel to proceed, aggressively questioned both witnesses on the president's actions.

Graham wrote on his Twitter account Friday: "President Obama has to account for his leadership on #Benghazi and I intend it hold him accountable."

He said Thursday on Fox News that "thus far the White House has delayed, denied, deceived and stonewalled and this has to come to an end. He has to account for his leadership."

During the hearing, Graham questioned why there weren't subsequent follow-up conversations with the president.

"It lasted almost eight hours ... did the president show any curiosity?" Graham asked.

Panetta said there was "no question" Obama "was concerned about American lives."

"With all due respect," Graham responded, "I don't believe that's a credible statement if he never called and asked you,'are we helping these people?'"

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/08/pa...

[Niether of the Above]

au contraire wrote:

<quoted text>Dereliction of Duty..........FOREEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEE
Sen. Lindsey Graham vowed Friday to hold President Obama "accountable" for his leadership on Benghazi, after the top two Defense Department leaders testified that they had just one conversation with Obama during the course of the Sept. 11 terror attack.
During testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said they spoke with Obama at 5 p.m. ET on Sept. 11 last year. They were both on the same call, and said it lasted about 30 minutes.
Dempsey said they did not speak again until the attack was over.
Graham, who had demanded that Panetta testify on Libya as a condition for allowing the nomination of Chuck Hagel to proceed, aggressively questioned both witnesses on the president's actions.
Graham wrote on his Twitter account Friday: "President Obama has to account for his leadership on #Benghazi and I intend it hold him accountable."
He said Thursday on Fox News that "thus far the White House has delayed, denied, deceived and stonewalled and this has to come to an end. He has to account for his leadership."
During the hearing, Graham questioned why there weren't subsequent follow-up conversations with the president.
"It lasted almost eight hours ... did the president show any curiosity?" Graham asked.
Panetta said there was "no question" Obama "was concerned about American lives."
"With all due respect," Graham responded, "I don't believe that's a credible statement if he never called and asked you,'are we helping these people?'"
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/08/pa...

Wait a minute,,,, Hillary and Barack, on 60 minutes never mentioned any of this! Hillary never said anything bout the lack of the Presidents involvement and infact, implied he was very involved. I am surprised this information was delayed until way after the election. It is alway easier to ask for forgiveness than it is for permission, and apparently, once again the liberal media, in their thirst for the truth, just didn't ask the right person the right question! I think Congress should drag HIllary's ass back before the House Foreign Relations committee!

[Smart Liberal]

Niether of the Above wrote:

<quoted text>Wait a minute,,,, Hillary and Barack, on 60 minutes never mentioned any of this! Hillary never said anything bout the lack of the Presidents involvement and infact, implied he was very involved. I am surprised this information was delayed until way after the election. It is alway easier to ask for forgiveness than it is for permission, and apparently, once again the liberal media, in their thirst for the truth, just didn't ask the right person the right question! I think Congress should drag HIllary's ass back before the House Foreign Relations committee!

The purpose of a free press is to hold the government accountable and to ask questions that make public the facts in cases like this.

When did we acquire a 4th Estate that is simply a cheerleader for a political party and that party's candidates?

[Amused Slew]

Now there is loud clamor for transparency and investigations, accusations of a cover-up and incompetence, with those doing the talking all the while professing to only want the truth as concerned Americans and conscientious politicians. Give me a break. The only conscientious concern here is self-serving partisan BS.

Where was all that concern for our men and women serving in embassies and consulates across the globe when all the other attacks and killings occurred?

Like in 2002 when the US Consulate in the Karachi, Pakistan, was attacked and 10 were killed?

Or in 2004 when the US embassy in Uzbekistan was attacked and two were killed and another nine injured?

How about in 2004, when the US Consulate in Saudi Arabia was stormed and 8 lost their lives?

There is more: In 2006, armed men attacked the US Embassy in Syria and one was murdered.

Then in 2007 a grenade was thrown at the US Embassy in Athens.

In 2008, the US Embassy in Serbia was set on fire.

In 2008, bombings in the US Embassy in Yemen killed 10.

Notice the dates, all before the Obama administration.

Not yet convinced that all the noise over Benghazi has nothing to do with love of countryman? How about the biggest, most catastrophic attack and murder of Americans? As a New Yorker, Sept. 11, 2001, is indelibly imprinted on my psyche and I’m sure on the rest of the country. 3,000 perished in the most brutal act of terror in our recent history—all under a Republican administration. George W. Bush and his team had nine warnings that al-Qaida would attack within the United States, but they did absolutely nothing. No one in that administration’s head rolled for that stunning incompetence.

But Republicans now want President Obama’s head for Benghazi.

Here is an excerpt from the Ninth Public Hearing of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, held Thursday April 8, 2004, where Bush adviser Condoleezza Rice, is being questioned:

MS. RICE: I remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the United States. He talked to people about this. But I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.

“MR. BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the Aug. 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB.

MS. RICE: I believe the title was "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States." Now, the PDB --

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.

Rice, in uncharacteristic obtuseness, for she is an academically brilliant and accomplished woman, gave the above unbelievable answer. We all now know they knew of imminent danger facing American citizens, but buried their head in the proverbial sand, ostrich style.

[Niether of the Above]

Smart Liberal wrote:

<quoted text>
The purpose of a free press is to hold the government accountable and to ask questions that make public the facts in cases like this.
When did we acquire a 4th Estate that is simply a cheerleader for a political party and that party's candidates?

The lack of accountablilty and the free pass they give this administration is so damn frustrating. They cruxified GWB, yet this guy not only get a free pass for incompetence, but also for, what appears to be a cover up and out right obstruction by the former Secretary of State to the United States Congress. She of all people should know, she was appointed, those questioning her were elected representative of the people. Extremely frustrating, and if they find out, neither Obama or Clinton's stories were true, it won't matter because the spin machine will make the Senators look like the ass holes

[Amused Slew]

Niether of the Above wrote:

<quoted text>The lack of accountablilty and the free pass they give this administration is so damn frustrating. They cruxified GWB, yet this guy not only get a free pass for incompetence, but also for, what appears to be a cover up and out right obstruction by the former Secretary of State to the United States Congress. She of all people should know, she was appointed, those questioning her were elected representative of the people. Extremely frustrating, and if they find out, neither Obama or Clinton's stories were true, it won't matter because the spin machine will make the Senators look like the ass holes

Not yet convinced that all the noise over Benghazi has nothing to do with love of countryman? How about the biggest, most catastrophic attack and murder of Americans? As a New Yorker, Sept. 11, 2001, is indelibly imprinted on my psyche and I’m sure on the rest of the country. 3,000 perished in the most brutal act of terror in our recent history—all under a Republican administration. George W. Bush and his team had nine warnings that al-Qaida would attack within the United States, but they did absolutely nothing. No one in that administration’s head rolled for that stunning incompetence.

[redeemer]

Full Truth wrote:

<quoted text>
Human Excrement,
Lemme quote another Adult that frequents this site....he put it well.
"I hope you die slowly and a very painful death. You deserve it."
You should thank Beelzebub your savior every night before Lock down that no man here can locate you!
I no longer have a speck of compassion for you because of the awful things your father did to your rectum. NOBODY is more deserving of an eternity of pain than you, NOBODY!
You should thank Beelzebub your savior every night before Lock down that no man here can locate you!

It must be happy hour!

[Amused Slew]

No "man" has tried very hard, I named a time & place... TWICE ~! LMAOROTFU~!

Hey red, is your gay bar population exploding ???

Just to watch con's antics is worth the cover !!

[Bluntforce]

Amused Slew wrote:

Teabagger truth= Stories and "thier" own stupid "spelling".
You lost the election and your marbles, quit playing games, loser ! LMAOROTFU~!

Alright, I got it. Your a lesbian English teacher, right? You seem all tense, Prozac can help, give it a try. I hear you can get all the free meds you can ingest with the Big Bad Barry's new medical miracle plan.

[Amused Slew]

It's "you're" and if anyone is a lesbian, it's the couple treabaggers I offered to meet, THAT NEVER SHOWED ! Sure, talk big, we saw the loss and laughed at your chair..

Ps- Cute "compensation", the only thingy blunt is your mind...

[Amused Slew]

That's Oregon, but you're a teabagger, so.......

[Amused Slew]

Yep, you're a mouthy moron...

Let me help you.

Your

Your is the second person possessive adjective, used to describe something as belonging to you. Your is nearly always followed by a noun.

What is your name?

Is this your pen?

Your book is on the table.

This is your chair and this is mine.

What happened to your dog?

Your being here is causing some problems.

You're

You're is the contraction of "you are" and is often followed by the present participle (verb form ending in -ing).

You're going to be late.

Is that what you're wearing?

I think you're lying.

If you're ready, we can go.

I can't believe you're a doctor!

When you're my age, you'll understand.


The Bottom Line

The confusion between your and you're occurs because the two words are pronounced pretty much the same.

The ironclad rule - no exceptions - is that if you're able to replace the word with "you are," you're saying you're. Otherwise, your only choice is your.

[au contraire]

Amused Slew wrote:

Now there is loud clamor for transparency and investigations, accusations of a cover-up and incompetence, with those doing the talking all the while professing to only want the truth as concerned Americans and conscientious politicians. Give me a break. The only conscientious concern here is self-serving partisan BS.
Where was all that concern for our men and women serving in embassies and consulates across the globe when all the other attacks and killings occurred?
Like in 2002 when the US Consulate in the Karachi, Pakistan, was attacked and 10 were killed?
Or in 2004 when the US embassy in Uzbekistan was attacked and two were killed and another nine injured?
How about in 2004, when the US Consulate in Saudi Arabia was stormed and 8 lost their lives?
There is more: In 2006, armed men attacked the US Embassy in Syria and one was murdered.
Then in 2007 a grenade was thrown at the US Embassy in Athens.
In 2008, the US Embassy in Serbia was set on fire.
In 2008, bombings in the US Embassy in Yemen killed 10.
Notice the dates, all before the Obama administration.
Not yet convinced that all the noise over Benghazi has nothing to do with love of countryman? How about the biggest, most catastrophic attack and murder of Americans? As a New Yorker, Sept. 11, 2001, is indelibly imprinted on my psyche and I’m sure on the rest of the country. 3,000 perished in the most brutal act of terror in our recent history—all under a Republican administration. George W. Bush and his team had nine warnings that al-Qaida would attack within the United States, but they did absolutely nothing. No one in that administration’s head rolled for that stunning incompetence.
But Republicans now want President Obama’s head for Benghazi.
Here is an excerpt from the Ninth Public Hearing of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, held Thursday April 8, 2004, where Bush adviser Condoleezza Rice, is being questioned:
MS. RICE: I remember very well that the president was aware that there were issues inside the United States. He talked to people about this. But I don't remember the al Qaeda cells as being something that we were told we needed to do something about.
“MR. BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the Aug. 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB.
MS. RICE: I believe the title was "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States." Now, the PDB --
MR. BEN-VENISTE: Thank you.
Rice, in uncharacteristic obtuseness, for she is an academically brilliant and accomplished woman, gave the above unbelievable answer. We all now know they knew of imminent danger facing American citizens, but buried their head in the proverbial sand, ostrich style.

Where are all the War protestors that protested 24/7 with Bush. Where are the body counts on the evening news and fronts of the liberal press, especially since Obama's body count is higher than Bush's in Afgahnistan. Don't forget the sucicides either, due to Obama's failed leadership.