Comments
1 - 20 of 26 Comments Last updated Dec 8, 2012
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
space ace

Minneapolis, MN

#1 Dec 4, 2012
"The fiscal cliff negotiations are at such a standstill that not even aides to president barack obama and house speaker john boehner (R-ohio) talked tuesday. And the way the white house see's it. There won't be further face to face talk's beetween the two leaders until boehner say's he's willing to raise income tax rate's." politico.com
jerry

Saint Paul, MN

#2 Dec 4, 2012
Obama's council is not doing him any favors but they understand he won't make decisions without them, he's not capable. His power play will end up costing him, big time.
space ace

Minneapolis, MN

#3 Dec 4, 2012
jerry wrote:
Obama's council is not doing him any favors but they understand he won't make decisions without them, he's not capable. His power play will end up costing him, big time.
That's what i'm thinking. I think obama realises this to.
Middle Class Tax Payer

Minneapolis, MN

#4 Dec 4, 2012
space ace wrote:
"The fiscal cliff negotiations are at such a standstill that not even aides to president barack obama and house speaker john boehner (R-ohio) talked tuesday. And the way the white house see's it. There won't be further face to face talk's beetween the two leaders until boehner say's he's willing to raise income tax rate's." politico.com
John Boehner said he wants to cut entitlement spending.
Why then doesn't he start with TAX ENTITLEMENTS for the rich?!!
space ace

Minneapolis, MN

#5 Dec 4, 2012
Middle Class Tax Payer wrote:
<quoted text>
John Boehner said he wants to cut entitlement spending.
Why then doesn't he start with TAX ENTITLEMENTS for the rich?!!
Because cutting tax entitlements for the rich still wouldn't make up the budget deficit. Middle class tax payers would have to be involved. We don't even have the neccessary resources to support the entitlement state. You can't increase revenue by raising taxes. Increased revenue is what the entitlement state needs.
Middle Class Tax Payer

Saint Paul, MN

#6 Dec 6, 2012
space ace wrote:
<quoted text> Because cutting tax entitlements for the rich still wouldn't make up the budget deficit. Middle class tax payers would have to be involved. We don't even have the neccessary resources to support the entitlement state. You can't increase revenue by raising taxes. Increased revenue is what the entitlement state needs.
No one single attack will reverse our situation. Therefore, we must approach it from ALL angles, including removal of TAX ENTITLEMENTS for the rich. Thank you.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#7 Dec 6, 2012
Middle Class Tax Payer wrote:
<quoted text>
No one single attack will reverse our situation. Therefore, we must approach it from ALL angles, including removal of TAX ENTITLEMENTS for the rich. Thank you.
How much of the Money you receive from the Government are you Entitled to keep?

How much of the Money your neighbor earns, and the wealth she has amassed are you Entitled to?

How much Wealth that is not yours do you think should be taken from your Neighbor to make it "fair" for you Dependents?

I blame the Government Schools for the level of Ignorance you, and your Co-Dependents display.
Consistent

Minneapolis, MN

#8 Dec 6, 2012
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
How much of the Money you receive from the Government are you Entitled to keep?
How much of the Money your neighbor earns, and the wealth she has amassed are you Entitled to?
How much Wealth that is not yours do you think should be taken from your Neighbor to make it "fair" for you Dependents?
I blame the Government Schools for the level of Ignorance you, and your Co-Dependents display.
Thank you, President Obama for the cheap gas prices. I'm glad my guy didn't win.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#9 Dec 6, 2012
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you, President Obama for the cheap gas prices. I'm glad my guy didn't win.
Defective,

If you want to be taken as anything more that the Dependent Illiterate Ignoramus that you are, maybe creating an actual response to the Points others make, that cause you discomfort, will give you some credibility.

Nah, just be the waste of humanity that you have chosen to be.
Bridgework

Lincoln, NE

#11 Dec 6, 2012
Middle Class Tax Payer wrote:
<quoted text>
John Boehner said he wants to cut entitlement spending.
Why then doesn't he start with TAX ENTITLEMENTS for the rich?!!
The left just has something wrong with their heads. They consider allowing people and business to keep more of their income to be the same as the government giving people money or services paid for by others. They consider those paying most of the income taxes in this country to not be paying their fair shares. They like to pretend that the rich not paying enough is why we are $16 trillion in debt.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#12 Dec 6, 2012
They're paying less than when we had a responsible budget and folks are making less money while the rich are hoarding and off-shoring it...Oddly, you're trying desperately to ignore reality, poor transparent headed moron ~! LMAOROTFU~!
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#13 Dec 6, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
The left just has something wrong with their heads. They consider allowing people and business to keep more of their income to be the same as the government giving people money or services paid for by others. They consider those paying most of the income taxes in this country to not be paying their fair shares. They like to pretend that the rich not paying enough is why we are $16 trillion in debt.
We have a Bingo!

It is the fault of the Government Schools.

The Sheeple BELIEVE that "allowing" a person that uses their life to acquire wealth through work are somehow greedy if they do not joyfully give up the fruits of thier Labor to the Dependent Sheeple that should, in a "Just" Society, be allowed to perish if they cannot beg for enough food from their neighbor to be sustained.

Drive this sucker over the Cliff!

It is time to properly "order" society and allow the Dependents to eliminate themselves, or become productive and useful!
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#14 Dec 6, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
They're paying less than when we had a responsible budget and folks are making less money while the rich are hoarding and off-shoring it...Oddly, you're trying desperately to ignore reality, poor transparent headed moron ~! LMAOROTFU~!
The line for Thorazine Injections at the Asylum has been medicated......But the Therapeutic effect has not had enough time to take hold.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#16 Dec 6, 2012
During a speech in 1985, President Ronald Reagan said that a man who made a six figure income wanted to testify before congress to explain why he thought "paying a smaller tax" than his secretary was wrong. in 2011, President Barack Obama made the same argument about Warren Buffett's secretary.

"Just a few moments ago, I told some people inside the building here of a letter that I just received the day before yesterday. It's a letter from a man out here in the country, an executive who's earning in six figures -- well above $100,000 a year. He wrote me in support of the tax plan because he said,``I am legally able to take advantage of the present tax code -- nothing dishonest, doing what the law prescribes -- and wind up paying a smaller salary than my secretary gets -- or I mean, paying a smaller -- I'm sorry, paying a smaller tax than my secretary pays.'' And he wrote me the letter to tell me he'd like to come to Washington and testify before Congress as to how that's possible for him to do and why it is wrong."

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The same year, 1985, President Reagan delivered another speech further expounding on the effects of loopholes that allowed the wealthy to pay little to no taxes.

President Reagan:
"We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that's crazy. It's time we stopped it."
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#17 Dec 6, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
During a speech in 1985, President Ronald Reagan said that a man who made a six figure income wanted to testify before congress to explain why he thought "paying a smaller tax" than his secretary was wrong. in 2011, President Barack Obama made the same argument about Warren Buffett's secretary.
"Just a few moments ago, I told some people inside the building here of a letter that I just received the day before yesterday. It's a letter from a man out here in the country, an executive who's earning in six figures -- well above $100,000 a year. He wrote me in support of the tax plan because he said,``I am legally able to take advantage of the present tax code -- nothing dishonest, doing what the law prescribes -- and wind up paying a smaller salary than my secretary gets -- or I mean, paying a smaller -- I'm sorry, paying a smaller tax than my secretary pays.'' And he wrote me the letter to tell me he'd like to come to Washington and testify before Congress as to how that's possible for him to do and why it is wrong."
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
The same year, 1985, President Reagan delivered another speech further expounding on the effects of loopholes that allowed the wealthy to pay little to no taxes.
President Reagan:
"We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that's crazy. It's time we stopped it."
Idiot,

Why is so difficult for you to embrace your idiocy?

Even your cut/pastes are never relevant to any issue that you post them on.

As a Psychotic EVERYTHING you post is a "Defensive Reaction",(Google the expression!) and you use every one of the 12 or so Defenses defined by Professionals to identify Mentally Ill like you that know nothing but "Defensive Reactions".

Nothing you post has EVER had any value, and we are subjected to you working out your Uncle Daddy issues in public on this Forum, to the detriment of we the normal functioning Human Beings.

Isn't there a more appropriate Forum on the Internet for Sociopaths like you to do the "Uh Huh, Yup, Yup, Yup, Uh Huh" babble with others just like you? We know that you in the 10% Defective exist, and always will.

There must be a Home for Psychotics like you on the Internet someplace.

Would you like me to find a "Home" for you on the Internet where you can babble with your Co Defectives?
Bridgework

Lincoln, NE

#18 Dec 6, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
During a speech in 1985, President Ronald Reagan said that a man who made a six figure income wanted to testify before congress to explain why he thought "paying a smaller tax" than his secretary was wrong. in 2011, President Barack Obama made the same argument about Warren Buffett's secretary.
"Just a few moments ago, I told some people inside the building here of a letter that I just received the day before yesterday. It's a letter from a man out here in the country, an executive who's earning in six figures -- well above $100,000 a year. He wrote me in support of the tax plan because he said,``I am legally able to take advantage of the present tax code -- nothing dishonest, doing what the law prescribes -- and wind up paying a smaller salary than my secretary gets -- or I mean, paying a smaller -- I'm sorry, paying a smaller tax than my secretary pays.'' And he wrote me the letter to tell me he'd like to come to Washington and testify before Congress as to how that's possible for him to do and why it is wrong."
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
The same year, 1985, President Reagan delivered another speech further expounding on the effects of loopholes that allowed the wealthy to pay little to no taxes.
President Reagan:
"We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that's crazy. It's time we stopped it."
Are you posting this because you agree with Romney and the republicans that we should be closing loopholes and not raising taxes?

P.S. How many millionaires pay nothing vs. those who pay 20%?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#19 Dec 7, 2012
Both dumb questions... Typical putz. The reality is the rich need to pay more or our system will fail.
Having TOO MUCH MONEY/POWER IN FEW HANDS KILLS DEMOCRACY.
Seattle PD

Grantsburg, WI

#20 Dec 7, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
Both dumb questions... Typical putz. The reality is the rich need to pay more or our system will fail.
Having TOO MUCH MONEY/POWER IN FEW HANDS KILLS DEMOCRACY.
It seems to really disturb you that you have no excuse for your Bitter Victim, Sociopathic Defective Personality.

WE know that the despicable abusive nature you reveal all day every day, is a "Sexual Thing" for you, and that it is based on the fact that you are a Genetic Defective from an Unholy Coupling of a Brother and Sister.

When the Economic Collapse comes, you need to be placed into the gutter and allowed to perish. One of the Greatest Outcomes of the destruction that the Collectivists are bringing, is that Humanity will weed out trash like you, and repair the damage to humanity that sustaining you and yours has wrought.

WE are grateful that as a Hermaphrodite, you cannot contaminate the Gene Pool with your Defects.

Thank goodness for this minor blessing.
Bridgework

Lincoln, NE

#22 Dec 7, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
Both dumb questions... Typical putz. The reality is the rich need to pay more or our system will fail.
Having TOO MUCH MONEY/POWER IN FEW HANDS KILLS DEMOCRACY.
If all the fiscal cliff raises and cuts happen we will still be a trillion in the red next year. As the Obama tax cuts will most likely be extended it is projected to be closer to 1.4 tillion. Just how much do you want to raise taxes on the rich to close that gap?
Cloud 9

United States

#23 Dec 7, 2012
Why pay President and Congress if they arn't doing their jpbs?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 6 hr SpaceBlues 32,489
Men who don't like football 6 hr Edwin 3
The 1% Should Pay Their Fair Share in Taxes 10 hr Go Blue Forever 30
Obamacare More Unpopular Than Ever 10 hr Sadie 9
Obama: "no strategy" on Isis. 11 hr Wendall 12
Minneapolis: A Hotbed For Radical Islam 11 hr JamesA 77
Woman's head stepped on by Rand Paul supporters (Oct '10) 13 hr LMS 26,227
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••