Republicans now responsible for the economy

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments
1 - 8 of 8 Comments Last updated Mar 4, 2013
liBeRALs

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

With the sequester the Republicans bought control of the US economy. The resulting recession is on the GOP.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

liBeRALs wrote:
With the sequester the Republicans bought control of the US economy. The resulting recession is on the GOP.
Nice attempt to spin. The party in charge of the Oval Office gets the credit, and the blame.
redeemer

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

liBeRALs wrote:
With the sequester the Republicans bought control of the US economy. The resulting recession is on the GOP.
You're right and the GOP can't run from that fact.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Mar 4, 2013
 
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text>You're right and the GOP can't run from that fact.
Bahayahahayahh,

Barry Soetoro's Handlers MADE Barry demand the Sequester!

Thank God for the Republicans that Grew the balls to say NO to the Victim Demokrats, and call the Chicago Mob's Bluff on Sequestration!

Fauching Sheeple!
liBeRALs

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Mar 4, 2013
 
The Republicans are already sliding father down in the polls, which is scarcely possible as low as they are now.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove

Fifty-one percent (51%) of all voters give the president good or excellent marks for handling national security issues. Forty-four percent (44%) say the same about his handling of the U.S. economy.

Most voters believe it is at least somewhat important to reduce income inequality and support free market policies. Forty-seven percent (47%) say policies to allow and encourage free market competition are Very Important. Thirty-six percent (36%) say the same about reducing the income gap between rich and poor. Given a choice, 49% believe free markets are more important. Thirty-nine percent (39%) place a higher priority on reducing income inequality.

(From the 5 point biased Rasmussen Polls)
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Mar 4, 2013
 
liBeRALs wrote:
The Republicans are already sliding father down in the polls, which is scarcely possible as low as they are now.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Monday shows that 51% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Obama's job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove
Fifty-one percent (51%) of all voters give the president good or excellent marks for handling national security issues. Forty-four percent (44%) say the same about his handling of the U.S. economy.
Most voters believe it is at least somewhat important to reduce income inequality and support free market policies. Forty-seven percent (47%) say policies to allow and encourage free market competition are Very Important. Thirty-six percent (36%) say the same about reducing the income gap between rich and poor. Given a choice, 49% believe free markets are more important. Thirty-nine percent (39%) place a higher priority on reducing income inequality.
(From the 5 point biased Rasmussen Polls)
You left this part of the Rasmussen poll out, Today’s figures include 30% who Strongly Approve of the way Obama is performing as president and 39% who Strongly Disapprove. This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of -9 (see trends).
liBeRALs

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Mar 4, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

That's a madeup stat. the 51% stat is the real story here - when you add the 5 point Rasmussen bias in, that is a 56% approval rating!
Wade Gustafson

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Mar 4, 2013
 
The sequestration was Obama's plan. He lied about it during the debate in October, and he's lying about it now.

When Obama ran in 2008 he called Bush immoral and unpatriotic for running up the national debt by $5 trillion in almost 8 years. Obama has run it up by $6.5 trillion in half that time.

The sequestration calls for cuts of about 2%. Those cuts can be made without setting prisoners free and without reducing security, IF the administration wishes to do so. They appafently care more about politics than the well-being of the country. The US would be better off with minor budget cuts than with more borrowing from China. Think how wonderful our lives will be when the US defaults on those loans from China.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 25 min Mothra 32,426
Hero USC footballer Josh Shaw injured saving dr... 6 hr Mark Winshel 2
Proposed high-voltage power lines raise fears i... (Apr '09) 11 hr lieht 94
Drop one word....add one word game 11 hr Capt Crunch 81
Woman's head stepped on by Rand Paul supporters (Oct '10) 13 hr Huh 26,225
Robin Williams Emmys tribute criticised for inc... 17 hr cantmakeitup 11
Debate: Ferguson - Minneapolis, MN 18 hr NSNovum 75
•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••