One-Minute Poetry Slam Eviscerates Michele Bachmann's Bigotry

Apr 16, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Advocate

A finalist in the 2013 Women of the World Poetry Slam has a few powerful words for Minnesota Rep.

Comments (Page 18)

Showing posts 341 - 360 of497
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Don Joe

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#389
Apr 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>sure they can. i gave you examples.
trade groups of ordinary old businessmen and women can form lobbying groups.
concerned citizens can form lobbying groups.
knowing about your own country is fun!
trade groups? Oh, yes, you mean groups of corporations can write laws for their own profit.

concerned citizens? I suppose if you get enough concerned citizens, they could, like OWS did, yet since they didn't have big money behind them, they could not accomplish anything.

Knowing about your own country is depressing. I would much rather have freedom.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#391
Apr 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Don Joe wrote:
<quoted text>
trade groups? Oh, yes, you mean groups of corporations can write laws for their own profit.
concerned citizens? I suppose if you get enough concerned citizens, they could, like OWS did, yet since they didn't have big money behind them, they could not accomplish anything.
Knowing about your own country is depressing. I would much rather have freedom.
No OWS did nothing as they had nothing to back them up, idea wise. complaining that you are a failure won't get you much...look what it gets you here!

If your representatives let them write the laws they will. get involved and elect better reps.

who has more influence, the person who, for free, gets in at the grass roots level and picks which pols will be on the ballot, or the parson who writes a $10,000 check to the candidate the other person put on the ballot?

your whining about successful people is just that, whining.

your claim about lobbying shows you have no idea of how your own nation works. most would suggest the two are related.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#392
Apr 24, 2013
 
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, you have every right to disgree and protest. But please remember, the church does not dictate the law of the land (thank God!). I for one hope the court acts quickly in favor of gay marriage, so we can get past this petty nonsense, and get on with the continuing process of promoting human freedom.
Would not want the Church to dictate the law of the land, just like I don't want the law of land to dictate to the Church what it can or cannot do. And my friend, that is exactly where the gay marriage law is leading. Once passed, the next thing that will happen, someone or group will file a lawsuit against the Church for the right to be married in the Church. Not to so, would be considered discrimation based on gender/race. The odds are better than 2-1 in favor of this happening. Not fear mongering, just being realistic.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#393
Apr 24, 2013
 
Consistent wrote:
Definition of EVISCERATE
transitive verb
1)
: to take out the entrails of : disembowel
: to deprive of vital content or force
2)
: to remove an organ from (a patient) or the contents of (an organ)
intransitive verb
: to protrude through a surgical incision or suffer protrusion of a part through an incision
Amerika needs to Lovingly "Embrace" you freaks and the evisceration that you wish on other Human Beings, as the Loving Normal Humans that you Deviated Homosexuals are.
Slam People that have a Faith in the God of the Universe.
YOU have a valuable contribution to make to Gods plan and to Humanity.
Wow.... talk about emotional over-involvement.... THERAPY. check into it.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#395
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>Would not want the Church to dictate the law of the land, just like I don't want the law of land to dictate to the Church what it can or cannot do. And my friend, that is exactly where the gay marriage law is leading. Once passed, the next thing that will happen, someone or group will file a lawsuit against the Church for the right to be married in the Church. Not to so, would be considered discrimation based on gender/race. The odds are better than 2-1 in favor of this happening. Not fear mongering, just being realistic.
your false scenario was proven to not come true before you were told to parrot it. try thinking for yourself.

we have a constitution that would prevent such lawsuits. your cult can practice whatever bigotry they wish in the confines of their tax subsidized churches.

yes, you are fear mongering and using a proven false scenario to do so.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#396
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>Would not want the Church to dictate the law of the land, just like I don't want the law of land to dictate to the Church what it can or cannot do. And my friend, that is exactly where the gay marriage law is leading. Once passed, the next thing that will happen, someone or group will file a lawsuit against the Church for the right to be married in the Church. Not to so, would be considered discrimation based on gender/race. The odds are better than 2-1 in favor of this happening. Not fear mongering, just being realistic.
Complete and total BULLSHIT. Churches are not required to marry ANYBODY, so yes, you are fear mongering.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#397
Apr 24, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>your false scenario was proven to not come true before you were told to parrot it. try thinking for yourself.
we have a constitution that would prevent such lawsuits. your cult can practice whatever bigotry they wish in the confines of their tax subsidized churches.
yes, you are fear mongering and using a proven false scenario to do so.
What in the constitution prevents such lawsuits? Letís take Gay/Lesbian out of the scenario and insert Blacks. Now, do we have a lawsuit? You would have so many lawyers licking their chops to get into the millions of dollars the Church has, just in property alone! It would make your head spin. It is not a false scenario, nor is it proven, anywhere, to be false, by any authority. It has been a concern, in the Congress of US Bishops for years, 13 to be exact!

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#399
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>Would not want the Church to dictate the law of the land, just like I don't want the law of land to dictate to the Church what it can or cannot do. And my friend, that is exactly where the gay marriage law is leading. Once passed, the next thing that will happen, someone or group will file a lawsuit against the Church for the right to be married in the Church. Not to so, would be considered discrimation based on gender/race. The odds are better than 2-1 in favor of this happening. Not fear mongering, just being realistic.
I'm sorry, but America is not a theocracy. The law of the land trumps church policy if there is a conflict. The law has every right to dictate to the church what it can or cannot do if they disobey a law. To take an extreme example, suppose a particular church tells its parishioners that they must kill their firstborn, and they do so. It is an act of murder, subject to criminal prosecution, no matter what that church believes.

Personally, I believe marriage is a legal contract, but not necessarily a religious one. I suppose the church has the right to refuse to marry gay couples. But one would wish the church would come out of the dark ages and grow up.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#400
Apr 24, 2013
 
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Complete and total BULLSHIT. Churches are not required to marry ANYBODY, so yes, you are fear mongering.
Today, your right, care to predict the future?

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#402
Apr 24, 2013
 
Lawrence Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>I'm sorry, but America is not a theocracy. The law of the land trumps church policy if there is a conflict. The law has every right to dictate to the church what it can or cannot do if they disobey a law. To take an extreme example, suppose a particular church tells its parishioners that they must kill their firstborn, and they do so. It is an act of murder, subject to criminal prosecution, no matter what that church believes.
Personally, I believe marriage is a legal contract, but not necessarily a religious one. I suppose the church has the right to refuse to marry gay couples. But one would wish the church would come out of the dark ages and grow up.
Murder is currently forbidden by law, therefore a non issue. The issue is, if Gay Marriage is now allowed, under law, what prevents the ACLU or any other set of lawyers to challenge the Church's stand against marrying Gays/Lesbians. One could easily see a discrimination suit being filed. Religious Freedoms have been impinged upon already by this Administration via the Affordable Health Care Act. I am not sure you can honestly say this isnít a possibility.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#403
Apr 24, 2013
 
NSP Phocker wrote:
<quoted text>
I predict that illiterate teabaggers like you that can't even spell will die off of old age.
At some point, I will, as will you. Are you prepared? OH, Iíll match my education versus yours anytime. I went to school when passing wasn't a social mandate!

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#404
Apr 24, 2013
 
NSP Phocker wrote:
Maybe it is time for churches to quit being bigoted then.
They call it beliefs, and have been for over 2000 years!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#406
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>They call it beliefs, and have been for over 2000 years!
they are still bigoted beliefs...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#407
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>What in the constitution prevents such lawsuits? Letís take Gay/Lesbian out of the scenario and insert Blacks. Now, do we have a lawsuit? You would have so many lawyers licking their chops to get into the millions of dollars the Church has, just in property alone! It would make your head spin. It is not a false scenario, nor is it proven, anywhere, to be false, by any authority. It has been a concern, in the Congress of US Bishops for years, 13 to be exact!
it would be called the first amendment. and yes, if your church wanted to discriminate against blacks, that would be your cult's right to do so...in the confines of your church.

when church's venture out into the real world, they have to play by the real world rules.

the catholic church right now discriminates against women, against the laws in the US, don't they? yes they do.

your scenario was proven false before you were told to parrot it...

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#408
Apr 24, 2013
 
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it would be called the first amendment. and yes, if your church wanted to discriminate against blacks, that would be your cult's right to do so...in the confines of your church.
when church's venture out into the real world, they have to play by the real world rules.
the catholic church right now discriminates against women, against the laws in the US, don't they? yes they do.
your scenario was proven false before you were told to parrot it...
I thought so, it is the Church you have an issue with. Ok, how does the Catholic Church discrimate against woman? Or better yet the current laws of the US?
This should be very interesting!
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#409
Apr 24, 2013
 
More welfare questions, by the biggest loser.....

We don't exist, to make you as intelligent as normals...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#410
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>I thought so, it is the Church you have an issue with. Ok, how does the Catholic Church discrimate against woman? Or better yet the current laws of the US?
This should be very interesting!
no i have a problem with cults trying to impose their stone-age myths on the real world. be a bigot in your church...i don't care.

if a business prevented women from being a priest or a CEO, they would be sued, but your cult can do it in your tax subsidized churches all you want.

your false scenario was proven to not come true before you were told to parrot it...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#411
Apr 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>What in the constitution prevents such lawsuits? Letís take Gay/Lesbian out of the scenario and insert Blacks. Now, do we have a lawsuit? You would have so many lawyers licking their chops to get into the millions of dollars the Church has, just in property alone! It would make your head spin. It is not a false scenario, nor is it proven, anywhere, to be false, by any authority. It has been a concern, in the Congress of US Bishops for years, 13 to be exact!
yes, how 'bout that tax subsidized church property...

how long do you think the basilica in Mpls and the cathedral in St. Paul would belong to the church if they had to pay the going rate on that prime real estate?

why do you need your faith subsidized? is it that weak?

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#412
Apr 24, 2013
 
Niether of the Above wrote:
<quoted text>Murder is currently forbidden by law, therefore a non issue. The issue is, if Gay Marriage is now allowed, under law, what prevents the ACLU or any other set of lawyers to challenge the Church's stand against marrying Gays/Lesbians. One could easily see a discrimination suit being filed. Religious Freedoms have been impinged upon already by this Administration via the Affordable Health Care Act. I am not sure you can honestly say this isnít a possibility.
What you suggest is a possibility. If the Church were to win the case, so be it. I would personally hope they'd lose.

You first sentence in this post makes my previous point. The law trumps any church tenet or alleged freedom that does not comply with the law.

I disagree with your assertion that religious freedoms have been impinged upon by the administration, or by Obamacare. What you are pointing out is a perfect example of the law being the final word. The Affordable Care Act is law, and if the Church chooses to disobey that law, that is not a "freedom" the Church has any right to claim.

I think it's a simple fact that, in the U.S., the Church has to operate within the confines of the law. It has no freedoms beyond that, whether they come from "on high", or from some scribe with too much time on his hands.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#413
Apr 24, 2013
 
Bushwhacker wrote:
We don't exist,...
I have prayed every night for the past several years for that statement to be true

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 341 - 360 of497
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••