Google asks secret court to lift gag order on govt surveillance
Posted in the Minneapolis Forum
#1 Jun 18, 2013
WASHINGTON Google on Tuesday sharply challenged the federal governments gag order on its Internet surveillance program, citing what it described as a First Amendment right to divulge how many requests it receives from the government for data about its customers in the name of national security.
The move came in a legal motion filed in the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and was aimed at mending Googles reputation after it was identified this month as one of nine U.S. Internet companies that gave the National Security Agency access to data on its customers. Revelations about the program, known as PRISM, by a former NSA contractor has cracked open a broader debate about the privacy of Americans communications from government monitoring.
The publication of such data requests would answer questions about the number of Google users or accounts affected by U.S. intelligence activities. But it wouldnt answer more critical questions on how much data is being disclosed, including whether information belonging to Americans has been swept up into investigations on a foreign targets.
Googles reputation and business has been harmed by the false or misleading reports in the media, and Googles users are concerned by the allegations, according to the companys motion.Google must respond to such claims with more than generalities.
Google has previously disclosed the number of data requests it receives from civilian law enforcement.
A company statement Tuesday said that lumping national security requests together with criminal requests as some companies have been permitted to do would be a backward step for our users.
Alex Abdo, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, said all the technology companies should be allowed to release as many details as possible, and that the government should divulge its legal justification of the surveillance program.
The public has a right to know more about the governments sweeping surveillance programs so that it can judge for itself whether they are necessary and legal, Abdo said in a statement.
#2 Jun 18, 2013
HEY PAL, we ALL saw who started YOUR thread on ball LICKING !!!!!
Just saying, your closet is NOW M-T er, now that YOU'RE O-U-T !!!
Space cr-ace and the licking threads...
Anyone else see a pattern ???
Add your comments below
|Hillary will lose! "EmailGate" NOT WORTHY TO BE...||1 hr||LIbEralS||8|
|Sick hillary||1 hr||LIbEralS||30|
|Wikileaks highlights||23 hr||LIbEralS||36|
|Hillary Clinton wants to tear families apart! S...||Mon||The Mayor||4|
|Rev. Dr. Franklyn V. Beckles, Jr. (Aug '13)||Mon||Teri Klum||19|
|Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10)||Sun||Glitter2639||35,589|
Find what you want!
Search Minneapolis Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC