Taxpayer dollars used to fund study t...

Taxpayer dollars used to fund study tying Tea Party to tobacco lobby

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#1 Feb 15, 2013
Government waste at its very worst. Why is taxpayer money being used to fund a study of the tea party and its alleged link to tobacco companies? With $7,000,000 of taxpayer money one would think the NIH and NCI would use the money to study ways to prevent youth smoking, help people quit smoking or study ways to prevent or even cure cancer. Not pissing it away on some blatantly partisan attack on some group who is not in favor with the current administration. There should be some heads rolling over this.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/15/ta...
Consistent

Saint Paul, MN

#2 Feb 15, 2013
Can you find a non-biased source that discusses this?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#3 Feb 15, 2013
Teabaggers and selective editing ???

PRECIOUS !!!

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

OOPS ~!

"but federal records show researchers at the university have received $7 million since 2007 to study tobacco issues."

Tobacco issues including lung cancer, huh ???

scooby slew

Saint Paul, MN

#4 Feb 15, 2013
Consistent wrote:
Can you find a non-biased source that discusses this?
The think progress poster asks for a non-biased source?

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#5 Feb 15, 2013
Consistent wrote:
Can you find a non-biased source that discusses this?
There is no such thing as a "non-biased" source.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#6 Feb 15, 2013
The moron who doesn't contribute, continues ignorantly ??

Teabaggers and selective editing ???

PRECIOUS !!!

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

OOPS ~!

"but federal records show researchers at the university have received $7 million since 2007 to study tobacco issues."

Tobacco issues including lung cancer, huh ???

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#7 Feb 15, 2013
Government waste at it's worst.

" It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study, but federal records show researchers at the university have received $7 million since 2007 to study tobacco issues."

The first half of this sentence indicates that our tax money is not being managed very well if they don't know where every penny went. Or that they are lying or incompetent. The second half of this sentence is just as telling. What does a political groups connections to corporations like big tobacco have to do with "tobacco issues"? Or health or even cancer?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#8 Feb 15, 2013
"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."

"It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study,.."
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#9 Feb 15, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
Government waste at it's worst.
" It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study, but federal records show researchers at the university have received $7 million since 2007 to study tobacco issues."
The first half of this sentence indicates that our tax money is not being managed very well if they don't know where every penny went. Or that they are lying or incompetent. The second half of this sentence is just as telling. What does a political groups connections to corporations like big tobacco have to do with "tobacco issues"? Or health or even cancer?
Now the research institute is responsible for the Faux Snooze's lack of financial detail ??? LMAOROTFU~! "Man", you're too nut-so to walk upright ....
Bridgework

Saint Paul, MN

#10 Feb 15, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
Government waste at it's worst.
" It's difficult to tell how much grant money specifically went toward this study, but federal records show researchers at the university have received $7 million since 2007 to study tobacco issues."
The first half of this sentence indicates that our tax money is not being managed very well if they don't know where every penny went. Or that they are lying or incompetent. The second half of this sentence is just as telling. What does a political groups connections to corporations like big tobacco have to do with "tobacco issues"? Or health or even cancer?
Can't you make up better lies to post?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
bernie sanders is insane 6 min space ace 11
girls 10 min space ace 11
News Discontent sues Moorhead over drug ordinance (Jan '12) 1 hr Hillaryious 19
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 2 hr Earthling-1 35,431
the downfall 7 hr Inquiring Minds 4
new hampshire results Thu Tellitlikeitis 20
News Chelsea Clinton rallies the faithful in Twin Ci... Wed TOASTER 31
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages