Why should the rich pay at higher tax rates than they do now

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of62
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
ist

Duluth, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Mar 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

http://money.cnn.com/2013/03/19/news/economy/...

Cyprus liberals also had the notion that all wealth belonged to the state and could be withheld in larger percentages whenever the state needed it. People that were determined to have had 'excess' were targeted for wealth confiscation.

Don't think Obama isn't watching this closely.
ist

Duluth, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Mar 19, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

The Truth wrote:
Why should the rich pay at higher tax rates than they do now>
Because they are the only economic group that has seen measurably increased income in recent years.
I don't think that any other groups have seen any gains in their earnings and wages. I think the other groups have all seen losses.
The losses really hurt when you are in a lower income group. If you had an income of $50,000 per year, and it decreases to $35,000, that can determine whether or not you can pay your rent or afford health insurance.$50,000 is slightly above average, but $35,000 is below it. Assuming it is a loss in income that hits pretty much across that pay range, it is a loss of $15,000 that can't be taxed by the government. At that pay level, your money is taken out of your paycheck. You have normally no choice but to pay your taxes. So the government loses income. And actually,$50,000 is probably a pretty high starting figure for the incomes of people who have been losing the financial tug-of-war.
As we saw with Romney, people who make millions, lots more than the $50,000-30,000 level have all kinds of ways to hide their income and protect it from taxes. At most the earner of the lower wage or salary can maybe buy a house and deduct the interest or the taxes on that. The person earning millions hires an accountant and shields his money from taxes -- finds tax shelters.
That is the way that it works and that is why those who have gained need to pay at very high tax rates while those who earn relatively little should not.
The person earning $35,000 now who earned more later may have already lost a home and may be doing two jobs now rather than the one he or she did before. I have seen that in my family.
The odd thing is that the person who earns less, say a couple with three children, has in some respects more crises in life than those who earn more. The low earners' cars break down. The electricity gets turned off. Buying the kids' school clothes is a crisis that takes mom to the second-hand store. The other kids in school have the internet and computers. Your kids don't. It's a never-ending battle focused on money.
For the families that do better, the big challenge is not buying everything their children want, not accumulating too much.
Disparity in incomes is a far bigger social malady than high taxes on the rich.
It's the disparity that is dividing our country. We were far better off when I was a child and we were ALL a lot poorer.
So yes I would like to see higher taxes on the rich. They should pay a bigger share toward educating and providing health care for all of our children.
I was born during WWII. When I was growing up, I was taught that we are one country, that we are in it together. I remember how we were all so afraid of the atomic bomb. I remember how proud we were of our response to Sputnik. I still believe that we are one country and in it together. Apparently the rich, those who have gained the most from the technological and scientific progress that our tax dollars have made possible, don't.
There would be no internet, no four-lane highways, no cell phones, no news from Mars, fewer new pharmaceutical miracles, less information about healthy diets and what is happening to our environment, especially the oceans and the how we learn and you name it less information and less knowledge if we didn't tax the rich at rates as high as possible.
The top wealthiest 5% pay 70% of our tax liability. The next 45% of wage earners pay the rest. The bottom 50% either pay nothing or receive benefits that actually increases our overall tax liability.

If my rich roommate paid 70% of our rent, I don't think I could accuse him of not paying his fair share. Furthermore, to publicly question his patriotism for not paying more would make me a slanderous, disgusting human being like you.

This entire argument of yours is probably one of the most ignorant, inflammatory lies in American history.
Iowan

West Des Moines, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Mar 19, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Because they can afford it, while the working man cannot. The working man works hard but is attacked into poverty by capitalism.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Mar 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Toidi Slayer wrote:
<quoted text>
After following your most recent posts, I've come to the conclusion that you are in the wrong country.
I've decided you're against a man bettering himself, which is exactly how I want my tax dollars spent... Of course, in your case, you're "right".
PHD2

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Mar 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

I'd love to see a Minnesota law mandating people like Mark Dayton who shelters his wealth in South Dakota pay more taxes to Minnesota.

I'll make a bet Dayton doesn't increase HIS phocking taxes...
Christingle Matthews

Grantsburg, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

"Do Not feed the mammals, they will become lazy and stop feeding themselves"
Christingle Matthews

Grantsburg, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

In the woods a hunter may feed the deer, bear, pigs, etc every day, caring for the biological needs of the mammals.

The hunter plants Food Crops that the mammals enjoy.

The hunter places Free Food like corn, pumpkins, beans, honey, and oats in piles. The hunter makes sure that water is readily available, and that shelter is provided for the mammals comfort.

If the mammals desire "more", the hunter will provide more (for a while). The hunter needs as many mammals as possible so that the hunters desires are met. Sometimes the mammals do not even know that they needed more, or that they were victims because other mammals have creature comforts that the Free Food mammals do not have.

The hunter is on top of this and he steals only the best from his neighbors to feed his mammals.

The Mammals gather together in the location of the Free Food, as close to the Free Stuff as possible. The mammals KNOW where the Free Stuff is and they fight to be the 1st at the Feed Piles. If they cannot get what they demand, the mammals will kill each other off to stay 1st at the Feed Trough.

Eventually the hunter has the Mammals trained. Now the Hunter has a readily available, readily willing, herd of mammals to use as the hunter chooses.

The hunter will kill some of the mammals, but not all.

The hunter OWNS these mammals and they will supply his needs. The mammals sacrifice their nature, and sell their souls for the Free Food that the hunter offers.

The hunter OWNS the mammals. He can reduce the Free Food Choices. He can Move the Feed Pile. He can change the living conditions. He can reduce the amount of free food, water, and stop planting crops.

The mammals will accept multiple abuses by the hunter, and defend the hunters good name against any that threaten the hunter. The mammals have become empty vessels of what God intended them to be.
LIbEralS

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Mar 20, 2013
 
redeemer wrote:
<quoted text>You're such a phony!
In what way?
LIbEralS

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bushwhacker wrote:
<quoted text>I've decided you're against a man bettering himself, which is exactly how I want my tax dollars spent... Of course, in your case, you're "right".
If you truely are for "a man bettering himself", then you are in the wrong party. The ONLY thing progressives do is prevent people from being able to work for a better life. Instead, they want to take from those that are attempting to better themselves. Handouts were meant to be a temporary thing to help you until you got back on your feet.
Christingle Matthews

Grantsburg, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

"a man bettering himself"

I have an In-Law that exclaims her Victimhood in classic Victim Newspeak.

"I am trying to be Independent, but nobody will help me"

Only a true defect like Slewsie considers the redistribution of one mans wealth to a Dependent, is helping "a man bettering himself".

But, our Resident Sociopath has never had an original thought, so you know she got this expression from other Victim Professionals with websites that the Sheeple visit.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Toidi Slayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Just how is a handout bettering himself? And I fail to see how stealing money out of hard working citizens pockets qualifies either.
You fail to see it, because you're busy with rhetoric & buzz words. When you are intelligent enough to understand, it's plain.
Bushwhacker

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Bushwhacker wrote:
<quoted text>The truth is the rich have gotten richer AT THE EXPENSE OF THE MIDDLE CLASS......
i agree, barry soetoro only has ( 5 ) chef's on air force one.

what a joke this muslim, socialist liberal is.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Not dishonest at all, right faker ???
LIbEralS

Saint Paul, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Bushwhacker wrote:
<quoted text>You fail to see it, because you're busy with rhetoric & buzz words. When you are intelligent enough to understand, it's plain.
Actually, you have it backwards. When I get Slewpid enough I will understand. Well, I still may not understand, but I will do as Barry wishes anyway.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

piles of "benifits" ???

Get A CLUE....

Because, in this country we tax folks who have the money and benefits from public services.....Convince me, the poor use the roads as harshly as any semi-truck... Let alone, the legal system.
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

LIbEralS wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, you have it backwards. When I get Slewpid enough I will understand. Well, I still may not understand, but I will do as Barry wishes anyway.
Straight to buzz words, rhetoric, and 4th grade .... Funny, you voting intelligently, when you cannot hold up a simple discussion.
Bushwhacker

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bushwhacker wrote:
piles of "benifits" ???
Get A CLUE....
Because, in this country we tax folks who have the money and benefits from public services.....Convince me, the poor use the roads as harshly as any semi-truck... Let alone, the legal system.
in tis country we tax people that go to high school and graduate, then go to college and graduate, get a job and work 50-70- hrs a week to get ahead, start their own business and TAKE all the risk, hire people to grow THEIR business and then give it all away to people that make poor choices -( IT IS THEIR FAULT ) not mine.

STOP SPENDING MY MONEY !!
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Mar 20, 2013
 
Bushwhacker wrote:
benefits from public services
I stay away from all godless government services... since I don't use them can I opt out?
Bushwhacker

Kent, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Mar 20, 2013
 
Sure, quit driving on public roads.... You mention Mother Russia, then pretend to have a valid point ? Naw, you're a nut-so.
pearl

Salt Lake City, UT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Mar 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Anti Obiden wrote:
<quoted text>
the liberal noise, they claim to be for the poor and the church. Why do they not follow the Bible?
gay marriage = is a SIN
abortion = is a SIN
Ture Christians follow the conservative, it is that simple. Liberals are NOT Christians.
they can not be.
That's because they know Christianity is an corrupt path.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 40 of62
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••