As gun control activists gather, senator takes weapons ban off table

Feb 18, 2013 Read more: Star Tribune 16

With an insider's eye, Hot Dish tracks the tastiest bits of Minnesota's political scene and keep you up-to-date on those elected to serve you.

Read more
Mean Gene

Minneapolis, MN

#1 Feb 19, 2013
A Democrat politician who actually listens to his constituents, how rare!
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#2 Feb 19, 2013
Mean Gene wrote:
A Democrat politician who actually listens to his constituents, how rare!
White folks expect an outright ban to be accepted ?? LMAOROTFU~! Nice weak post/point, for a putz. "man", why'd you bother with blather...
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#3 Feb 19, 2013
What folks expect an outright ban to be accepted ?? LMAOROTFU~! Nice weak post/point, for a putz. "man", why'd you bother with blather...

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#4 Feb 19, 2013
Any politician that listens to their constituents is rare.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#5 Feb 19, 2013
It was a nonsense speech ! LMAOROFU~!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#6 Feb 19, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
Any politician that listens to their constituents is rare.
Especially since they control both legislative branches and the governor's office.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#7 Feb 19, 2013
Like a little state... would REALLY take on the second amendment, right morons ??? LMAOROTU~
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#8 Feb 19, 2013
Bushwhacked wrote:
Like a little state... would REALLY take on the second amendment, right morons ??? LMAOROTU~
Colorado is taking on the 2nd amendment, Conneticut is, Chicago and the District of Columbia did(and lost). Oh, I forgot, your posts are not rooted in any facts, just reflections of your inadequacy in reading comprehension.

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#9 Feb 19, 2013
non-starter wrote:
<quoted text>Colorado is taking on the 2nd amendment, Conneticut is, Chicago and the District of Columbia did(and lost). Oh, I forgot, your posts are not rooted in any facts, just reflections of your inadequacy in reading comprehension.
As expected from the low information, low integrity plagiarist.

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#10 Mar 2, 2013
I prefer weapons over guns
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#11 Mar 2, 2013
What folks expect an outright ban to be accepted ?? LMAOROTFU~! Nice weak post/point, for a putz. "man", why'd you bother with blather...
Ralph

Saint Paul, MN

#12 Mar 2, 2013
Knives are more dangerous.

1) Knives are silent

2) Knives are all fully automatic there is NO LIMIT to the rate of stabbing or how many holes a criminal can make in a victim and knives don't overheat from use

3) Knives leave no evidence to trace the wound to the weapon, as a gun leaves a bullet that is traceable to a gun to an owner

4) Knives are much smaller than guns making them easy to hide

5) Knives are available all over with no background check needed for purchase etc

6) Knives don't jam and don't require a second component to kill, they do sometimes break.

Guns are less personal with no need to thrust a blade into a victim. Guns are much more difficult to obtain. Being a bicomponent weapon needing bullets AND a gun to fire same a gun is more complex. Guns can jam and overheat if fired a lot and not maintained.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#13 Mar 2, 2013
I used a knife to cut a sandwich, the gun's ONLY purpose is to KILL...

Did you kill yourself, cutting your sandwich ??

Oh, there's a difference, huh ???

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#14 Mar 2, 2013
Jodi Arias used both.
Bushwhacked

Seattle, WA

#16 Mar 2, 2013
The NRA is fond of saying that "guns don't kill people, people kill people." It's a tidy little argument but let's get real: people with guns can kill people far more effortlessly than people with knives, deadly fighting skills or poison. The FBI has assembled evidence on whether stricter laws make a difference. For example, after Massachusetts passed a law requiring a mandatory jail sentence for carrying a handgun without a license murders involving handguns dropped by almost 50 percent. Robberies went down 35 percent. After South Carolina tightened its handgun purchase requirement in the 1990s, the murder rate dropped 28 percent.
Ralph

Saint Paul, MN

#17 Mar 3, 2013
Knives are more dangerous.

1) Knives are silent

2) Knives are all fully automatic there is NO LIMIT to the rate of stabbing or how many holes a criminal can make in a victim and knives don't overheat from use

3) Knives leave no evidence to trace the wound to the weapon, as a gun leaves a bullet that is traceable to a gun to an owner

4) Knives are much smaller than guns making them easy to hide

5) Knives are available all over with no background check needed for purchase etc

6) Knives don't jam and don't require a second component to kill, they do sometimes break.

Guns are less personal with no need to thrust a blade into a victim. Guns are much more difficult to obtain. Being a bicomponent weapon needing bullets AND a gun to fire same a gun is more complex. Guns can jam and overheat if fired a lot and not maintained.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Six Minnesotans tried to join Islamic State, fe... 35 min cowboy chris 7
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 3 hr litesong 34,161
6 from Minnesota charged with trying to join Is... 10 hr Important 3
NHL playoffs!!! 11 hr space ace 15
Mpls. Police Seek Public's Help Finding Teenage... 16 hr Important 3
Topix Censorship! 17 hr Affleck SlaveTrader 6
Africa Boat People 21 hr NoseBone 12
More from around the web

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]