Premiums for family health plans hit ...

Premiums for family health plans hit $15745

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Affordable Care Act

Saint Paul, MN

#1 Sep 11, 2012
WASHINGTON (AP)-- It sounds like good news: Annual premiums for job-based family health plans went up only 4% this year.

But hang on to your wallets: Premiums averaged $15,745, with employees paying more than $4,300 of that, a glaring reminder that the problem of unaffordable medical care is anything but solved.

The annual employer survey released Tuesday by two major research groups also highlighted another disturbing trend: Employees at companies with many low-wage workers pay more for skimpier insurance than their counterparts at upscale firms.

Overall, "it's historically a very moderate increase in premiums," said Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which conducted the survey with the Health Research & Educational Trust.

"But even a moderate increase feels really big to workers when their wages are flat or falling," he said. The rise in premiums easily outpaced workers' raises and inflation.

Following a 9% hike in premiums last year, the 2012 increase quickly became fodder for the political debate. Republicans said President Barack Obama's promises to control health care costs ring hollow.

But the most significant cost-control measures in the new law have yet to take effect, and the president's big push to cover the uninsured doesn't start until 2014. Those measures include a new tax on the most expensive insurance plans and a powerful board to keep Medicare spending manageable.

Trying to head off critics, the administration issued a report estimating that consumers have saved $2 billion as a result of the health care law. That's due to a combination of insurance rebates for employers and individual policy holders, as well as closer state oversight of proposed rate increases, facilitated by the new health care law.

Still, the Kaiser survey shows premiums for job-based family coverage rose nearly $2,400 since 2009, with a corresponding increase of nearly $800 for employee-only coverage.

"We aren't happy to see any increase in health insurance premiums," said Gary Cohen, head of the Obama administration's Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, adding that officials are "heartened" it was only a modest rise this year and look forward to slowing costs more as more provisions of the health care law take effect.

Most independent experts say the fact that premiums keep rising faster than inflation reflects underlying problems with the health care system that have frustrated policymakers of both parties for years, as well as corporate benefit managers.

Indeed, only last week an arm of the National Academy of Sciences estimated that about 30 cents of every dollar spent on health care ??$750 billion a year ?? is wasted through unnecessary procedures, cumbersome paperwork, uncoordinated care and fraud.

Obama says he's working to make health care more affordable for all by leveraging the power of government programs like Medicare to pay hospitals and doctors for quality results, rather than sheer volume of tests and procedures. But that will take time.

Republican Mitt Romney wants to give future retirees a fixed amount of money to pick either private insurance or a government plan modeled on Medicare. He expects the private market will find ways to deliver quality service at lower cost.

The GOP approach mirrors the shift away from traditional pensions, which pay a standard benefit, to 401(k) savings plans that limit the employer's exposure.

[continued]
Affordable Care Act

Saint Paul, MN

#2 Sep 11, 2012
The Kaiser/HRET survey found that employee-only coverage went up 3% this year, with annual premiums averaging $5,615. Companies usually pick up a larger share of the cost for employee-only coverage, so workers typically paid about $950 of that.

The availability of employer-based coverage, a mainstay for working people and their families, remained stable this year, with 61% of companies offering health benefits. However, only half of companies with 3 to 9 workers offered health insurance, while virtually all large firms with 1,000 or more employees did so.

Companies continued shifting costs to their workers, at a somewhat slower pace. A trend toward steering employees into plans with high annual deductibles eased a bit. The deductible is the amount you must pay each year before insurance kicks in. The survey found that 34% of workers are in plans with annual deductibles of at least $1,000 for single coverage, up from 31% in 2011.

"We don't know if it's a timeout, or if it's reached some natural limit," said Altman. "It's really something to watch for in the future because (high deductible plans) have an impact both on people's budgets and on holding down overall costs."

The survey's focus on health insurance provided to lower-wage workers highlights one of the major areas of uncertainty around the new health care law.

If the president is reelected and the law goes into full effect, employers with lots of low-wage workers may be tempted to drop coverage and send their employees into new state-based insurance exchanges, markets that will offer taxpayer-subsidized private insurance.

A separate survey this summer by the Mercer benefits consulting firm found that 9% of employers in the retail and hospitality industries say it's likely they will drop coverage, even if they have to pay penalties to the government.

The survey found that workers in lower-wage companies pay $4,977 toward the cost of family coverage, compared with an average $4,316 for all workers. And the policy they get for their money is less generous, typically worth about $1,000 less.

"They are really paying more and getting less," said Altman.

Although employers and government are doubling down on efforts to keep health care costs manageable, most experts believe the sluggish economy provides the likeliest explanation for the moderate rise in premiums. Last year's spike is blamed on a mistaken bet by insurers that the economy would recover faster.

The survey includes more than 2,000 small and large employers. Asked what kind of increase they're expecting for 2013, employers said their best estimate at this point is 7%-- sure to prompt more pain.

“Earn it one day at a time”

Since: Sep 09

Madison WI

#3 Sep 11, 2012
Obamacare already has two lies. Rates went up and so did our premiums.

Not surprising when 30 million want a free lunch
The Truth

Saint Paul, MN

#4 Sep 11, 2012
Jeffrey MacDonald wrote:
Obamacare already has two lies. Rates went up and so did our premiums.
Not surprising when 30 million want a free lunch
Can you name a recent year that health insurance rates DIDN'T go up?

That's like blaming Obama because it rained this year.
it is a tax

Minneapolis, MN

#5 Sep 11, 2012
Jeffrey MacDonald wrote:
Obamacare already has two lies. Rates went up and so did our premiums.
Not surprising when 30 million want a free lunch
obamacare is a huge TAX on all the people that are paying for others. Stop people from entering this country and using our hospital systems for their health care needs - go back to your country and use the socialist system in place.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#6 Sep 11, 2012
How is it a huge tax ?? How much ? Who pays it and what do they get for it ??? What About Rawmoneycare ?? Lotta questions, but you just write tripe.... LMAOROTFu~!
Disaster

Portland, MO

#7 Sep 11, 2012
Slew has no job so he don't count.

But for the rest of us, the middle class they get a $3500 annual tax increase plus higher rates and premiums to pay for this low grade dog meat of healthcare.
Arch on Schmahl

Saint Paul, MN

#8 Sep 11, 2012
it is a tax wrote:
<quoted text>
obamacare is a huge TAX on all the people that are paying for others. Stop people from entering this country and using our hospital systems for their health care needs - go back to your country and use the socialist system in place.
Obviously you skipped your seventh grade civics class if you don't know what a tax is.

Go back to your vodka and cartoons.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#9 Sep 11, 2012
Disaster wrote:
Slew has no job so he don't count.
But for the rest of us, the middle class they get a $3500 annual tax increase plus higher rates and premiums to pay for this low grade dog meat of healthcare.
It would be doesn't and since you're clueless about me, it's funny you'd lie...
one percent

Minneapolis, MN

#10 Sep 11, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>It would be doesn't and since you're clueless about me, it's funny you'd lie...
here is a fact:

1 % of the American tax payers pay 90 % of the tax in America. Why is that fair ? It is not we all need to pay taxes, 50 % of Americans pay no tax at all ?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#11 Sep 11, 2012
Not a fact, again...... Look up your lies...
Toidi Slayer

Saint Paul, MN

#12 Sep 12, 2012
one percent wrote:
<quoted text>
here is a fact:
1 % of the American tax payers pay 90 % of the tax in America. Why is that fair ? It is not we all need to pay taxes, 50 % of Americans pay no tax at all ?
Complete fabrication, like most of the teabagger babble.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Republicans' worst nightmare Trump 6 hr Phineas 35
clinton probe extends to key aides 6 hr Phineas 51
dow -400 6 hr Little Boy Blows 8
News Fast food-style Middle Eastern lands in downtow... 6 hr cowboy chris 14
News Bernie Sanders' Secret Weapon 6 hr cowboy chris 3
Trump Mobile, AL Rally Outstanding 10 hr TOASTER 5
Obama word games 11 hr Little Boy Blue 15
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages