Rangel says Obama needs quotas
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#24 Jan 13, 2013
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
How many blacks have the Republicans elected to the Senate in the last 100 years?
I believe the answer is THREE. In an entire century.
If you want to start talking about racism you don't need to go any father than the Republican party.
Figure skewing, low integrity poster, there have been 4 US Senators elected from the Democratic party in the past 100 years. I guess that makes you a racist if you vote Democratic as well, using your own standard, slewche.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#25 Jan 13, 2013
Do you hate black SAND, non-sense NO INTEGRITY POSTER ???
Insistent

Grantsburg, WI

#26 Jan 13, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Do you hate black SAND, non-sense NO INTEGRITY POSTER ???
Sociopath,

You are owned.

Everyone on here despises your existence. Nobody likes you. The cool kids on the playground throw rocks at you. Miss Smith thinks you are a dummy too.

Poor Little Slewsie, Stuck on the Playground, still trying to get the BOI's Attention.

Pathetic!
Consistent

Minneapolis, MN

#27 Jan 14, 2013
blah blah blah Sociopath

blah blah blah little bois

blah blah blah racist crap

blah blah blah Phllips vodka

blah blah blah extremist rant

blah blah blah demokrats

blah blah blah more vodka please

blah blah blah Psychotic

blah blah blah asylum

blah blah blah gay escort

blah blah blah time to pass out now

blah blah blah damn I peed myself again
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#28 Jan 14, 2013
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
How many blacks have the Republicans elected to the Senate in the last 100 years?
I believe the answer is THREE. In an entire century.
If you want to start talking about racism you don't need to go any father than the Republican party.
Figure skewing, low integrity poster, there have been 4 US Senators elected from the Democratic party in the past 100 years. I guess that makes you a racist if you vote Democratic as well, using your own standard, slewche.
non-sensical

Saint Paul, MN

#29 Jan 14, 2013
non-starter wrote:
<quoted text>Figure skewing, low integrity poster, there have been 4 US Senators elected from the Democratic party in the past 100 years. I guess that makes you a racist if you vote Democratic as well, using your own standard, slewche.
Yes, there have been only 4 US Senators that were members of the Democratic party elected in the past 100 years. That's why the Republicans hold a super-majority in the Senate.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#30 Jan 14, 2013
non-sensical wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, there have been only 4 US Senators that were members of the Democratic party elected in the past 100 years. That's why the Republicans hold a super-majority in the Senate.
The poster made the argument that because only 3 black Republican senators had been elected in the past 100 years, Republicans were racists, and by inference, Democrats were not. We can talk about Democrats giving people free stuff to get elected later on after the low integrity poster answers.
redeemer

Minneapolis, MN

#31 Jan 14, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Nice "spam", not a man... LMAOROTFU~!
What's he been convicted of, that would preclude his election, again ??? Of course, you'd "rather" not discuss Batshit Bachmann, right ???
Sweet uppercut Champ! Ouch
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#32 Jan 16, 2013
non-sensical wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, there have been only 4 US Senators that were members of the Democratic party elected in the past 100 years. That's why the Republicans hold a super-majority in the Senate.
And why, following the same logic for calling Republicans racist, Democrats are racists using the earlier poster's own methodology. Only 4 black senators elected in the past 100 years? Democrats are racists.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#33 Jan 16, 2013
Yes, there have been only 4 US Senators that were members of the Democratic party elected in the past 100 years. That's why the Republicans hold a super-majority in the Senate.

Asked and answered, are your eyes full of "deadly sand" ???
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#34 Jan 16, 2013
Only 4 black senators elected in the past 100 years? Democrats are racists.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#35 Jan 16, 2013
Yes, there have been only 4 US Senators that were members of the Democratic party elected in the past 100 years. That's why the Republicans hold a super-majority in the Senate.

Asked and answered, are your eyes full of "deadly sand" ???

So, crass/con are democrats or you're a complete idiot...CHOOSE !!!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#36 Jan 16, 2013
Not answered at all. If the Republicans are racist for only electing 3 black Senators, doesn't that make the Democrats even more racist for only electing 4 black senators in the past 100 years? After all, most of the black people and minorities, according to you and Dumbo, vote Democratic. That would make the remaining white Democrats extremely racist for not electing black people to the senate.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#38 Jan 16, 2013
Tell the majority of minorities who voted for Obama your "opinion". Pretty sad, you're stupid enough to argue, when you're wrong.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#39 Jan 16, 2013
Unless you are speaking for the other poster, or are the poster using that moniker from Minneapolis, maybe you should let the poster that used faulty logic to justify his political agenda answer, although there is a pretty good chance that you are that poster as well.

Not answered at all. If the Republicans are racist for only electing 3 black Senators, doesn't that make the Democrats even more racist for only electing 4 black senators in the past 100 years? After all, most of the black people and minorities, according to you and Dumbo, vote Democratic. That would make the remaining white Democrats extremely racist for not electing black people to the senate.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#40 Jan 16, 2013
The numbers aren't the same and your "logic" isn't... Nice, you'd like me to prove your negative, but are avoiding my question.

So, crass/con are democrats or you're a complete idiot...CHOOSE !!!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#41 Jan 16, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
The numbers aren't the same and your "logic" isn't... Nice, you'd like me to prove your negative, but are avoiding my question.
So, crass/con are democrats or you're a complete idiot...CHOOSE !!!
You are avoiding the true logic of the statement, both parties have racists in them.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#42 Jan 16, 2013
I'm not avoiding that comment and that's not the actual argument.

So, crass/con are democrats or you're a complete idiot...CHOOSE !!!
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#43 Jan 16, 2013
So, crass/con are democrats or you're a complete idiot...CHOOSE !!!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#44 Jan 16, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I'm not avoiding that comment and that's not the actual argument.
So, crass/con are democrats or you're a complete idiot...CHOOSE !!!
Once again, the flaws in your logic are big enough to drive a truck through. I choose both parties have racists and bigots.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Hillary should pay for Benghazi (Apr '14) 5 min FOVR 50
Drop one word....add one word game (Apr '14) 1 hr Intrepid Surfer 318
Liberals and Conservatives 2 hr UncleSam 4
clinton probe extends to key aides 2 hr UncleSam 31
Minneapolis is a very special town 5 hr MarkS 43
Black Lies Matter to Disrupt State Fair! 5 hr MarkS 61
Ben Carson: #BlackLivesMatter misfire 6 hr LIbErals 20
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages