Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#48 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
We see the weasel, cheapo troll...
You weasel out of every bet you make. Why would anyone expect you to be different this time gay Slew?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#49 Jan 27, 2013
I see the weasel and it's St Paul(in trouble) slew...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#50 Jan 27, 2013
I made you an offer, go ahead and pass, you'll be busy..... LMAOROTFU~! Make stupid excuses, they like folks wasting government time...
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

#52 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
"they like folks wasting government time...
Sleezy POS who says little boys are his favorite toy. Tell that to your new friends at the FBI.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#54 Jan 27, 2013
How did you ever lose ?? LMAOROTFU~! EZ !!!

Now you'll lose more...

I said (bunches of idiots) bois, but keep dancing, the music is O-V-E-R....
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#57 Jan 27, 2013
How did you ever lose ?? LMAOROTFU~! EZ !!!

Now you'll lose more...

I said (bunches of idiots) bois, but keep dancing, the music is O-V-E-R....
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#58 Jan 27, 2013
The three appointments to the National Labor Relations Board in January 2012 were made while the Senate was out of town but potentially available to act on them.

"Considering the text, history, and structure of the Constitution, these appointments were invalid from their inception," the panel said.

Obama also used such a "recess" appointment last January to install Richard Cordray as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, although his appointment was not part of the lawsuit.

The suit started as a routine dispute between soda bottling company Noel Canning and the labor board, but lawyers for Senate Republicans seized on the suit as a chance to challenge the appointments.

The case was seen as a test of the limits of the president's ability to make appointments during a Senate recess, a power that bypasses the Senate's usual ability to block nominees and that dates to the U.S. Constitution of 1787.

At the time, the Senate was not officially in recess, meeting every few days for minutes at a time but accomplishing no work and with few senators present. Meanwhile, Obama's nominees remained on the Senate's calendar, blocked by Republicans from up or down votes on their confirmation.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#59 Jan 27, 2013
Poor stupid sand in your head...

Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.

The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.

The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#60 Jan 27, 2013
Poor cheap sandy, you like do-nothing senators, huh ??? Of course, teabaggers are all do-nothing, right ???
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#61 Jan 27, 2013
Too bad, you forgot the part where EVERY PRESIDENT HAS DONE THE SAME..

Poor stupid sand in your head...

Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.

The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.

The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#62 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Poor stupid sand in your head...
Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.
The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.
The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
Obama and the Democrats have no one but themselves to blame for this embarrassing political turn of events. It was the Democrats who created the sham pro forma parliamentary procedure to keep the Senate "in session" to prevent former President Bush from making recess appointments. Bush honored the administrative procedure; however Obama charged ahead and ignored the tactic created by his own party.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/24233/obama...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#63 Jan 27, 2013
The senate has been in recess now for years time to wake up and smell the roses.
Obama has out played the GOP on each and every issue... let's see if he is successful with the maggots of our society, the NRA.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#64 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Too bad, you forgot the part where EVERY PRESIDENT HAS DONE THE SAME..
Poor stupid sand in your head...
Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.
The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.
The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
If you were any better at playing stupid, your name would be immortalized in the urban dictionary. Oh, wait, it is..........

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...
1. Slewche

Someone who is being extremly slow or dumb.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php...
1. slewsie

An idiot, dolt, someone who talks incessantly about things they are completely wrong about.

But hey, it is your valuable source after all.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#65 Jan 27, 2013
So pal, what's posting nonsense words on the web PAY, again ???

Tell me ALL ABOUT our Michigan bet, non-sense !!! LMAOROTFU~!

Naw, I like your "methods" of finding, not finding, THEN LYING !!! LMAOROTFU~!
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#66 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
The senate has been in recess now for years time to wake up and smell the roses.
Obama has out played the GOP on each and every issue... let's see if he is successful with the maggots of our society, the NRA.
Obama and the Democrats have no one but themselves to blame for this embarrassing political turn of events. It was the Democrats who created the sham pro forma parliamentary procedure to keep the Senate "in session" to prevent former President Bush from making recess appointments. Bush honored the administrative procedure; however Obama charged ahead and ignored the tactic created by his own party.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/24233/obama ...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#67 Jan 27, 2013
Have another "Guiness", pal ??? Go to "Connicut", ZERO !

Go ahead and try to make your stupidity about me, again.

Same hypocrisy, that claimed I got a 15 cent raise, poor ZERO ??? Too bad, you're so preDICKtable....
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#68 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
So pal, what's posting nonsense words on the web PAY, again ???
Tell me ALL ABOUT our Michigan bet, non-sense !!! LMAOROTFU~!
Naw, I like your "methods" of finding, not finding, THEN LYING !!! LMAOROTFU~!
Obama and the Democrats have no one but themselves to blame for this embarrassing political turn of events. It was the Democrats who created the sham pro forma parliamentary procedure to keep the Senate "in session" to prevent former President Bush from making recess appointments. Bush honored the administrative procedure; however Obama charged ahead and ignored the tactic created by his own party.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/24233/obama ...
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#69 Jan 27, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
So pal, what's posting nonsense words on the web PAY, again ???
Tell me ALL ABOUT our Michigan bet, non-sense !!! LMAOROTFU~!
Naw, I like your "methods" of finding, not finding, THEN LYING !!! LMAOROTFU~!
Those "nonsense" words are from your trusted source, slewsie. Quit being such a slewche.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php ...
1. Slewche

Someone who is being extremly slow or dumb.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php ...
1. slewsie

An idiot, dolt, someone who talks incessantly about things they are completely wrong about.

But hey, it is your valuable source after all.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#70 Jan 27, 2013
REWRITING REALITY, again !!???

non-starter wrote: I found it, you just won't publish that you got it off Yahoo or Wiki answers ....

THEN the lies began, LMAOROTFU~!

non-starter wrote: No, I guessed, because you weren't forthcoming with your source

OR MY NEW FAVORITE-

non-starter wrote: I found similar postings on Yahoo answers and Wiki answers

You posted to the urban dictionary to support your position...It's called tampering and you're clearly a duplicitous/dishonest POS... Have a nice lie... Oh sorry, I surely meant life.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#71 Jan 27, 2013
The court not only said that recess is strictly defined by the Constitution, but recess appointments are limited to those that "arise" during that period. Presidents have made appointments during recess sessions for years. The practice goes back to at least 1867. In recent years, President Clinton made 139 recess appointments and President Bush made 171. Obama has made 32 recess appointments. President Reagan holds the record with 243 recess appointments. This ruling in essence says that some, if not all of those appointments were unconstitutional unless they happened between sessions of Congress and the openings occurred during that period. The Huffington Post reported, "under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid."

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Drop one word....add one word game (Apr '14) 34 min _Zoey_ 234
News Minnesota kids too fat to fight, ex-generals say 55 min S o t N 7
Centipedes are the worst! 1 hr DeShawn Malt Liquor 3
Please trade Adrian Peterson 23 hr Ribs n Chicken 2
Where did Freddy Gray work?? Or attend college?? 23 hr Ribs n Chicken 25
Vikings draft 23 hr Ribs n Chicken 3
News May Day rallies broaden to address police bruta... Sat Little Boy Blue 3
More from around the web

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]