Obama NRLB appointments invalidated by court

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments (Page 2)

Showing posts 21 - 40 of92
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Jan 26, 2013
 
Too bad, you forgot the part where EVERY PRESIDENT HAS DONE THE SAME..

Poor stupid sand in your head...

Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.

The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.

The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
non-starter

Burnsville, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Jan 26, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Amused Slew wrote:
Too bad, you forgot the part where EVERY PRESIDENT HAS DONE THE SAME..
Poor stupid sand in your head...
Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.
The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.
The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
Technically, the senate was not in recess while Obama made the appointments, that is what made them invalid.

From the story:

"Obama made the recess appointments after Senate Republicans blocked his choices for an agency they contended was biased in favor of unions. Obama claims he acted properly because the Senate was away for the holidays on a 20-day recess. The Constitution allows for such appointments without Senate approval when Congress is in recess.

But during that time, GOP lawmakers argued, the Senate technically had stayed in session because it was gaveled in and out every few days for so-called pro forma sessions.

GOP lawmakers used the tactic as Democrats had done in the past specifically to prevent the president from using his recess power to install members to the labor board and the consumer board. They had also vigorously opposed the nomination of Cordray.

The three-judge panel flatly rejected arguments from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, which claimed that the president has discretion to decide that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advice and consent function."

I wouldn't expect too much reading comprehension from you, that is why we all spoon feed you.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Jan 26, 2013
 
Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.

Sand in your empty head ???
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Jan 26, 2013
 
Do you have any idea how many recess appointments were made following the same path as this? Obviously not, Several President have done this. If it is decided that these appointments did not follow the rule of law then every appointee before Obama would be null and void. A GOP member would come in strike the gavel and then dismiss. No one would truly be dismissed because no one would be there except for the person striking the gavel. This is jut another ploy by the GOP to obstruct the law. Wake up! The only guilty party here is the GOP.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#29
Jan 26, 2013
 
Do you have any idea how many recess appointments were made following the same path as this? Obviously not, Several President have done this. If it is decided that these appointments did not follow the rule of law then every appointee before Obama would be null and void. A GOP member would come in strike the gavel and then dismiss. No one would truly be dismissed because no one would be there except for the person striking the gavel. This is just another ploy by the GOP to obstruct the law. Wake up! The only guilty party here is the GOP.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.
Sand in your empty head ???
My gay hubby is thinking with the wrong head again. The Court said this was unconstititional because the Senate was NOT in recess. In the other appointments, the Senate WAS in recess.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#31
Jan 26, 2013
 
unconstititional ???

I have no problem, believing you have a gay husband, fake slew.... LMAOROTFU~!
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
unconstititional ???
I have no problem, believing you have a gay husband, fake slew.... LMAOROTFU~!
Isn't it wonderful that the gay boi from Seattle is still capable of being the Spell Check Queen on Topix? No need to add to the discussion. Just be our little spell checker.
non-starter

Burnsville, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#33
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Do you have any idea how many recess appointments were made following the same path as this? Obviously not, Several President have done this. If it is decided that these appointments did not follow the rule of law then every appointee before Obama would be null and void. A GOP member would come in strike the gavel and then dismiss. No one would truly be dismissed because no one would be there except for the person striking the gavel. This is jut another ploy by the GOP to obstruct the law. Wake up! The only guilty party here is the GOP.
The argument is that the senate was not in recess, but still in session. Try to keep up.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#35
Jan 26, 2013
 
Too bad, you forgot the part where EVERY PRESIDENT HAS DONE THE SAME..

Poor stupid sand in your head...

Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.

The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.

The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Too bad, you forgot the part where EVERY PRESIDENT HAS DONE THE SAME..
Poor stupid sand in your head...
Under the court's decision, 285 recess appointments made by presidents between 1867 and 2004 would be invalid.
The Justice Department hinted that the administration would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decision, which was rendered by three conservative judges appointed by Republican presidents. "We disagree with the court's ruling and believe that the president's recess appointments are constitutionally sound," the statement said.
The court acknowledged that the ruling conflicts with what some other federal appeals courts have held about when recess appointments are valid, which only added to the likelihood of an appeal to the high court.
Too bad the gay Slew from Seattle forgot that the Court said it was Unconstitutional.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Jan 26, 2013
 
Happy to bet it will be overturned, but you're a POS COWARD, right ???
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Happy to bet it will be overturned, but you're a POS COWARD, right ???
The gay Slew from Seattle has never showed up to a challenge and never paid up on a bet he lost. No reason to think you have turned over a new leaf.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Jan 26, 2013
 
Are you dodging my bet offer, cantgetitup ???

Not a man among you cheap children ! LMAOROTFU~!

Pretty funny, the "no show's" EVERY-TIME, also lost the election !
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Are you dodging my bet offer, cantgetitup ???
Not a man among you cheap children ! LMAOROTFU~!
Pretty funny, the "no show's" EVERY-TIME, also lost the election !
You, the gay Slew from Seattle, have never shown up to one of your challenges or paid off one of the bets you lost. Skunks don't change their stripes.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Jan 26, 2013
 
Accept THE WAGER !!!

COME ON, LESS EXCUSES ~!!

COWARD !
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Accept THE WAGER !!!
COME ON, LESS EXCUSES ~!!
COWARD !
You, the gay Slew from Seattle, have never shown up to one of your challenges or paid off one of the bets you lost. Skunks don't change their stripes.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Jan 26, 2013
 
Divert, deflect, distance yourself, COWARD !!

I'm making an offer, didn't your parents make a man ??? LMAOROTFU~!

10k says it's overturned, come on "hero" ???

I see NONE STEPPING UP !!!
Amused Slew

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Jan 26, 2013
 
Amused Slew wrote:
Divert, deflect, distance yourself, COWARD !!
I'm making an offer, didn't your parents make a man ??? LMAOROTFU~!
10k says it's overturned, come on "hero" ???
I see NONE STEPPING UP !!!
You weasel out of every bet you make. Why would anyone expect you to be different this time gay Slew?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Jan 27, 2013
 
We see the weasel, cheapo troll...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 21 - 40 of92
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••