Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#85 Jan 11, 2013
GO ahead and write for me if you wish, I'll do the same for you. I found many links and 1930's horse racing isn't applicable to the discussion. As for being wrong, you lost this race, pal.
Bridgework

Lincoln, NE

#86 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Of course, shoo-in being a 30's horse racing term is your best "work" right ??? LMAOROTFU~! Don't buy IMMR, you're bad karma....
Shoo-in is NOT a 30's horse racing term. That is its suspected origin, but not its meaning.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#87 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
GO ahead and write for me if you wish, I'll do the same for you. I found many links and 1930's horse racing isn't applicable to the discussion. As for being wrong, you lost this race, pal.
I didn't lose any race, either you were and are wrong, or the urban dictionary is a good source for you. Your choice, mr extremely low integrity poster.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#88 Jan 11, 2013
..not "it's" meaning ??? Yep, you're disqualified.

"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#89 Jan 11, 2013
non-starter wrote:
<quoted text>I didn't lose any race, either you were and are wrong, or the urban dictionary is a good source for you. Your choice, mr extremely low integrity poster.
It a source, you've tampered with.... Get a life and avoid my stock tips. Your sickness might be contagious.
yahoo-
"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#90 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
..not "it's" meaning ??? Yep, you're disqualified.
"a shoe in" means you have one foot in the door...he's a shoe in for the job...meaning he has a good chance of the getting the job.
"shoo in" is a racetrack term applied to a horse that is expected to win a race, because the race is fixed.
Really, back to the director of spelling, punctuation, and grammar again to make your worthless "points"? Maybe you should correct yourself occasionally mr low integrity poster.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#91 Jan 11, 2013
I get it, when someone besides me makes a mistake, we don't write hundreds of posts, right loser putz ???

Seem "rational" to you... Now slobber on his feet trolls...
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#92 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I get it, when someone besides me makes a mistake, we don't write hundreds of posts, right loser putz ???
Seem "rational" to you... Now slobber on his feet trolls...
One of your mistakes is posting on here about other's spelling mistakes. I don't have time to go into most of the rest right now mr low integrity poster. As for hundreds of posts, even that many verifying your mistakes in stunning fashion, verified by multiple sources, cannot penetrate your arrogant psychosis.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#93 Jan 11, 2013
Have another "Guiness"....
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#94 Jan 11, 2013
I like the low integrity, from a moron who changed/warped an internet tool to "benefit" your "childish problems".
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#95 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Have another "Guiness"....
When your IQ gets to 60, sell, you don't want to be lowballed. You are certainly a shoo-in for the lowest integrity poster of the Minneapolis Forum of Topix.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#96 Jan 11, 2013
When your maturity tops ZERO... Never mind, can't happen... You're drunk on "Guiness", right ? Poor loser...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#98 Jan 11, 2013
I like preteen/pretend stories, I see you do, too !!?
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#99 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I like preteen/pretend stories, I see you do, too !!?
Maybe you should put a bet on whether the charges will be dropped mr low integrity poster. If they are valid charges, they will get a conviction, if not, the charges will be dropped or the man will get off. Get your mythical bet out to back up your crap, we all know you would never pay, mr low integrity poster.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#100 Jan 11, 2013
Wow !?? It was so "impotent" you repeated your mindless challenge.... Shhh... it's time for the men to talk.
protect yourself

United States

#101 Jan 11, 2013
we have been living in a socialist country going on 4 yrs, with the dictator barry soetoro at the wheel, and he is going to try to destroy the America we love, with Christian conservative vales.
Smart Liberal wrote:
Are we now living in a Police State? This guy is being charged under a healthcare law. WTF is going on with that?
----------
Little Canada man videotaped sheriff's deputies, and got charged for it
By Emily Gurnon
Updated: 01/08/2013 05:44:53 PM CST
Andrew Henderson watched as Ramsey County sheriff's deputies frisked a bloody-faced man outside his Little Canada apartment building. Paramedics then loaded the man, a stranger to Henderson, into an ambulance.
Henderson, 28, took out his small handheld video camera and began recording. It's something he does regularly with law enforcement.
But what happened next was different. The deputy, Jacqueline Muellner, approached him and snatched the camera from his hand, Henderson said.
"We'll just take this for evidence," Muellner said. Their voices were recorded on Henderson's cellphone as they spoke. Henderson provided a copy to the Pioneer Press. "If I end up on YouTube, I'm gonna be upset."
Henderson calmly insisted he was within his rights to do what he was doing. He refused to give his name.
.
.
.
Kevin Beck, whose law firm prosecutes non-felony cases for Little Canada and other cities, declined to comment Tuesday, Jan. 8, on the specifics of Henderson's case.
.
.
.
The day after Henderson's camera was taken Oct. 30, he went to the Arden Hills sheriff's substation to get it back.
He gave staff there his name. The camera, they said, would have to wait, according to Henderson.
A week later, Henderson was charged with obstruction of legal process and disorderly conduct, both misdemeanors. He had been filming from about 30 feet away, he said. Henderson said deputies gave him no warning before Muellner took his camera.
The deputy wrote on the citation, "While handling a medical/check the welfare (call),(Henderson) was filming it. Data privacy HIPAA violation. Refused to identify self. Had to stop dealing with sit(uation) to deal w/Henderson."
.
.
.
The allegation that his recording of the incident violated HIPAA, or the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, is nonsense, said Jennifer Granick, a specialist on privacy issues at Stanford Law School.
The rule deals with how health care providers handle consumers' health information.
"There's nothing in HIPAA that prevents someone who's not subject to HIPAA from taking photographs on the public streets," Granick said. "HIPAA has absolutely nothing to say about that."
.
.
.
She had never heard of a case in which a law enforcement agency cited HIPAA to bar someone from recording, she said.
Kirtley, of the U of M, said the seizure and alleged erasure of the recorded material "raises significant Fourth Amendment issues for him ...The seizure here was not to preserve the evidence -- it was to destroy the evidence."
The Fourth Amendment guards against unreasonable search and seizure.
Henderson got a copy of the report the day after his conversation with Eggers. His camera was released to him two days later.
Muellner has been with the sheriff's office since 1980. Her personnel file includes numerous awards, commendations and thank-you letters. There are two citizen complaints from the 1980s, found by the office to be "not sustained."
Henderson said he does not intend to make a plea deal with prosecutors if one is offered.
"I'm in the right," he said. "If they don't drop it, I'm definitely going to trial."
Henderson works as a welder and does not qualify for a public defender. He is representing himself in court.
http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_223335...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#102 Jan 11, 2013
I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a smarter statement than that.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#103 Jan 11, 2013

Just because you have one doesn't mean you have to act like one.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#104 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and shit out a smarter statement than that.
When your IQ gets to 60, sell, you don't want to be lowballed. You are certainly a shoo-in for the lowest integrity poster of the Minneapolis Forum of Topix.
Amused Sklew

Seattle, WA

#105 Jan 11, 2013
I hope you're not speaking from personal experience, you'll NEVER MAKE IT !!!

Just because you don't have one, you don't have to compensate by trying to be one... Poor ZERO !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Muslims are a threat 6 hr Sheriff Joe 19
Minneapolis schools superintendent FIRED 14 hr Sunshine 8
Veteran Freed From MSP VA Dental Dept Phone Abu... 16 hr American_Sons 10
Man Shoots Self After Leading Mankato Police On... 22 hr DILF 49
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) Wed Earthling-1 33,452
Unconstitutional Violation of Separation of Powers Tue LIbEralS 1
Iggy Azalea to headline Target Center on April 30 Tue cowboy chris 1
Minneapolis Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:11 am PST

Bleacher Report11:11AM
5 Bold Predictions for Vikings' Week 16 Matchup
ESPN 1:37 PM
Pack name playoff captains before clinching
Bleacher Report 5:51 PM
Green Bay Packers vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
Bleacher Report 8:03 PM
Breaking Down Green Bay's Game Plan
Bleacher Report10:52 PM
Vikings vs. Dolphins: Breaking Down Minnesota's Game Plan