Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#64 Jan 11, 2013
Yeah, like why the guy refused to cooperate and identify himself ???
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#65 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Yeah, like why the guy refused to cooperate and identify himself ???
Maybe you should put a bet on whether the charges will be dropped mr low integrity poster. If they are valid charges, they will get a conviction, if not, the charges will be dropped or the man will get off. Get your mythical bet out to back up your crap, we all know you would never pay, mr low integrity poster.

Put it in print, under your own moniker, mr low integrity poster. After you lose, you will ignore it anyway.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#66 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Yeah, like why the guy refused to cooperate and identify himself ???
Do you know how Mentally ill you are?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#67 Jan 11, 2013
Maybe, you should pretend it's OK to ignore a cop gun nut, that sounds impotent.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#68 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Maybe, you should pretend it's OK to ignore a cop gun nut, that sounds impotent.
(PLEASE! Ignore the armed officers)

Moron,

Do you know how Mentally ill you are?

By the way, Didn't the Doctors know what a Genetic Mutant you were destined to be when they discovered that you were the monster created by the Unholy Union of your Birth Mother and her Brother that bred her?

Would you be willing to get in line for a "Retroactive Abortion" to correct the Dr's Mistake in not Aborting you before you started wasting oxygen that is better utilized by single celled creatures?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#70 Jan 11, 2013
non-starter wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe you should put a bet on whether the charges will be dropped mr low integrity poster. If they are valid charges, they will get a conviction, if not, the charges will be dropped or the man will get off. Get your mythical bet out to back up your crap, we all know you would never pay, mr low integrity poster.
Put it in print, under your own moniker, mr low integrity poster. After you lose, you will ignore it anyway.
I like folks who make excuses to avoid a meeting, then pretend it was "the other guy" to salvage your manhood... Good "work".
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#71 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>I like folks who make excuses to avoid a meeting, then pretend it was "the other guy" to salvage your manhood... Good "work".
Not me, low integrity poster/poser. I have never been to Seattle except to connect on a flight. I notice you ignored the post however, how convenient to be a low integrity poster.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#72 Jan 11, 2013
I noticed you missed on a 20% run up, what did I ignore that was more important to your mini-mind ???
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#73 Jan 11, 2013
I have never been to Seattle except...

Nice pretend "logic" where you make a comment, THEN tell me you're not involved ?? STFU or man up.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#74 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I have never been to Seattle except...
Nice pretend "logic" where you make a comment, THEN tell me you're not involved ?? STFU or man up.
Sorry slewsie, not involved, and unlike you, don't have to man up. I use Webster's for my definitions and spelling references.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#75 Jan 11, 2013
You can't man up and Websters is nice for college papers... If you prefer it, most of your writing is certainly the mark of a complete hypocrite.
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#76 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
You can't man up and Websters is nice for college papers... If you prefer it, most of your writing is certainly the mark of a complete hypocrite.
mr low integrity poster comments on choices of reference material, and won't stand by his own choice. Good one, mr low integrity poster.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#77 Jan 11, 2013
I made multiple choices, oddly you even named a couple... Since you altered Urban, is see your lack of honor and raise you complete contempt... Poor troll, still a ZERO and telling yourself lots of rationalizations...
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#78 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
I made multiple choices, oddly you even named a couple... Since you altered Urban, is see your lack of honor and raise you complete contempt... Poor troll, still a ZERO and telling yourself lots of rationalizations...
I think we all know which side all the rationalizations are on, mr low integrity poster. The urban dictionary is altered many times each day by many different people, some with only slightly better spelling, usage, and grammar skills than your own. You could man up and admit your best source is a crock, but I actually prefer you continue to use the low integrity route you have chosen to follow.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#79 Jan 11, 2013
Sure, the Urban dictionary is a growing changing piece of the internet....Too bad, you found it and altered it purpose, because you have no honor.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#80 Jan 11, 2013
Sure, the Urban dictionary is a growing changing piece of the internet....Too bad, you found it and altered it's purpose, because you have no honor.

At least, you're pretty funny on IMMR, where you complain I didn't tip you, but now pretend I'm losing money....(up 20%) in January.

You failed math, logic, and all the hard sciences ???
non-starter

Saint Paul, MN

#81 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
Sure, the Urban dictionary is a growing changing piece of the internet....Too bad, you found it and altered it purpose, because you have no honor.
Too bad you pick a source with no integrity to begin with, but it is to be expected of a low integrity poster to behave in such a way.
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#82 Jan 11, 2013
It had integrity and so did the others.... YOU DON'T !!! Poor zero...
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#83 Jan 11, 2013
Of course, shoo-in being a 30's horse racing term is your best "work" right ??? LMAOROTFU~! Don't buy IMMR, you're bad karma....
Bridgework

Lincoln, NE

#84 Jan 11, 2013
Amused Slew wrote:
You can't man up and Websters is nice for college papers... If you prefer it, most of your writing is certainly the mark of a complete hypocrite.
You are saying that the Urban Dictionary and Yahoo answers are more reliable sources then Webster’s, Cambridge University, Dictionary.com , the Washington State University, and the published book "Common Errors in English Usage"? You found incorrect and unreliable sources and used them because you can't admit to being wrong.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 5 min Meagain 33,206
any good whorehouses in twincitys (Jun '11) 6 min Space ace 17
Zimmer says the Vikings love and support Peterson 1 hr Letsgohoyas 18
Can't manage the gov & NOT honest or trustworthy (Nov '13) 1 hr Capt Crunch 284
Autopsy reports on Ferguson Shooting 2 hr Liberal 33
GRUBER gate 15 hr Liberal 7
Al Franken's record, sized up Thu MinniAfrica 12
Minneapolis Dating
Find my Match

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:46 am PST

Bleacher Report 8:46AM
Waiter Randall Cobb Surprises Fine-Dining Packers Fans
Bleacher Report10:40 AM
Matt Asiata Injury: Updates on Vikings Star's Concussion and Return
Bleacher Report10:40 AM
Matt Asiata Injury: Updates on Vikings Star's Concussion and Return
NBC Sports10:40 AM
Is Adrian Peterson done in Minnesota?
NBC Sports11:00 AM
Nick Perry's shoulder could change Clay Matthews' role