Minnesota man fired ‘more shots than...
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#66 Nov 27, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
The comparison was used to identify someone who I would want dead! The example lead to someone saying they would rather have someone sit in prison for life and I responded I'd rather see them dead because they couldn't be released and enjoy life after killing so many innocents.
IMHO anyone who kills anyone is insane to some degree. I'll bet this homeowner will plead insanity based on the COPs ignoring his needs and his frustration with the breakins. COPs didn't do their job and the elderly homeowner did.
The Woodbury COPs loaded an innocent hostage with lead in public and they arn't even charged. This homeowner loads up 2 crimminals with lead IN HIS OWN HOUSE AFTER NUMEROUS BREAKINS and is charged.
Makes no sense!
The police were being shot at and mistook the hostage for the shooter. This "person" executed 2 kids in cold blood. Not even comparable or close to the same scenario. Once again he is not being charged for defending his house, he is being charged for excessive force in executing two incapacitated teens. I hope you see the difference.

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#67 Nov 27, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually I wanted Osama Bin Laden tried and spent the rest of his life in a cell (The same with the rest). Even if YOU wanted these people dead, that is not the same thing as wanting someone you are face to face with dead. Then to act on that feeling and execute a boy and girl is beyond that.
I agree. Killing is far good for the likes of those mentioned. Life in a 6 x 8 with no cable tv, no weight rooms, no access to the yard, no books, no magazines, no college classes, etc.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#68 Nov 27, 2012
Well, I am an expert on many problems, but in your case growing up is the solution and the patient is clearly incapable. Nice use of "on/of", I'm underwhelmed... LMAOROTFU~!
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#69 Nov 27, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
Well, I am an expert on many problems, but in your case growing up is the solution and the patient is clearly incapable. Nice use of "on/of", I'm underwhelmed... LMAOROTFU~!
Are your insults, constantly off topic posts, and taunts examples of grown up behavior? Would a grown-up care about a miss-used on vs. of? You should try to demonstrate that you are an adult before telling people to grow up.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#70 Nov 27, 2012
Are they ??? Actually, they are, but I get where at your level, you're an ignorant moron, right ??? LMAOROTFU~!

Well, I am an expert on many problems, but in your case growing up is the solution and the patient is clearly incapable. Nice use of "on/of", I'm underwhelmed... LMAOROTFU~!

IMMR up 34% TODAY ~! Fly like an EAGLE ~! LMAOROTFU~!
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#71 Nov 27, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
Are your insults, constantly off topic posts, and taunts examples of grown up behavior? Would a grown-up care about a miss-used on vs. of? You should try to demonstrate that you are an adult before telling people to grow up.
Ps- I didn't tell you to grow up, I said you're incapable... Not that there's any difference to a sloppy "thinker", like you... right ??? LMAOROTFU~! Pps- Topix invites you to leave, if you don't like the banter....
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#72 Nov 27, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>Ps- I didn't tell you to grow up, I said you're incapable... Not that there's any difference to a sloppy "thinker", like you... right ??? LMAOROTFU~! Pps- Topix invites you to leave, if you don't like the banter....
So in your grown-up mind saying "but in your case growing up is the solution" is not telling someone to grow-up?
bob

Minneapolis, MN

#73 Nov 27, 2012
If the Slew was not hit, the guy needed to fire more rounds.
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#74 Nov 27, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
So in your grown-up mind saying "but in your case growing up is the solution" is not telling someone to grow-up?
Since I also said you're incapable, try REAL HARD to figure it out...on your own... Poor moron.
Ps- You got a nice stock tip a month ago and missed some MAJOR MONEY, nice "adult" move. LMAOROTFU~!
Amused Slew

Kent, WA

#75 Nov 27, 2012
bob wrote:
If the Slew was not hit, the guy needed to fire more rounds.
Come to the dojo and mouth off....
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#76 Nov 27, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
Are they ??? Actually, they are, but I get where at your level, you're an ignorant moron, right ??? LMAOROTFU~!
Well, I am an expert on many problems, but in your case growing up is the solution and the patient is clearly incapable. Nice use of "on/of", I'm underwhelmed... LMAOROTFU~!
IMMR up 34% TODAY ~! Fly like an EAGLE ~! LMAOROTFU~!
Just to be clear, you consider insults, constantly off topic posts, and taunts to be the behavior of a grown-up?

P.S. is flaunting imaginary wealth the sign of a grown up? I am sure that you didn't look at the list of NASDAQ top gainers for the day and randomly pick one of the top 3.
Amused Slew

Saint Paul, MN

#77 Nov 27, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
The police were being shot at and mistook the hostage for the shooter. This "person" executed 2 kids in cold blood. Not even comparable or close to the same scenario. Once again he is not being charged for defending his house, he is being charged for excessive force in executing two incapacitated teens. I hope you see the difference.
This homeowner mistook the intruders for armed felons.

Is there another way of killing someone, other than in cold blood?
Didn't the Woodbury COPs execute the hostage in cold blood? Cold blood is a term used to incite the sheepie.

Actually he is charged with MURDER 2 not excessive force. Again COPs regularily shoot people more times than needed, how can they do that?

Incapacitated teens has no bearing on this case. As far as the homeowner knows these "teens" were armed and dangerous and inside his house and his house had been broken into numerous times and HE caught them "red handed".

Again COPs were aware of the previous breakins and did nothing. Now after the homeowner did the COPs job the Judicial System is going after the homeowner..

Remember the Judicial System NEVER goes after COPS for using excessive force after plugging a innocent hostage way more tomes than needed to incapacitate him. Remember in the Woodbury case there were numerous COPs who shot the innocent unarmed hostage. So they had protection in numbers much like a gang.

This homeowner was by himself in a dark basement with the sound of breakin glass and footsteps in his house, he was under intense mental pressure and saw no way out other than stopping the intruders. As far as a couple of extra rounds in each intruder, that is EXACTLY WHAT COPs do!!! COPs shot until their gun is empty with no regards to when an unarmed innocent hostage is a threat.

I trust you see there is NO DIFFERENCE.

This case resembles Travon Martin with photos of Trevon in HS with a nice smile and the current photo comes out and he looked like a gang banger.

Same thing here, these "teens" are innocents active in gymnastics and sports and look so outstanding, the girl/boy are cute, BS.

Let's have the truth!!!!

These teens were felons who put themselves in harms way knowing they could be shot dead if caught and took the risk entering this old guys house intending to steal and who knows what else they had planned.

Well they got what they risked, death.
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#78 Nov 27, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
<quoted text>
This homeowner mistook the intruders for armed felons.
Is there another way of killing someone, other than in cold blood?
Didn't the Woodbury COPs execute the hostage in cold blood? Cold blood is a term used to incite the sheepie.
Actually he is charged with MURDER 2 not excessive force. Again COPs regularily shoot people more times than needed, how can they do that?
Incapacitated teens has no bearing on this case. As far as the homeowner knows these "teens" were armed and dangerous and inside his house and his house had been broken into numerous times and HE caught them "red handed".
Again COPs were aware of the previous breakins and did nothing. Now after the homeowner did the COPs job the Judicial System is going after the homeowner..
Remember the Judicial System NEVER goes after COPS for using excessive force after plugging a innocent hostage way more tomes than needed to incapacitate him. Remember in the Woodbury case there were numerous COPs who shot the innocent unarmed hostage. So they had protection in numbers much like a gang.
This homeowner was by himself in a dark basement with the sound of breakin glass and footsteps in his house, he was under intense mental pressure and saw no way out other than stopping the intruders. As far as a couple of extra rounds in each intruder, that is EXACTLY WHAT COPs do!!! COPs shot until their gun is empty with no regards to when an unarmed innocent hostage is a threat.
I trust you see there is NO DIFFERENCE.
This case resembles Travon Martin with photos of Trevon in HS with a nice smile and the current photo comes out and he looked like a gang banger.
Same thing here, these "teens" are innocents active in gymnastics and sports and look so outstanding, the girl/boy are cute, BS.
Let's have the truth!!!!
These teens were felons who put themselves in harms way knowing they could be shot dead if caught and took the risk entering this old guys house intending to steal and who knows what else they had planned.
Well they got what they risked, death.
You damn well know the difference between cold blooded murder (executing wounded and unarmed teens) and a hot blooded killing (mistaking the person running at you for the person who is shooting at you). As far as thinking they had weapons (which is a lie because he never saw more than their legs while waiting for them and dragged the boy into the basement before executing him) once he shot them and they were lying incapacitated on the ground and then they are finished with a shot to the head, that is cold blooded, goes beyond self defense, and will result in him spending the rest of his life in jail. This is a case of two wrongs not making a right.
Amused Slew

Saint Paul, MN

#79 Nov 27, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
You damn well know the difference between cold blooded murder (executing wounded and unarmed teens) and a hot blooded killing (mistaking the person running at you for the person who is shooting at you). As far as thinking they had weapons (which is a lie because he never saw more than their legs while waiting for them and dragged the boy into the basement before executing him) once he shot them and they were lying incapacitated on the ground and then they are finished with a shot to the head, that is cold blooded, goes beyond self defense, and will result in him spending the rest of his life in jail. This is a case of two wrongs not making a right.
The homeowner was temporarily insane with madness and mental stress from catching two intruders red handed in HIS HOUSE.

Homeowner was by HIMSELF with no bullet proof vests, SWAT vehicles, a number of other COPs for backup, being able to see the intruders, he was all by himself!

Pulling the trigger on anyone is cold blooded murder, There is no cold blooded murder charge.

Finishing someone off with a slug to the head is no different than pulling the trigger until your gun is empty, finishing off someone with unneeded shots. Call it cold blooded or whatever you want.

This homeowner IS the innocent, the guilty are dead. Homeowner should get a metal for bravery for what he did.
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#80 Nov 27, 2012
Bridgework wrote:
<quoted text>
You damn well know the difference between cold blooded murder (executing wounded and unarmed teens) and a hot blooded killing (mistaking the person running at you for the person who is shooting at you). As far as thinking they had weapons (which is a lie because he never saw more than their legs while waiting for them and dragged the boy into the basement before executing him) once he shot them and they were lying incapacitated on the ground and then they are finished with a shot to the head, that is cold blooded, goes beyond self defense, and will result in him spending the rest of his life in jail. This is a case of two wrongs not making a right.
Why in the Fauch! are you typing to her?

Now you are her pal because you did not simply slap her down for being the Mentally Retarded Sociopathic Psychotic she is!

Note: she re entered her irrelevant cut/paste 4 times because you made her feel important!....

"Do not feed the Sociopaths"!
Amused Slew

Saint Paul, MN

#81 Nov 27, 2012
How about the benefit of doubt goes to the victim, NOT the criminals?
maggie

San Antonio, TX

#82 Nov 27, 2012
Jiggers claim that they are not responsible for their actions because they don't have any daddy's and thir mammies are all crack hos. This problem could be solved by adopting the little monkey's out to white families upon birth. But I don't know one white person that would want to be seen with a nappy headed Knee-grow.
Bridgework

Olathe, KS

#83 Nov 27, 2012
Amused Slew wrote:
How about the benefit of doubt goes to the victim, NOT the criminals?
What doubt? He broke the law and he is now the criminal. Do you have doubt that a wounded and incapacitated teen was dragged across the basement and then executed point blank with a shot to the head? Do you have doubt that the he put his pistol under the dying girl's chin as she lay gasping for air on the ground and executed her? Is there any doubt that those actions are criminal excessive force? Even if he is found to be insane (good luck with that) it will not change the crime, just the punishment.

P.S. I cannot emphasize enough that you are ignoring that he is the greater criminal here.
CRASSUS

Neenah, WI

#84 Nov 27, 2012
Lonnie wrote:
If I killed an intruder in self-defense, I'd call the police to report it.
This guy didn't call the police. He told a neighbor a full day later what he had done, and the neighbor called the police.
I'd dump the body in the river. Let the water wash away the DNA. A decomposed body will show up in the spring and give the family closure.
CRASSUS

Neenah, WI

#85 Nov 27, 2012
maggie wrote:
Jiggers claim that they are not responsible for their actions because they don't have any daddy's and thir mammies are all crack hos. This problem could be solved by adopting the little monkey's out to white families upon birth. But I don't know one white person that would want to be seen with a nappy headed Knee-grow.
Abe Lincoln couldn't have said it better!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mslms multlation measels 3 hr Libertards got no... 3
#Dump Betsy Hodges! Fri All libertards got 10
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) Fri UidiotRaceMakeWor... 36,891
Happy 420! Apr 20 TruDat 2
Fox news haha Apr 19 Davycrockett 1
U.S. Troops To Somalia! Apr 19 Davycrockett 7
North korea missile fail Apr 19 Davycrockett 12

Minneapolis Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Minneapolis Mortgages