Gay-marriage bill survives Minnesota Senate Republicans' moves to block it

Posted in the Minneapolis Forum

Comments
1 - 9 of 9 Comments Last updated Mar 13, 2013
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

#1 Mar 13, 2013
Gay-marriage bill survives Minnesota Senate Republicans' moves to block it
A proposal to allow gay weddings in Minnesota survived several moves by Senate Republicans Wednesday to block it, an early signal the measure likely has enough votes to pass on the floor.

Both on the Senate floor and in a Rules Committee meeting, DFLers who control the chamber defeated a series of Republican motions to postpone its progress. Republicans said they were simply seeking more information about whether it would cost tax money to allow gay couples to marry -- in court costs, state employee benefits and other areas.

While the votes were procedural, Republicans portrayed a final floor vote as a functional vote on gay marriage. That motion, which adds the bill to a long list of bills awaiting action on the Senate floor, passed 35-31. One Republican senator joined all but four of the chamber's Democratic-Farmer-Labor members to keep the bill moving.

Sen. Branden Petersen, R-Andover, sided with DFLers after previously revealing he supports legalizing gay marriage. The DFLers who went against the majority of their party all represent largely rural districts where last fall's election results, as well as more recent polls, show support for legalizing gay marriage is considerably lower than in the Twin Cities area.

Those DFLers were Kent Eken of Twin Valley, Lyle Koenen of Clara City, Dan Sparks of Austin and LeRoy Stumpf of Plummer.

While the bill survived its first challenge in the full Senate, that's no guarantee of its ultimate passage there. At

----------

Advertisement

----------
least one senator who sided with fellow DFLers, Rod Skoe of Clearbrook, said he did so out of respect for traditional procedure and didn't know if he'd vote for the bill on final passage.
"I'm undecided and even if I wasn't, I wouldn't say yet," said Skoe, whose district covers a large portion of northwest Minnesota.

The bill also has to get through the House, where its opponents have said they see a better chance to defeat it. Senators aren't up for reelection until 2016, while House members face voters again in 2014.

House and Senate policy committees approved the gay marriage bill Tuesday on party line votes. Backers have said a final floor vote wouldn't come until later this spring, after both chambers have passed the state budget.

On Wednesday, Senate Republicans produced a document they said shows that authorizing gay marriage could cost the state's insurance fund over $600,000 a year to provide coverage to spouses of gay state employees. They questioned whether it could also increase court costs or have other ramifications on state spending, and said the bill should be reviewed by the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees spending.

"I think it's going to cost the state of Minnesota a bunch of money," said Sen. Scott Newman, R-Hutchinson. "I think that impact is going to be significant. If I'm wrong, so be it."

But Sen. Dick Cohen, the St. Paul DFLer who chairs the Finance Committee, said any costs would be tough to estimate and likely not very high. He said his committee has rarely viewed the fiscal impact of judicial policy changes.

Gov. Mark Dayton has said he would sign a gay marriage bill if the House and Senate pass it. Gay weddings would be allowed starting Aug. 1 under the current proposal.

http://www.twincities.com/politics/ci_2278352...
CRASSUS

Green Bay, WI

#2 Mar 13, 2013
DSM Local wrote:
Gay-marriage bill survives Minnesota Senate Republicans' moves to block it
A proposal to allow gay weddings in Minnesota survived several moves by Senate Republicans Wednesday to block it, an early signal the measure likely has enough votes to pass on the floor.
Both on the Senate floor and in a Rules Committee meeting, DFLers who control the chamber defeated a series of Republican motions to postpone its progress. Republicans said they were simply seeking more information about whether it would cost tax money to allow gay couples to marry -- in court costs, state employee benefits and other areas.
While the votes were procedural, Republicans portrayed a final floor vote as a functional vote on gay marriage. That motion, which adds the bill to a long list of bills awaiting action on the Senate floor, passed 35-31. One Republican senator joined all but four of the chamber's Democratic-Farmer-Labor members to keep the bill moving.
Sen. Branden Petersen, R-Andover, sided with DFLers after previously revealing he supports legalizing gay marriage. The DFLers who went against the majority of their party all represent largely rural districts where last fall's election results, as well as more recent polls, show support for legalizing gay marriage is considerably lower than in the Twin Cities area.
Those DFLers were Kent Eken of Twin Valley, Lyle Koenen of Clara City, Dan Sparks of Austin and LeRoy Stumpf of Plummer.
While the bill survived its first challenge in the full Senate, that's no guarantee of its ultimate passage there. At
----------
Advertisement
----------
least one senator who sided with fellow DFLers, Rod Skoe of Clearbrook, said he did so out of respect for traditional procedure and didn't know if he'd vote for the bill on final passage.
"I'm undecided and even if I wasn't, I wouldn't say yet," said Skoe, whose district covers a large portion of northwest Minnesota.
The bill also has to get through the House, where its opponents have said they see a better chance to defeat it. Senators aren't up for reelection until 2016, while House members face voters again in 2014.
House and Senate policy committees approved the gay marriage bill Tuesday on party line votes. Backers have said a final floor vote wouldn't come until later this spring, after both chambers have passed the state budget.
On Wednesday, Senate Republicans produced a document they said shows that authorizing gay marriage could cost the state's insurance fund over $600,000 a year to provide coverage to spouses of gay state employees. They questioned whether it could also increase court costs or have other ramifications on state spending, and said the bill should be reviewed by the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees spending.
"I think it's going to cost the state of Minnesota a bunch of money," said Sen. Scott Newman, R-Hutchinson. "I think that impact is going to be significant. If I'm wrong, so be it."
But Sen. Dick Cohen, the St. Paul DFLer who chairs the Finance Committee, said any costs would be tough to estimate and likely not very high. He said his committee has rarely viewed the fiscal impact of judicial policy changes.
Gov. Mark Dayton has said he would sign a gay marriage bill if the House and Senate pass it. Gay weddings would be allowed starting Aug. 1 under the current proposal.
http://www.twincities.com/politics/ci_2278352...
Write a book next time pinhead.
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

#3 Mar 13, 2013
This happened in Iowa thanks to godless communist liberal judges and as a result STD rates are up since! Remember the only thing a guy person wants to do is infect normal people with Aids...
CRASSUS

Green Bay, WI

#4 Mar 13, 2013
DSM Local does not know how to summarize so let be do it for him.

He will now be able to marry his Somali boyfriend.
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#5 Mar 13, 2013
Do you consider yourself normal, but that's 2 strikes...
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

#6 Mar 13, 2013
CRASSUS wrote:
DSM Local does not know how to summarize so let be do it for him.
He will now be able to marry his Somali boyfriend.
We don't have Somalis' in Iowa.... you must have some in Gay Bay though
CRASSUS

Green Bay, WI

#7 Mar 13, 2013
DSM Local wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't have Somalis' in Iowa.... you must have some in Gay Bay though
You mean this whole time you thought you were just humping a black guy?
DSM Local

Ankeny, IA

#8 Mar 13, 2013
CRASSUS wrote:
<quoted text>You mean this whole time you thought you were just humping a black guy?
2010 Census

--Ankeny
-The racial makeup of the city was 94.7% White, 1.2% African American, 0.1% Native American, 2.0% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, 0.6% from other races, and 1.3% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.3% of the population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankeny,_Iowa

--Gay Bay
-The racial makeup of the city was 77.9% White, 3.5% African American, 4.1% Native American, 4.0% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, 7.2% from other races, and 3.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 13.4% of the population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Bay,_Wisco...

----Right Away I notice the high amount of Beans in Gay Bay
Bushwhacker

Seattle, WA

#9 Mar 13, 2013
Did you SEE 2010 Right Away???

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Minneapolis Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Minneapolis: A Hotbed For Radical Islam 20 min Sammie 68
ISIS eyes Mexican border, says bulletin 1 hr redeemer 6
Obama: "no strategy" on Isis. 1 hr redeemer 9
The 1% Should Pay Their Fair Share in Taxes 2 hr Go Blue Forever 23
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 2 hr Brian_G 32,482
Cambridge Mace's Lane Middle School Teacher on ... 7 hr redeemer 19
DHS considering new security measures to interc... 10 hr TSA Employee 22865 4
•••
•••
Minneapolis Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Minneapolis Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Minneapolis People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Minneapolis News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Minneapolis
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••