Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

Full story: Newsday

Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family.
Comments
65,581 - 65,600 of 68,991 Comments Last updated 3 hrs ago
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72454 Apr 25, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
.......What is hanging you up I think is that you are thinking that, for example, book = god. And that the tree over there = god. You are bounding god in discrete packets of matter.
But if you switch your viewpoint a little, and see a book, and the tree, as part of the larger process..... nothing is without God -(In hebrew this referred to as Ayn Od - there is nothing but God).
Therefore, if you practice, you can divine Godly messages from anything as potentially everything is all part of the greater whole. That doesnt mean that the messages are necessarily biblical commandments (Former Res - this turnip is really God, and I want you to rob that bank!) but could be feelings, insights, visuals, sensations, or anything else imaginable. Nor does it mean you intuitively can recognize these or understand them. Think back to the notion of a native-American "reading" the clouds - same idea....
It sounds a whole lot like everything is god and god is everything.

And if one believes that, then how can one possibly NOT believe in god?

In other words, if one is willing to just keep widening his definition of god, eventually he HAS to become a believer.

My head is officially swimming in god speak.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72455 Apr 25, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you love your wife? Yes or no?.
sometimes
former res wrote:
<quoted text>That part is binary. The day-to-day relationship however may take some work, some days way more than others.
Faith is by definition belief without evidence. The world is round, we have space pics!
And as you know it's all about actions more than simple ideas (faith, belief...). And your actions are those of a believer, one of the faithful. You walk and talk like that duck.
You know what and who your are better than anybody else, assuming at lest a minimal level objectivity.
But I just don't think a nonbeliever goes every Saturday, observes holidays, prays etc. I could be wrong, certainly have been before.
Understood, but I never really said I didnt not believe in God, more like I don't believe in the same God that many other people don't believe in, and that there are God concepts out there that reflect more of my belief than the God idea that you are agnostic about. Also, faith, as you would no doubt agree, isnt a static belief per se but more the practice of an attitude.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72456 Apr 25, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
This atheist would simply say that god is a construct of man.
I think god was created as man's attempt to understand and make some sense of the world and his own existence. And to give meaning to all of this.
I have no evidence there is "another reality" only man's attempt to make some sense of this one.
But as you admitted, you dont need evidence to practice faith.
And with no sure evidence either way, and an acknowledgement of the limitations of us humans to perceive only what we are biologically wired to perceive at the moment, no reason to discount another reality. Heck - the movie the Matrix illustrated one potentiality.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72457 Apr 25, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
It sounds a whole lot like everything is god and god is everything.
And if one believes that, then how can one possibly NOT believe in god?
Exactly!

however, I would amend your comment to "everything is a PART of God".
former res wrote:
<quoted text>In other words, if one is willing to just keep widening his definition of god, eventually he HAS to become a believer.
My head is officially swimming in god speak.
Or even better, as I have been advocating from the beginning, move of the binary paradigm of believer vs nonbeliever of "the God out there" - and onto other frameworks - which are more sophisticated in their treatment of the issue.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#72458 Apr 25, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
En la tierre de Maine, esta un restaurante se llama "LL Frijoles", mismo de la tienda famosa. Me gusta el nombre. Yo no estoy hispano, estoy judio.
Speaking in tongues? I understood most of what was said. The flying roll, my diary, said "noticias de manana.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#72459 Apr 25, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
It sounds a whole lot like everything is god and god is everything.
And if one believes that, then how can one possibly NOT believe in god?
In other words, if one is willing to just keep widening his definition of god, eventually he HAS to become a believer.
My head is officially swimming in god speak.
Do you mean Newspeak? Or have you just immersed yourself in the scriptures?
Ronald Adler

Bensalem, PA

#72460 Apr 25, 2014
Slow Dance Chubby wrote:
That's funny, when the faithful try to get me in the Mitzvah van I say, "no thanks", and keep walking.
It's happened a few times and I'm not even Jewish.
Was I being oppressed?
Yes. You were.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#72461 Apr 25, 2014
Slow Dance Chubby wrote:

That's funny, when the faithful try to get me in the Mitzvah van I say, "no thanks", and keep walking.
It's happened a few times and I'm not even Jewish.
Was I being oppressed?

Ronald Adler wrote:
Yes. You were.

Thank you and nothing follows, i do not call that oppression.

Imagine 10 christians that have come to Jerusalem with the intent to convert Jews to their particular brand of reading the gospel.
They answered the add, followed the course:' How to not take no for an answer', did the cross-walk and are now ready and fired up.
So now imagine you are the target and can't even move.

Are you being oppressed?.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72462 Apr 26, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
sometimes .
I'd say love all the time but some days like her more than other days.
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Understood, but I never really said I didnt not believe in God, more like I don't believe in the same God that many other people don't believe in, and that there are God concepts out there that reflect more of my belief than the God idea that you are agnostic about. Also, faith, as you would no doubt agree, isnt a static belief per se but more the practice of an attitude.
But how do you presume to know the nature of the god that I don't believe in?
Or that of any other nonbeliever?

My god concept is fairly wide open.

How do you know that I haven't (by chance) rejected the exact god concept that you hold?
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72463 Apr 26, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
But as you admitted, you dont need evidence to practice faith.
?? You mean going to church and following the golden rule?

Not sure if that's "practicing faith?"
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
And with no sure evidence either way, and an acknowledgement of the limitations of us humans to perceive only what we are biologically wired to perceive at the moment, no reason to discount another reality. Heck - the movie the Matrix illustrated one potentiality.
That's the agnostic part of agnostic-atheist.

Agree with the "unknown and unknowable" thing, at least at present. Would be tickled pink to find out it's all true, or that there was real Easter Bunny!

Similarly, you might argue it but I would call you an agnostic-theist.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72464 Apr 26, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly!
however, I would amend your comment to "everything is a PART of God".
This is what I previously called moving the goal posts.

As if you said there is a giant easter bunny and I said I never saw one.

Then you said. Well it's not really giant and I've seen at other times of the year
in my back yard!(I might just call that a cottontail.)

So if you just widen/loosen up the definition of what is god enough, then as I said, anything or everything is god (or "part of god") then EVERYONE by your definition simply has to call himself a believer.

Because how can I possibly deny the existence of everything? Tress? birds? I can't.

Do you see this? How can anyone on earth, using you definition of god, call himself an theist?

It seems you've committed extensive intellectual gymnastics/contortions in order to make the case for your faith. You wouldn't be the first one to do this.
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Or even better, as I have been advocating from the beginning, move of the binary paradigm of believer vs nonbeliever of "the God out there" - and onto other frameworks - which are more sophisticated in their treatment of the issue.
Or more obfuscation?? We can convince ourselves of lots of things, given time, brains and space.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72465 Apr 26, 2014
Although Ellison was raised in a Reform Jewish home by his adoptive parents, who attended synagogue regularly, he remained a religious skeptic. Ellison states: "While I think I am religious in one sense, the particular dogmas of Judaism are not dogmas I subscribe to. I don't believe that they are real. They're interesting stories. They're interesting mythology, and I certainly respect people who believe these are literally true, but I don't. I see no evidence for this stuff." At age thirteen, Ellison refused to have a bar mitzvah celebration.[8]

Larry Ellison
CEO and Cofounder of Oracle
Worth $48 billion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Ellison

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72466 Apr 26, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
I'd say love all the time but some days like her more than other days.
<quoted text>
But how do you presume to know the nature of the god that I don't believe in?
Or that of any other nonbeliever?
My god concept is fairly wide open.
How do you know that I haven't (by chance) rejected the exact god concept that you hold?
Actually, I admit dont know the nature of the god you don't believe in...the statement was intended to poke fun at the harder core atheists, to highlight that everyone has their own unique concept before they disbelieve in it...

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72467 Apr 26, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what I previously called moving the goal posts.
As if you said there is a giant easter bunny and I said I never saw one.
Then you said. Well it's not really giant and I've seen at other times of the year
in my back yard!(I might just call that a cottontail.)
So if you just widen/loosen up the definition of what is god enough, then as I said, anything or everything is god (or "part of god") then EVERYONE by your definition simply has to call himself a believer.
Because how can I possibly deny the existence of everything? Tress? birds? I can't.
Do you see this? How can anyone on earth, using you definition of god, call himself an theist?
It seems you've committed extensive intellectual gymnastics/contortions in order to make the case for your faith. You wouldn't be the first one to do this.
Its only moving goal posts if I am trying to defend a viewpoint. I am not. I am presenting a view point. I am not claiming that my viewpoint is the real way (ie. the correct way) to understand god. I am presenting it as the way I understand god. So it isnt my problem how others might label themselves or others, and as I mentioned a few times, the label paradigm you are using is not very descriptive either.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72468 Apr 26, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>

Or more obfuscation?? We can convince ourselves of lots of things, given time, brains and space.
Again, your bias is showing. You are determined to make this a trial where the validity of my beliefs are under examination. Rather than realizing that all I am doing is articulating them.

Part of the problem is that you are hung up on the framework of Western Philosophy and Christianity, if you would spend anytime learning about the issue from Eastern spirituality or nonChristian perspectives, you would see that there are entire descriptive vocabularies out there that move past classic theism.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#72469 Apr 26, 2014
former res wrote:
Although Ellison was raised in a Reform Jewish home by his adoptive parents, who attended synagogue regularly, he remained a religious skeptic. Ellison states: "While I think I am religious in one sense, the particular dogmas of Judaism are not dogmas I subscribe to. I don't believe that they are real. They're interesting stories. They're interesting mythology, and I certainly respect people who believe these are literally true, but I don't. I see no evidence for this stuff." At age thirteen, Ellison refused to have a bar mitzvah celebration.[8]
Larry Ellison
CEO and Cofounder of Oracle
Worth $48 billion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Ellison
Wasnt Oracle the contractor responsible for the debacle of the Oregan health exchange?

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#72470 Apr 27, 2014
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>Do you mean Newspeak? Or have you just immersed yourself in the scriptures?
April is almost done and nothing really bad has happened.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72471 Apr 27, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I admit dont know the nature of the god you don't believe in...the statement was intended to poke fun at the harder core atheists, to highlight that everyone has their own unique concept before they disbelieve in it...
Of before they do believe in it.

Doesn't everyone have their own unique idea of just about everything?

Rationalization is a powerful thing.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72472 Apr 27, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Its only moving goal posts if I am trying to defend a viewpoint. I am not. I am presenting a view point. I am not claiming that my viewpoint is the real way (ie. the correct way) to understand god. I am presenting it as the way I understand god. So it isnt my problem how others might label themselves or others, and as I mentioned a few times, the label paradigm you are using is not very descriptive either.
You are not claiming to know, I realize this, as you're an agnostic version of whatever it is you are, I would say a theist, you would say something else.

But regardless of the nomenclature/semantics, it still seems you've broadened the definition of god SO much as to include anything and everything.

If it all fits together and works for you, so be it.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#72473 Apr 27, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, your bias is showing. You are determined to make this a trial where the validity of my beliefs are under examination. Rather than realizing that all I am doing is articulating them.
Part of the problem is that you are hung up on the framework of Western Philosophy and Christianity, if you would spend anytime learning about the issue from Eastern spirituality or nonChristian perspectives, you would see that there are entire descriptive vocabularies out there that move past classic theism.
Of course we all have bias. To deny it would be disingenuous.

But my point was that we can put ourselves though so many mental gymnastics that it would be possible to convince ourselves that up is down and night is day. Nuance can be taken too far. At one point one has to shxt or get off the pot/the fence. Something at one level is one thing or it's another. And we can also end up old men sitting in a smoke-filled room uttering our muddled philosophy. But in the end, as Robert De Nero said in The Deer Hunter, "This is this."

Not there isn't room for nuance, wonder and questions. For me, abortion, affirmative action, even the death penalty (at times), welfare etc. Not all cut and dried. And of course the grand daddy of them all, religion.

But at some point someone says they believe in god of they don't. Or they say, sometimes or most of the time. I understand. "There are no atheists in foxholes" goes the expression. I hope I end up like Christopher Hitchens who said if you hear of him making a deathbed conversion, don't believe it.

But bottom line. I think a believer should likewise take a stand. But also as noted, actions speak louder than words, and so have they done for you.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mimbres Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Grant Co.---rotten corner of NM (Sep '11) Aug 26 Insect Trust 26
Mimbres Valley woman still missing Aug 25 Insect Trust 6
To ban or not to ban - the future of plastic ba... Aug 24 American Citizen 10
Dr. Twana Sparks (Dec '09) Aug 2 Shantane 44
Review: High Country Collision Specialist Jul '14 Jeff 1
Hall retires from magistrate judge post (Dec '10) Jul '14 Jim Spainhower 9
County restructures indigent application Jun '14 Concerned 2
•••
•••
•••

Mimbres Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Mimbres People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Mimbres News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Mimbres
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••