Why The Hoopla on Control--Part 1

Posted in the Midlothian Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 4 of4
Commentator

Richmond, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Apr 9, 2013
 
I believe certain things about the interpretation of the Second Amendment need to be made clear. All this hoopla that there can be no regulation made pertaining to the use of or possession of guns is not true. If there could be no restriction on who can have a gun or use one, then one must beg the question why are felons forbidden to have or use a gun.
And on top of that I didn't hear one word from the radical NRA about police in California taking guns away from felons. Federal law prevents the sale of weapons to people who have a warrant out for their arrest, have used drugs within the past year, were committed involuntarily to a mental institution or ruled mentally incompetent by a judge, are living in the U.S. illegally, have a domestic-violence-related restraining order against them or have a misdemeanor domestic violence conviction. People who were dishonorably discharged from the military or who have renounced their U.S. citizenship are also barred from gun purchases. Clearly then there can be restrictions on the use of guns or who can have them.
In all our freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights to the Constitution, there is a limit to that freedom because total freedom could violate the rights of others. Such an example is the freedom of speech. One of the restrictions on that freedom is you cannot libel an individual or make threats to his life or property. Also the use of profane language over the airways was banned. And today some stations still ban it. Take freedom of religion--you have that freedom until that religion requires you to murder or kill an individual. The unabridged freedom to practice Sharia law in this country as part of the Islamic faith which allows the right to murder an individual would of course be denied.
I am one for sensible gun control and have as such signed many a petition to that effect. All such petitions I have signed NEVER were to take guns away, only to RESTRICT their usage. I would not sign such a petition, as much as I dislike guns, because it is IMPOSSIBLE TO TAKE EVERY ONE'S GUN AWAY! And if just one gun remained in a person's possession that individual could terrorize or kill all those around him.
The NRA in its insane opposition to sensible gun control can't stand even one person not liking guns. Back a few decades ago, I believe it was Millard Tydings who lost an election for the U. S. Senate in Maryland just because he didn't like guns and the NRA went into a frenzy, which turned the electorate against Mr. Tydings. Just because I don't like guns and not even push for their elimination, I should lose an election? Should I be punished just because I don't like something? Suppose I don't like loud music am I to be punished for disliking it?
I think the old adage regarding freedom applies, "with freedom comes responsibility" And that can apply to the Second Amendment or any other freedom granted to us by God's or man's law. A gun in the hands of an irresponsible person certainly needs to be regulated. Even the right to drive a car has to be regulated to keep people from driving recklessly and killing or injuring others.
The part people really don't understand about the Second Amendment is that the people must belong to the MILITIA OF THE SEVERAL STATES IN ORDER TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS WITHOUT INFRINGEMENT. Unfortunately the militias of today, including the National Guard, are not the true militia the Founding Fathers had in mind. To get an idea of who the true constitutionally mandated militia of the several states are,one needs to study Dr. Edwin Vieira's and Devvy Kidd's numerous articles on the subject by visiting the NewsWithViews.com website. I believe that militia desperately needs to be established which would be the answer to control the run away and near tyrannical government of today.
Commentator

Richmond, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Apr 9, 2013
 
Part 2

We need to revitalize that militia and then all abled body people can bear arms without infringement. Let's set some balance on the subject. Guns are the favorite weapon to kill people; in fact they were designed to do so. Cars, most knives and other items were not designed specifically to kill people but can be used to do so, unfortunately,

Either the Second Amendment needs to be revised specifically to allow all law abiding citizens to bear arms or we must revitalize the militia of the several states as called for in the Second Amendment. Since the Second Amendment does not specifically bar people from owning guns, they have the right to have them, but that right can be regulated. And legal precedent has already established that fact.

Therefore until that amendment is re-amended or replaced the only persons legally allowed to possess a gun ARE THOSE BELONGING TO THE MILITIA OF THE SEVERAL STATES. Since that militia is no longer in existence or until it can be revitalized sensible restrictions have been allowed and will continue to be allowed.

In closing I would like to say this--the real problem for all this gun violence can be found from the Holy Bible itself which says "above all the heart of man is desperately wicked. The only way his heart can be changed is to accept Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior and to follow only two of His commandments and that is to Love Thy God with all thy heart, mind and soul and then Love your Neighbor as thyself in which thou shalt fill all the others. If you do this you will never want to hurt or maliciously kill anyone. Until that can be done everything else we do will be just putting another bandage on a never healing wound.

Since I don't like or nor ever use will use a gun my response to this situation is "Some may trust in chariots, some in horses and even some in GUNS, but for me I will trust in the Lord".
Queenx218

Petersburg, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 9, 2013
 
What is the problem with gun control?How does it stop law abiding citizens from owning a gun?
If you are doing the right thing nwith your gun you shouldn't be afraid.Mentally ill people don't need weapons at all.Assaault weapons are only used for the military.
Very good Commentator,me should and must trust in the Lord.
Queenx218

Petersburg, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 9, 2013
 
If you are afraid of Gun control,maybe you want to do something unlawful with it, like plan a massacre.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 4 of4
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Midlothian Discussions

Search the Midlothian Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Marriages destroyed by SSRI's/SNRIs - ANTIDEPRE... (Sep '08) 8 hr btd 6
Why They Hate Obama (Aug '13) 9 hr barefoot2626 11,437
Family and couples nudist resort events 14 hr Tom Yarrington 4
Battle Flag Mon VN Vet 2
Does anyone know the Local Pedophile Mike Dicki... Mon Jenny 1
richmond dmv driving route Sun New driver 1
Bill Rovi, unlicensed & uninsured contractor co... Jul 19 Buddy Mitchell 4
•••
•••
•••
•••

Midlothian Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Midlothian People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Midlothian News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Midlothian
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••