A T H E I S T

Clay City, KY

#166 Feb 1, 2013
Anti-theist wrote:
Typical filth from an ignorant fanatic.
<quoted text>
Awww.... izums widdle feewings hurt?

I'm a fanatic because I think it's funny when cowardly, weak people commit suicide for such a stupid reason?
Nah.
A T H E I S T

Clay City, KY

#167 Feb 1, 2013
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
Little hypocrite, don't correct the spelling of others when you can't spell yourself. That will be al, little hypocrite...I mean, "all."
<quoted text>
Leaving a letter off the end of a 3 letter word I've spelled correctly countless times before constitutes a typo, and you realize that.

Misspelling is when you write the word publicly as "publically." LOL

Hypocrisy is when somebody makes such gross misspellings as "publically" then complains when another leaves the L off the word "all" just because their feelings got hurt when they were corrected.

Nice try even though you "publically" embarrassed yourself again.
A T H E I S T

Clay City, KY

#168 Feb 1, 2013
Anti-theist wrote:
"I'm talking about when that free speech becomes religious persecution"
Criticising religion is not persecution.
<quoted text>
Can you read?
I am not saying "CRITICIZING" religion is persecution.
Why do you keep saying that?

People are entitled to criticize.

I am saying "HARASSMENT" is persecution. It is also illegal.

Understand now?
A T H E I S T

Clay City, KY

#169 Feb 1, 2013
Anti-theist wrote:
Here I am, criticizing religious claims, or any unfounded claims. I'll continue to do so. There's nothing you can do about it.
<quoted text>
Ironically, here I am criticizing YOU and YOUR idiocy and there's nothing you can do about it.

(Except continue to cry and whine.)

People can criticize. I have no problem with criticism.
As long as you don't HARASS these religious people simply for their beliefs (which is totally different from debating their claims if they welcome debate).

Learn the difference, kid.
You have to respect their rights too.
A T H E I S T

Clay City, KY

#170 Feb 1, 2013
Anti-theist wrote:
"No rights are being infringed. You have a right to babble on about your weird beliefs, even on a public forum, and I am free to pick them apart. You do not have a right to not be offended. You are not immune to criticism.
<quoted text>
How funny... this comment proves that you are the same person who posted before on here, because you said this to me in another comment when you weren't logged in. LOL

FYI: When I see hypocritical idiots trampling the rights of others, even if I don't agree with others' beliefs, yes, I have a right to disapprove of and criticize YOU.
Criticism is NOT illegal. Harassment is.

This link proves your comment wrong and ignorant:
http://definitions.uslegal.com/h/harassment

I doubt you will read it, because well... ignorance is bliss, so here you go. A little education for you:

"Harassing behavior may include, but is not limited to, epithets, derogatory comments or slurs and lewd propositions,.... impeding or blocking movement,... and visual insults, such as derogatory posters or cartoons."

"A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she:
Either (a) communicates with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm; or (b) causes a communication to be initiated by mechanical or electronic means or otherwise with a person, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, or by telegraph, mail or any other form of written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;..."

"Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor."

Online forums are a form of written communication.
Refer to each state's harassment statutes for more information (I know you won't) on laws regulating it.

Calling somebody profane or derogatory names because of their religion is considered harassment.
Directing profane or offensive names toward a religious person's god, despite your knowing the "god" is "imaginary" shows intent to hurt and or insult the believer. That is harassment and is illegal.

Interfering with their exercise of religious freedom by interrupting with such profane or derogatory comments or slurs, even in a public place is prohibited by the First Amendment and is considered harassment.
Harassment IS illegal.

Harassment is not the same as polite, "healthy debate" as you called it. It's not even the same as criticism.
You seem to think criticism of religion is the same thing as harassment and religious persecution. Why is that? Who told you that?
InternetGrammarP olice

Clay City, KY

#171 Feb 1, 2013
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
"That's dandy, but remember it's al your opinion and you're entitled to it, but when you start demanding of others, that is where you cross the line."
You misspelled the word "all."
That will be all for now.
<quoted text>
You actually registered another Topix profile? Really?
Your 11,000+ comments weren't enough with the "Anti-theist" profile, so you actually had to make another one?
Now, that is taking Topix seriously.
The irony of this post is not only that you struggle with spelling yourself, but that it's about "grammar." Do you realize correcting spelling is not the same as correcting grammar?

No wonder you don't have time to work for your causes. You're too busy creating profiles on Topix.

Truth time: Are you a disabled shut-in, Anti? I won't make fun of you.
Happy

Tazewell, TN

#172 Feb 1, 2013
Lucifer Jones wrote:
Why are atheist so miserable? Ive never met one that seemed happy and most seem to be filled with hate
I'm a happy atheist. As happy as any deist I've ever met and I don't think it's fair to say most atheists are unhappy. How many have you met?

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#173 Feb 1, 2013
Cry, it's okay. You'll get over it.
A T H E I S T wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you read?
I am not saying "CRITICIZING" religion is persecution.
Why do you keep saying that?
People are entitled to criticize.
I am saying "HARASSMENT" is persecution. It is also illegal.
Understand now?

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#174 Feb 1, 2013
So sorry hypocrite. "al" is a name and should be capitalized. That's different than "all." Don't correct spelling when you can't spell, hypocrite.
A T H E I S T wrote:
<quoted text>
Leaving a letter off the end of a 3 letter word I've spelled correctly countless times before constitutes a typo, and you realize that.
Misspelling is when you write the word publicly as "publically." LOL
Hypocrisy is when somebody makes such gross misspellings as "publically" then complains when another leaves the L off the word "all" just because their feelings got hurt when they were corrected.
Nice try even though you "publically" embarrassed yourself again.
InternetGrammarP olice

Clay City, KY

#175 Feb 1, 2013
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
So sorry hypocrite. "al" is a name and should be capitalized. That's different than "all." Don't correct spelling when you can't spell, hypocrite.
<quoted text>
Grammar is not the same as spelling, Einstein.
By the way, you left out your comma after the word sorry. LOL
It should say, "So sorry, hypocrite." THAT is grammar.
Don't try to correct grammar when you don't know how to use it properly.

Considering you spelled publicly as "publically," I'd say you're not the source for spelling either, Webster.

Perhaps, you could look into night classes, if you weren't so busy creating new Topix profiles.
Anti-HOMO

Clay City, KY

#176 Feb 1, 2013
Anti-theist wrote:
Cry, it's okay. You'll get over it.
<quoted text>
Post 168 finally hit home, I see.

Yes, I cried when I pointed out YOUR mistake. My eyes watered, my ribs hurt, and I couldn't stop the cackling.
Why would I cry because you made a faux pas? Answer that, Anti.

Seriously, look what you just did. You got called out (in post 168) for making the blatant mistake (in post 162 and several others) of saying that I said "criticizing" when I actually said "harassing."

Then, to try and save face, you said it must've made ME cry.

Oops, here come the tears again... ROFL
Anti-HYPO

Clay City, KY

#177 Feb 2, 2013
Anti, I see you chose to ignore the proof I provided for you on the question of harassment vs. criticism and the First Amendment.

I thought you were a debater who "welcomed" and "enjoyed healthy debate."

Look at posts 173 and 174. Read that tripe to yourself.
That is how you chose to showcase your debating skills "publically." LOL

You had to resort to commenting under multiple profiles and even that collapsed when you made a big grammatical error in the midst of trying to correct me.

Those two off topic posts completely obliterate any claim you've made to being an intellectual capable of standing your ground, and staying on topic with reasonable logic and rationality.
It also tears down your claim of never resorting to "low levels."

Therefore, based on your silly, immature behavior, inability to finish a debate, and your avoidance and dismissal of issues ("nah, it's your opinion"), you have established yourself as a hypocritical, cowardly, uneducated imbecile with the debating skills of a festered rectum.

Since you don't want to debate the issues anymore, how about we just agree that you're a moron? Would that offend you?
Anti-theist

Clay City, KY

#178 Feb 2, 2013
Nah, that's just your opinion.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#180 Feb 2, 2013
You corrected another's spelling, but you cannot spell. That makes you a hypocrite, hypocrite. You are now reprimanded. Do not humiliate yourself further.
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
<quoted text>
Grammar is not the same as spelling, Einstein.
By the way, you left out your comma after the word sorry. LOL
It should say, "So sorry, hypocrite." THAT is grammar.
Don't try to correct grammar when you don't know how to use it properly.
Considering you spelled publicly as "publically," I'd say you're not the source for spelling either, Webster.
Perhaps, you could look into night classes, if you weren't so busy creating new Topix profiles.

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#181 Feb 2, 2013
No space is necessary between the "P" and "o" in the name "InternetGrammarPolice. " You are unqualified to make corrections in the English language. You are an imposter.
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
<quoted text>
Grammar is not the same as spelling, Einstein.
By the way, you left out your comma after the word sorry. LOL
It should say, "So sorry, hypocrite." THAT is grammar.
Don't try to correct grammar when you don't know how to use it properly.
Considering you spelled publicly as "publically," I'd say you're not the source for spelling either, Webster.
Perhaps, you could look into night classes, if you weren't so busy creating new Topix profiles.
Lucifer Jones

Middlesboro, KY

#182 Feb 2, 2013
Happy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm a happy atheist. As happy as any deist I've ever met and I don't think it's fair to say most atheists are unhappy. How many have you met?
Probably 30 that will admit it, another 10 or so who wont.

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#183 Feb 2, 2013
That's just your opinion.
Anti-HOMO wrote:
<quoted text>
Post 168 finally hit home, I see.
Yes, I cried when I pointed out YOUR mistake. My eyes watered, my ribs hurt, and I couldn't stop the cackling.
Why would I cry because you made a faux pas? Answer that, Anti.
Seriously, look what you just did. You got called out (in post 168) for making the blatant mistake (in post 162 and several others) of saying that I said "criticizing" when I actually said "harassing."
Then, to try and save face, you said it must've made ME cry.
Oops, here come the tears again... ROFL
ANTI-COWARD

Richmond, KY

#184 Feb 4, 2013
Anti-theist wrote:
That's just your opinion IS MY WAY OF THINKING I CAN AVOID CONFRONTATION. I AM BACKED INTO A CORNER AND REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT TO SAY, SO I WILL JUST DISMISS EVERY POST AS "OPINION." THAT WAY, I CAN FEEL LIKE I DON'T HAVE TO RESPOND AND THAT'S A LOT SAFER AND EASIER WHEN DEALING WITH A CYBER BULLY WHO INTIMIDATES ME.
MEANWHILE, I'LL JUST GO AND OBSESSIVELY HARASS CHRISTIANS BECAUSE I FEEL THEY'RE WEAKER. THAT'S HOW I ROLL... BECAUSE I'M A COWARD.
<quoted text>
No, it's not. Prove it.
Stop being afraid.
ANTI-PUBLICALLY

Richmond, KY

#185 Feb 4, 2013
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
You corrected another's spelling, but you cannot spell. That makes you a hypocrite, hypocrite. You are now reprimanded. Do not humiliate yourself further.
<quoted text>
I am "reprimanded" by a person who kept misspelling words (and getting offended when I corrected him), so then he logs into a new profile to correct typos calling them "spelling" while his profile persona is about GRAMMAR. Then, the big fool ironically left out his comma and embarrassed himself "PUBLICALLY."

I feel so intimidated.

(I'm glad you paid attention and remembered your comma before the word hypocrite that time.
See! Education can be fun.)

Did you hear that, Anti? That was my cackling.
InternetGrammarP OLICE

Richmond, KY

#186 Feb 4, 2013
InternetGrammarPolice wrote:
No space is necessary between the "P" and "o" in the name "InternetGrammarPolice. " You are unqualified to make corrections in the English language. You are an imposter.
I'M CHANGING THE SUBJECT TO GRAMMAR AND SPELLING BECAUSE I GOT MY HILLBILLY ASS HANDED TO ME IN A DEBATE AND DON'T KNOW WHAT ELSE TO SAY. I HAVE TO KEEP MY RETORTS SHORT TO AVOID HUMILIATION SINCE I DON"T HAVE A FIRM GRASP ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND GOT CORRECTED DESPITE MY INTERNETGRAMMARPOLICE PERSONA.
<quoted text>
No, actually, a person's unique username can be any combination of letters he or she chooses.
You must not know what an impostor is.

Impostor: "a person who pretends to be someone else in order to deceive others"

Since I am not pretending to be you or trying to convince others I am you, I am not an impostor; therefore, my name can be any variation of yours. I like to do that because I know it chafes.

Grasp another straw, Anti.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Middlesboro Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 4 min Prez 143,168
Josh Barnett nice white chevy truck 3 hr pretty girl 1
Lock Your Cars!!!! 4 hr Watchman 7
Thought Brent Lambert straightened up (Mar '12) 6 hr an old EKU friend 7
Mugshots 7 hr Meee 9
Wet-Dry vote 7 hr Missing the point 62
Cashell 8 hr mission impossible 51
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Middlesboro Mortgages