Martinez vetoes minimum wage increase

Mar 30, 2013 Full story: Alamogordo Daily News 107

Gov. Susana Martinez on Friday vetoed a bill to increase the state's minimum wage by $1 an hour, to $8.50. Martinez, a Republican, blamed majority Democrats in the state Legislature for seeking too large an increase.

Full Story
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#1 Mar 30, 2013
Government has no business determining wages for private sector jobs. What someone is willing to pay for work, and what someone is willing to accept in pay for that work, is a decision that rightly belongs between the employer and the employee.
xando

United States

#2 Mar 30, 2013
......and government, then, should also stay out of people's private lives by determining the recognition and legality of a couple's marriage based upon gender and sexual preference of the potential marriage partners.
Wondering

Los Angeles, CA

#3 Mar 30, 2013
I was totally supportive of elimination of driver's licenses for illegals. However with this veto, we now need the illegals to drive to the jobs that no one else will accept at the current minimum wage.
xando

United States

#4 Mar 30, 2013
I suppose a case could, also, be made for child labor.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#5 Mar 30, 2013
xando wrote:
......and government, then, should also stay out of people's private lives by determining the recognition and legality of a couple's marriage based upon gender and sexual preference of the potential marriage partners.
I didn't see anything in the article that referenced Governor Martinez vetoing gay marriage. Please point that out to me as I must have missed it.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#6 Mar 30, 2013
Wondering wrote:
I was totally supportive of elimination of driver's licenses for illegals. However with this veto, we now need the illegals to drive to the jobs that no one else will accept at the current minimum wage.
Actually, illegals are part of the problem of low wages in this country. As long as there is a steady source of cheap day labor, it is not necessary for employers to respond to market demand and raise wages.

Keep illegals out, and wages will necessary increase on their own, without government interference in the free market.
xando

United States

#7 Mar 30, 2013
Cary L Nickel wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't see anything in the article that referenced Governor Martinez vetoing gay marriage. Please point that out to me as I must have missed it.
The illogicality of your reasoning is emphasized by parallelisms.
xando

United States

#8 Mar 30, 2013
Interesting. I saw nothing in the article referencing illegals. I did see, however, that "conservative" governor, Martinez, was willing for "gubmint" to approve a 30 cent increase.
Cary L Nickel wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, illegals are part of the problem of low wages in this country. As long as there is a steady source of cheap day labor, it is not necessary for employers to respond to market demand and raise wages.
Keep illegals out, and wages will necessary increase on their own, without government interference in the free market.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#9 Mar 30, 2013
xando wrote:
Interesting. I saw nothing in the article referencing illegals. I did see, however, that "conservative" governor, Martinez, was willing for "gubmint" to approve a 30 cent increase.
<quoted text>
Illegals are part of the wage issue. Gay marriage is not. But don't fret, most other liberals don't get it either.

30 cents is far more conservative than the buck liberal anti-business Democrats wanted. Governor Martinez was merely offering to work with the leftists in the legislature by agreeing to 30 cents..but they were unwilling to work with her.

Furthermore, I've never stated that Governor Martinez is as conservative/libertarian as I am. I don't believe government has any legitimate role in setting wages in the private sector.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#10 Mar 30, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
The illogicality of your reasoning is emphasized by parallelisms.
Only when leftists such as yourself need to defend the indefensible.
xando

United States

#11 Mar 30, 2013
Keeping government out of our lives IS part of the issue, as YOU stated in your original post. But, like most of you hypocritical kneejerkers, you have double standards. You're perfectly content for government to legislate according to what you see as "correct," but not be involved if it conflicts with your antiquated view of life.

Sooooo.......whether it's 30 cents or 10 dollars, it's still government being involved where they have no business, according to you.

That's why it's so easy to illustrate those illogicalities of yours.
Cary L Nickel wrote:
<quoted text>
Illegals are part of the wage issue. Gay marriage is not. But don't fret, most other liberals don't get it either.
30 cents is far more conservative than the buck liberal anti-business Democrats wanted. Governor Martinez was merely offering to work with the leftists in the legislature by agreeing to 30 cents..but they were unwilling to work with her.
Furthermore, I've never stated that Governor Martinez is as conservative/libertarian as I am. I don't believe government has any legitimate role in setting wages in the private sector.
xando

United States

#12 Mar 30, 2013
Cary L Nickel wrote:
<quoted text>
Only when leftists such as yourself need to defend the indefensible.
I will ask you this, although I know you will not answer, since you're merely saying words because you have no legitimate rebuttal other than repeating verbatim Rushisms.:

What am I defending that is indefensible?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#13 Mar 30, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
I will ask you this, although I know you will not answer, since you're merely saying words because you have no legitimate rebuttal other than repeating verbatim Rushisms.:
What am I defending that is indefensible?
What's a "Rushism"?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#14 Mar 30, 2013
xando wrote:
Keeping government out of our lives IS part of the issue, as YOU stated in your original post. But, like most of you hypocritical kneejerkers, you have double standards. You're perfectly content for government to legislate according to what you see as "correct," but not be involved if it conflicts with your antiquated view of life.
Sooooo.......whether it's 30 cents or 10 dollars, it's still government being involved where they have no business, according to you.
That's why it's so easy to illustrate those illogicalities of yours.
<quoted text>
Exactly. Which is why I always vote Republican. Or Libertarian, if the opportunity presents itself.

Democrats, aka "Liberals", are the modern version of the socialist party, merely disguising themselves under another name.

I will ALWAYS support the lesser of two evils...an it is certain that modern liberalism is, indeed, evil.
APPAUSEPLEASE

Albuquerque, NM

#15 Mar 30, 2013
Good job Susanna - you did the right thing for the state and all her people.

“I ain't afraid of no ghosts.”

Since: Aug 08

Dear old mucky Drasnia

#16 Mar 30, 2013
Here's the problem. 79% of the state said they wanted the increase. It is her job to represent the people, and clearly, she has failed to do so.
xando

United States

#17 Mar 30, 2013
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2005/01/03...

^^^^^^^^^From one of your own.

What do you consider to be the lesser of two evils--fascism or socialism?
Cary L Nickel wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Which is why I always vote Republican. Or Libertarian, if the opportunity presents itself.
Democrats, aka "Liberals", are the modern version of the socialist party, merely disguising themselves under another name.
I will ALWAYS support the lesser of two evils...an it is certain that modern liberalism is, indeed, evil.
xando

United States

#18 Mar 30, 2013
Silk_the_Absent1 wrote:
Here's the problem. 79% of the state said they wanted the increase. It is her job to represent the people, and clearly, she has failed to do so.
But that is typical of conservatives.

“Kees Mee, I's Ireesh”

Since: Jun 09

Ol' Juarez

#19 Mar 30, 2013
xando wrote:
<quoted text>
But that is typical of conservatives.
I would like to see Sucia support herself and Chuck on the current wage of $7.50, pay rent, buy food, gas their vehicles, buy clothes, shoes and toiletries. I doubt she would be able to do it, even if she bought her clothes at Walmart.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#20 Mar 30, 2013
Silk_the_Absent1 wrote:
Here's the problem. 79% of the state said they wanted the increase. It is her job to represent the people, and clearly, she has failed to do so.
Please provide the link to the poll which provided your statistic.

Regardless, in a republic, where our leaders are elected to do what is right, not necessary what feels good at the moment, sometimes the answer is just "no".

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mesilla Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 6 hr Eric 69,427
isis/isil Sun Sur 13 Beat 2
Former NMSU regent Laura Conniff named to space... Sep 19 OMG 1
Al Sharpton - Head Race Bater Sep 19 Kosher Frank 2
Gov. Martinez appoints Las Crucen to judicial p... (Mar '11) Sep 17 Poodle 12
Gang problems in Las Cruces (Sep '07) Sep 16 DesertLady 168
Robin Colts was not murdered by Debbie or James (Dec '10) Sep 13 Fact only 7
•••

Flash Flood Warning for Dona Ana County was issued at September 22 at 5:05PM MDT

•••
Mesilla Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Mesilla Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Mesilla People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Mesilla News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Mesilla
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••