Mars: All About the Red Planet

Our neighboring planet Mars has long been subject to question and speculation, so how much do we really know about the red planet? Little Green Men on Mars? Long a speculation of astronomers, the possibility of ...

[mars]

what features were designed into the mars rovers to make in land successfully on the plant.. how can your team use this informatino to your advantage?

[nicole]

its great its so intresting

[White Fire]

nicole wrote:

its great its so intresting

yes it is!

[truthist]

White Fire wrote:

<quoted text>yes it is!

Why? Would you share your interest? Thanks

[White Fire]

truthist wrote:

<quoted text>Why? Would you share your interest? Thanks

because mars a long time ago had water and possibility life that's what makes it so interesting.

[truthist]

White Fire wrote:

<quoted text>because mars a long time ago had water and possibility life that's what makes it so interesting.

Thanks.

If it had water a long time ago, why would that be interesting to you?

Also, why is possibility of life interesting to you?

What do you think life is?

P.S. Ignore those who are clueless about these questions. I'm interested in your view as a human being

[White Fire]

truthist wrote:

<quoted text>Thanks.
If it had water a long time ago, why would that be interesting to you?
Also, why is possibility of life interesting to you?
What do you think life is?
P.S. Ignore those who are clueless about these questions. I'm interested in your view as a human being

do you find mars interesting

[truthist]

White Fire wrote:

<quoted text>do you find mars interesting

I asked you first :)

I'm interested in your answers because I find people are not able to answer the questions I asked you.

[Lonewolf]

It would be more interesting if we had ever succesfully sent a probe there,NASA is a sham.

[White Fire]

truthist wrote:

<quoted text>I asked you first :)
I'm interested in your answers because I find people are not able to answer the questions I asked you.

i dont know what to say.

[truthist]

Lonewolf wrote:

It would be more interesting if we had ever succesfully sent a probe there,NASA is a sham.

What do you know??
We keep sending rovers, landers, orbiters, etc. What did you have in mind?

[cool]

cool

[Rub_It_In]

Lonewolf wrote:

It would be more interesting if we had ever succesfully sent a probe there,NASA is a sham.

Nasa wants you to believe they are an incompetent "Sham" so when they get results back form these missions deemed too sensitive for public consumption, they circulate rumors about their incompetence, and the people lose interest.

Nasa, a public company with the privelage of hiding any and all results behind the veil of national security, due to the fine print in the 1950s engagement letter, which created the agency, that basically says although they are publicly funded, they are also an arm of defense, qualifying them to not release anything they deem too sensitive.

[Rub_It_In]

Mars? I LOVE mars, I am fascinated with the possibilities on Mars, so many questions, so many ignored by the one agency that could answer these questions.

So as not too panic the public, they are behaving like time release aspirin regarding the discovery of life.

Keep feeding us dribs and drabs so when they make the announcement, there is not a "war of the worlds" type panic with a social breakdown in religion and authority ala the Brookings Report

[Rub_It_In]

Little known fact, the whole "we never landed on the moon, it was faked" theory stemmed from Nasa itself to suppress the questions of what was actually accomplished/found if anything on the moon. So the topic is brilliantly deflected from, "what was up there", to "we didn't even really go there so dont bother thinking about it"

National
Association
Secretive
Adventurers

[truthist]

Why do they want to do further and successive explosions on our moon via LCROSS? After all these years of visits, samples, observations, photographs, calculations.. and no possible prospect to living there

[brittany]

little green?????????? i need a pic!

[Rub_it_In]

truthist wrote:

Why do they want to do further and successive explosions on our moon via LCROSS? After all these years of visits, samples, observations, photographs, calculations.. and no possible prospect to living there

Why?

IMO, it is to destroy any controversial evidence of ancient civilizations living in glass (without water, in an airless vacuum like space glass is actually 2x stronger than steel) domes, along with castles, and spires that stand miles above the lunarscape.

Neil Armstrong first man to walk on the moon? Hardly.

Google the Navy's Clementine mission and look for yourself at all the blurred out portions of the lunar scape, with no plausible explanation as to why.

Once they remove all evidence via explosives etc, under the guise of science, then man will return.