Update on Cheshire Homicide

[Barnabas]

Check it Out wrote:

I can understand the parents insuring themselves to protect the kids, but why insure the daughters?

To protect the preinvested money to insure the girls schooling for one.

I am sure they paid ahead to insure the girls schooling at the school of choice was guaranteed.

And as guarantee's for the oldests college loans they had her insured to pay off any college loans.

In addition any parent of any worth who is a good parent insures a childs insurability. The best way to do that is with either a guaranteed renewable term for a large amount or a whole life for a large amount with a guaranteed issue rider.

This is done as a Child going to college is expected to have large insurance needs to protect his later life assets.

In addition remember it costs as much to hospitalize and bury a child as it does an adult in case of injury or illness so why not stop the baloney. The baloney has no basis.

[Check it Out]

Barnabas wrote:

<quoted text>
Privacy law would cover that. If there was any question the insurance company would have questioned it.

But that too, coulda been readacted.

[Check it Out]

Barnabas wrote:

<quoted text>
And fluffy what kind of stains do you have on the shoulders of your dresses?

You need to get together with "Just Another Poster". You two sound like soulmates.

[Just another poster]

Check it Out wrote:

<quoted text>So does that mean this thread is illegal?

Not unless people directly affected by the gag order (police, lawyers, witnesses, etc) are participating here.

[Puzzling]

This case has more secrecy and for a longer time than poor little Caylee.

[Haleigh Cummings]

We know from this case that the cops don't have to tell the truth about whom they suspect.

They can lie if the lie is in the best interest of the investigation.

[Cannot believe]

Just another poster wrote:

<quoted text>
Not unless people directly affected by the gag order (police, lawyers, witnesses, etc) are participating here.

You know too much. You must be a cop.

[Amber]

Any updates on this case?

[Check it Out]

Amber wrote:

Any updates on this case?

As far as I know it is just a waiting game until the trial.

One of the Posters - Just Another Poster - seems to have above-average knowledge about the case. Perhaps even insider knowledge.

[To Amber]

Do you think the father was involved?

[Great Point]

Jimbeau wrote:

When a trial takes three years to hold, and the facts of the case must remain sealed to allow a fair trial, something is wrong.

Gotta hand it to you.

[Amber]

Is the trial even scheduled?

[Just another poster]

Amber wrote:

Is the trial even scheduled?

Both defendants have pre-trial hearings scheduled for April 28 in New Haven. I believe the trial itself has been scheduled for January 2010.

BTW, this isn't "inside" information. It's public information and available to anyone with a computer and internet access.

[Amber]

Thanks for the update. I can't believe it takes so long.

[Carrier Michelle]

I live in PA, originally from Meriden, and would have to say that i don't believe that it's democrat and the economy is lousy because of the Democrats but because of the illegal drugs that are sold( Wallingford, Hartford...)that brings the economy down, drugs don't pay taxes..and dont flourish the economy like it's supposed to. Drugs buys things and puts money into the economy but not as much as it should had it been working....paying gas....State, Federal, Housing taxes??? I think that is what put CT in a Bind, along with president Bush and his stupidity.I don't really care that hes an elephant...you know Republican.