CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming

[Big D]

I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science

anything that has not done that, isn’t science, but is propaganda

You are being played the fool

[Big D]

There are some other conspiracy theories you should check out

There is one saying George Bush personally masterminded 911 and ordered the demolition of the world trade center.

If you are not already on the moon landings were faked train, that is a good one for you.

And of course the old standby of birthers

How about the one about the Jewish control of the banking industry

And of course Atlantis

Ancient aliens

and my personal favorite, that JFK is alive and well and living in Cuba sharing an apartment with Elvis that they rent from Jimmy Hoffa

None of these "theories" have been submitted to the scientific journals for peer review either, you should be championing them too.

[cyberjill]

Big D wrote:

I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science
anything that has not done that, isn’t science, but is propaganda
You are being played the fool

my gosh u are rude and full of itself, science is debatable, I had a teacher like that dumb as hell

[cyberjill]

Big D wrote:

I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science
anything that has not done that, isn’t science, but is propaganda
You are being played the fool

but you are the fool......fool!

[Big D]

cyberjill wrote:

<quoted text>my gosh u are rude and full of itself, science is debatable, I had a teacher like that dumb as hell

You think I am rude, try publishing one of his theories for peer review, you would be laughed out of the academies.

They expect real science, not politically motivated garbage

[Pattie4s]

These out of towners post "rick perry" frapp anyway.

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You think I am rude, try publishing one of his theories for peer review, you would be laughed out of the academies.
They expect real science, not politically motivated garbage

Did they laugh Henrik Svensmark,a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen out of the academics? Maybe they would in this country where they are paid to get certain results.

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

I am not going to discuss anything that has not been published specifically for peer review across the multiple disciplines of science
anything that has not done that, isn’t science, but is propaganda
You are being played the fool

In other words if we don't agree with your fake government paid models and theories that the sky is falling, it's propaganda....YOu are nuts, go away, stay on the gay thread.

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>

They expect real science, not politically motivated garbage

That's all you have, Global warming...climate is changing...it's cold, no it's hot....is all from politics to obtain more money, they even changed it to climate change idiot. Follow the money fool.

[Pod People]

Must be another rain storm of idiot "out of towners posters."

Must need more sugar so they can melt.

[Big D]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>That's all you have, Global warming...climate is changing...it's cold, no it's hot....is all from politics to obtain more money, they even changed it to climate change idiot. Follow the money fool.

Dummy there is a reason your pseudoscience has never ever been published in the science journals for peer review.

It would be ripped to shreds by actual science.

[cyberjill]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
You think I am rude, try publishing one of his theories for peer review, you would be laughed out of the academies.
They expect real science, not politically motivated garbage

I think you are very stupid. And a big loser.

[Pod People]

Hello jokers from "out of towners" who post worthless trash on htis site.

You still stink.

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
Dummy there is a reason your pseudoscience has never ever been published in the science journals for peer review.
It would be ripped to shreds by actual science.

Did they laugh Henrik Svensmark,a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen out of the academics? Maybe they would in this country where they are paid to get certain results.

[RiccardoFire]

cyberjill wrote:

<quoted text>I think you are very stupid. And a big loser.

I agree jill, he's a sorry and sick old man that thinks he has it all figured out.

[Big D]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Did they laugh Henrik Svensmark,a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen out of the academics? Maybe they would in this country where they are paid to get certain results.

why is none of your pseudoscience published in the journals for peer review?

that question is for you educations, I know the answer

[Big D]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>Did they laugh Henrik Svensmark,a physicist and professor in the Division of Solar System Physics at the Danish National Space Institute in Copenhagen out of the academics? Maybe they would in this country where they are paid to get certain results.

I looked him up, the answer is yes, there was tremendous and overwhelming criticism of his work

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
why is none of your pseudoscience published in the journals for peer review?
that question is for you educations, I know the answer

Get some help, you sound insane. The studies are wildly published and open, unlike the Gore studies. This is your religion isn't it? I just figured it out...lol....get some help.

[RiccardoFire]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
I looked him up, the answer is yes, there was tremendous and overwhelming criticism of his work

is that what wikipedia said? lol..of course he was, do you think he is the only one that debunks the sky is falling? They become targets by the alarmists.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...

since you like wikipedia, here are more that say it's fraud.

[Big D]

RiccardoFire wrote:

<quoted text>is that what wikipedia said? lol..of course he was, do you think he is the only one that debunks the sky is falling? They become targets by the alarmists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
since you like wikipedia, here are more that say it's fraud.

I also notice he has never ever published his theory for peer review in the scientific journals

I suppose you can imagine why

besides there is more money to be made telling people what they want to think, instead of what is real