Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments
187,121 - 187,140 of 200,570 Comments Last updated 44 min ago
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216166
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Doubt it. Given you slit your own throat in here with your idiotic posts you nor those on the side of gay marriage would want them pulled off.
That's rich coming from you.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216167
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
A YouTube video?????
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!
OMG....HOW could we argue with THAT?!
You are so stupid you think if it's a YouTube video, it's a joke.

Obama's speeches are on YouTube videos. Harvey Milk's too. How could we argue with THAT?!
DrRuth

Chico, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216169
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a liar and you know it. HPV can be spread even in the confines of marriage. Most people do not come to a marriage as virgins. They have had intercourse at some point in their lives. If a man who has had multiple partners marries a woman who is a virgin, he can transmit HPV to her, putting her at risk of genital warts, multiple infections, and cancer.
Unless you are prepared to outlaw premarital intercourse, then you are not going to be able to eliminate the risk of vaginal intercourse.
And if you did outlaw premarital intercourse, then anal sex would be even less risky. There would be practically no risk at all.
"In the End" you paint yourself into a corner every time.
"Unless you are prepared to outlaw premarital intercourse, then you are not going to be able to eliminate the risk of vaginal intercourse."
What ?

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216170
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

DrOzz wrote:
Go away riccddoo's.
YOU go away, most of us don't want WW3!!

Just today we find out that Obama has NO PROOF that Assad used chemical weapons, most likely it was the rebels he's supporting that set it up for a photo opt blame game.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216172
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dumbfuck,
I think it's up to the individual if they want to put themselves at risk no matter what the venture.
Not you or your monkey crew.
Just an FYI. Mind your own business loser given I have no doubt it needs more attention than your sorry ass looking over the fence and deciding how your neighbor should live his or her life.
Thank you for siding with me that it comes with more risk. The point was never "up to the individual", I could care less if they want to ride the rear all day, the point is lying about the safety of it. I see why they want ObamaCare. Are you still a big fan of the great obama? Did you have fun messing with suzanne/debsueallen?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216173
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
No...
Drug use puts other people at risk. If someone high on cocaine decides to act ignorant and hurt someone else while under the influence, then the user has taken the victim's choice away. The victim was not a consensual partner in the injury.
Marajuana?
Prostitution is fine by me as long as it is regulated so that it doesn't involve people who are forced into the business against their will or underage people.
Plus generate tax revenue. Regulation is the key in that regard.
The key components in any "risky" situation must be consent by adults that do not put other uninvolved people at risk.
It's fair to say, even the "do what one wants with one's body" has limits.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216174
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>YOU go away, most of us don't want WW3!!
Just today we find out that Obama has NO PROOF that Assad used chemical weapons, most likely it was the rebels he's supporting that set it up for a photo opt blame game.
What a mess Obama has made of the middle east. And foreign policy.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216175
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

8

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
"Redefining marriage".
Isn't that what they called it once a white man was finally able to legally marry a black woman or visa versa back in the day???
You just got BUSTED fool.
LOL!!!
The issue was not whether a mixed race couple's relationship constituted a marriage, but rather whether or not legally they should be able to marry. There is still a considerable consensus that does accept a same sex personal intimate sexual relationship constitutes "marriage".

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216177
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What a mess Obama has made of the middle east. And foreign policy.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216178
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

We should all keep supporting Obama no matter what:

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216179
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

President Obama needs your help starting World War III! Find out how you can help!
Anonymous

Vallejo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216181
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Pennsylvania judge orders end to gay marriage licenses
http://www.sfgate.com/news/us/article/Pa-judg...

hahahahahahahaha

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216183
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny, I've never heard of a "prolapsed vagina"...
Ever hear of a prolapsed uterus, you titmouse? It can be caused by having too many babies.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216184
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

DrRuth wrote:
<quoted text>
"Unless you are prepared to outlaw premarital intercourse, then you are not going to be able to eliminate the risk of vaginal intercourse."
What ?
Unless you outlaw all premarital intercourse between men and women, then you will not be able to eliminate the risks of STDS and other injuries that can occur through penile/vaginal intercourse.

Is it clear now?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216185
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Anonymous wrote:
Pennsylvania judge orders end to gay marriage licenses
http://www.sfgate.com/news/us/article/Pa-judg...
hahahahahahahaha
You know, that's kind of how things started in California. Then mayor, Gavin Newsom, took it upon himself to begin issuing marriage license from San Francisco's City Hall.

In the end look what happened... California is a state in which same-sex couples can legally be married.

It'll be interesting to see where this goes in Pennsylvania.

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216186
Sep 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Though it looks that people do not like to allow this, but still we should think that one person cannot stop from doing anything in his personal life and we should let them leave freely as far as they are not harming others.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216187
Sep 13, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Who says a gay couple has to?
LOL!!!
And their "mix-n-match" will amount to a previously abandoned or abused child to have a stable home should a gay couple adopt.
Brother - that's a positive.
The fact you and KiKrazy don't like it is your problem. Added to your angst will be the fact you can't stop them from either marrying or adopting. You're impotent little man.
~Why would anyone even think a ss couple 'has' to???

They CAN'T!!! Period!!!

~In your 'mix and match', two false statements;

1. You neglected to mention orphaned kids. Why just the negative?

2. According to the latest, largest and most scientific study to date, lesbian couples rated the WORST default parents, AFTER single parents, of six default family types! Gay couples did not even rate.

~There is nothing you can do or say that prevents the fact that ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage, and they will ALWAYS deprive a child of one gender parent and at least one natural parent. A fake half marriage and half parents at the price of a child.

Sad and sick.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216188
Sep 13, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
'Travesty','disaster','sinful' ...you can call marriages in which the members involved happen to be of the same sex anything you want.
You can come in here and give me the news just by seeing a gay couple kiss on TV made you projectile vomit your Cheerios and almond milk breakfast six and a half yards from it's point of origin because you had it measured.
You can tell me you just had a sťance in which you were able to speak with Jesus Christ himself with the help of a Ouija board last night in which he voiced his disapproval of same sex marriages.
It all amounts to nothing more than your biased opinion and has absofukkinlutely no muscle in it to stop gays from getting married in the future.
LOL!!!
Naw, I'm not telling you those things.

Ss marriage is an oxymoron.

Here's why.

Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior. Literally 'unmarriage'!

There is absolutely nothing you can do or say to change those facts.

The only thing you are doing is showing your stupidity by supporting a farce.

SMile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216189
Sep 13, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
"Classic morality"?!? By whose standards? Western standards? Contemporary standards? Christian standards?
Do I need to remind you of the many countries that even today practice polygamy? What about the cultures that turn a blind eye to mistresses? Seems like history is replete with men who held concubines.
You conveniently forget about those cultural practices that aren't a part of your own personal, ideal worldview.
There is no "classic morality", you boob.
You keep forgetting that YOU don't get to impose YOUR notions of morality onto anyone else. This would be an example of a classic narcissistic characteristic.
Learn the difference between classic morality and classic immorality.

I'm 'imposing' nothing, just pointing out reality.

Idiot.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216190
Sep 13, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither can a sterile heterosexual couple.
Please...remove the Hush Puppy shoe from your mouth and learn to think before sounding your horn next time sister. It just looks stupid.
The accidental failure of one point among countless EQUATES a sterile couple to ss couples who can never ever 100% of the time mutually procreate???

Thanks for exposing how weak your position is!

DAmn son, you brain is stuck on stupid.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Re-Elect Tom Fuhrman Menifee City Council 33 min Quail Valley Resi... 8
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 4 hr air mail 7,924
Mann Has a Plan -- Not Only for Menifee, but th... 18 hr teacher951 1
Sun City: NAACP denied meeting spot (Oct '12) 18 hr teacher951 7
Many Sonic Booms or Earthquakes Felt in Menifee? (Jan '10) Tue TawshaRose 27
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Tue matches lighters 15,961
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Aug 24 Mono 4,996
•••

Menifee News Video

•••
•••

Menifee Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Menifee People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Menifee News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Menifee
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••