Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201891 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215886 Sep 11, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever been to Ohio?
LOL!!!
I lived there for over a year once on a transfer. Gray skies all year. From October 1st to May 29th you don't see the sun. The wet snow which comes down about every f-ing day in winter stays on the ground and accumulates until spring when the mounds which are pushed to the side by snowplows and shoves which have longed turned black due to the accumulation of soot finally melt. You freeze your ass off during this time not only due to the freaking absolutely bone chilling temperatures but also to the added benefit of the humidity which brings that cold clear through you no matter how many clothes, jackets and longjohns you manage to get on in the morning. Hit the road to icy streets covered in more salt than the Dead Sea which leaves your new car a rustbucket within 2 years.
Summer isn't much better. Humidity so thick and combined with the heat there's no use in taking a shower given you'll be covered in sweat the minute you put your first foot out of bed. Might as well lather yourself with Ivory soap then only to have the perspiration that follows rinse it off then repeat given you won't stop sweating until midnight that night. More bugs than a Malaysian rain forest as well and rain that leaves the place a muggy mess making sure your electricity bill tops $427 each month given you hopefully have an air conditioner.
Gotta love the inhabitants as well. Pasty fat white people whom all could easily pass as examples of the worst patrons WalMart could offer the world. Exotic to these people is taking a day to go to the annual fair only to down even more fried food which got them to be thunder clapping creations in the first place.
Trust me sunshine...been there...seen that. No jealousy here for someone throwing insults to me from 'Wooster, Ohio'...LOL!!!!!
Yes and it's better than Sacramento. And it's dopey ad hominem to say someone is wrong because Ohio sucks. But that's why I like you silly jackasses!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215888 Sep 11, 2013
Ithappens wrote:
<quoted text>Should have could have might have. The fact remains as this procreation is not a requirement of marriage. IF a married couple does not have children they do not qualify for extra deductions or benefits reguardless of thier sexual make up. Keep your Jesus off their balls!
Keep your tiny little girly-man balls off Jesus. And you'll be fine.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215889 Sep 11, 2013
Gustavo wrote:
What ever happened to that big fat "Farm Boi" ? lol
He had a sudden attack of stupid and joined the Marine Corps. He's at the Island getting his head fitted for the jar.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215891 Sep 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Damn boy, don't you read/watch the news???
Get off your lazy ass and look it up you fat slob. I'll bet your ride those carts at Walmart, and make you wife waddle behind you!
High Five!

And the Sacramento Walmart at that. Very classy.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#215892 Sep 11, 2013
Ithappens wrote:
<quoted text>Should have could have might have. The fact remains as this procreation is not a requirement of marriage. IF a married couple does not have children they do not qualify for extra deductions or benefits reguardless of thier sexual make up. Keep your Jesus off their balls!
It doesn't need to b a requirement for it to be the basis upon which the state recognizes marriage. Hence the following:

From U.S. law.

“[T]he first purpose of matrimony, by the laws of nature and society, is procreation.” Baker v. Baker, 13 Cal. 87, 103 (1859).“he procreation of children under the shield and sanction of the law” is one of the “two principal ends of marriage.” Sharon v. Sharon, 75 Cal. 1 (1888)(quoting Stewart on Marriage and Divorce, sec. 103.“Procreation, if not the sole, is at least an important, reason for the existence of the marriage relation.” Davis v. Davis, 106 A. 644, 645 (N.J. Ch. Div. 1919).“The great end of matrimony is ... the procreation of a progeny having a legal title to maintenance by the father.” Laudo v. Laudo, 197 N.Y.S. 396, 397 (App. Div. 1919); Poe v. Gerstein, 517 F.2d 787, 796 (5th Cir. 1975)(“[P]rocreation of offspring could be considered one of the major purposes of marriage....”); Singer v. Hara, 522 P.2d 1187, 1195 (Wash. App. 1974)(“[M]arriage exists as a protected legal institution primarily because of societal values associated with the propagation of the human race.”); Baker v. Nelson, 191 N.W.2d 185, 186 (Minn. 1971), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)(“The institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.”); Heup v. Heup, 172 N.W.2d 334, 336 (Wis. 1969)(“Having children is a primary purpose of marriage.”); Zoglio v. Zoglio, 157 A.2d 627, 628 (D.C. App. 1960)(“One of the primary purposes of matrimony is procreation.”); Frost v. Frost, 181 N.Y.S.2d 562, 563 (Supr. Ct. New York Co. 1958)(discussing “one of the primary purposes of marriage, to wit, the procreation of the human species.”); Ramon v. Ramon, 34 N.Y.S. 2d 100, 108 (Fam. Ct. Div. Richmond Co. 1942)(“The procreation of off-spring under the natural law being the object of marriage, its permanency is the foundation of the social order.”); Stegienko v. Stegienko, 295 N.W. 252, 254 (Mich. 1940)(stating that “procreation of children is one of the important ends of matrimony”); Gard v. Gard, 169 N.W. 908, 912 (Mich. 1918)(“It has been said in many of the cases cited that one of the great purposes of marriage is procreation.”); Lyon v. Barney, 132 Ill. App. 45, 50 (1907)(“[T]he procreating of the human species is regarded, at least theoretically, as the primary purpose of marriage ...”); Grover v. Zook, 87 P.638, 639 (Wash. 1906)(“One of the most important functions of wedlock is the procreation of children.”); Adams v. Howerton, 486 F. Supp. 1119, 1124 (C.D. Cal. 1980), aff’d 673 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir. 1982)(observing that a “state has a compelling interest in encouraging and fostering procreation of the race”);
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215893 Sep 11, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Sticking an O'Cedar broom handle 4 inches up your ass might give you a smile on your face...
LOL!!!
You sound like a man of experience.

LOL!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215894 Sep 11, 2013
Ithappens wrote:
<quoted text>Do you smile when you watch Kiddie Porn?
You sound like a man who does. Hope you get caught soon.
Huh

Faribault, MN

#215895 Sep 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. I support marriage equality for all.
I attack you because you are a loudmouthed jackass. And a bigot.
You must have been horrible in military.,...Bet you shot as many of our guys as there's. I state facts...yes I say them loud and make sure the bigots get that.

I AM NOT A BIGOT AT ALL...Prove I am....
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215896 Sep 11, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF????????
Hitting the Schmirnoff a little early are we??????????
ROFL!!!!!
Who is "we" do you have a mouse in your pocket?
Huh

Faribault, MN

#215897 Sep 11, 2013
Old Grand Dad wrote:
<quoted text>
You got it by forcing it down our throats, you had to beg, sue and force. You shouldn't feel that America agrees with it.
You don't have to agree with it.. I mean I hate your KKK group. But you have right to your vile evil demonic hate. JUST KEEP IT OUT OF LAW AND BANS AND RULES..
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215898 Sep 11, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Astrolube.
No shit. The stuff exists.
You sound like a man who would know. We'll defer to your expertise on sexual lubricants.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215899 Sep 11, 2013
Ithappens wrote:
<quoted text>"
.... wow seems like heterosexual men have a problem keeping Jonny Long Dong in thier pants.
You would know. We'll defer to your expertise on that too.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215901 Sep 11, 2013
commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>It takes 4 to make a daisy chain.
If a two man marriage is good a three or four man marriage is even better, but these hypocrites seem lukewarm on that. I mean tepid. I run it up the flagpole and they don't salute it. They mumble something and get mad.

YUK!YUK!YUK! Ah good times.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215902 Sep 11, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Really.
You seem to know a lot about those you've never met and claim to be a lot of things from the pulpit of the anonymous internet.
I myself don't give you much in terms of character but there you go bullshitter.
I met you before. You wanted to beat me into a greasy stain remember punk?

We do.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215903 Sep 11, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then move there you pillar of false valor.
LOL!!!
I said it's better than where you live. I didn't say it's better than where I live, on a boat on beautiful San Francisco Bay. It doesn't get much better than where I live. I also live in Brooklyn, my home town. Ah good times!

LOL!!!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215904 Sep 11, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
You must have been horrible in military.,...Bet you shot as many of our guys as there's. I state facts...yes I say them loud and make sure the bigots get that.
I AM NOT A BIGOT AT ALL...Prove I am....
No need for me to prove you are a bigot, you're doing quite well on your own.
Huh

Faribault, MN

#215906 Sep 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
No need for me to prove you are a bigot, you're doing quite well on your own.
You cant and wont because I am not....RIGHT LIAR???????

When you played sports did you trip your own team mates?

We are on same side don't attack me attack the enemy IDIOT.
Ithappens

Rock Island, IL

#215907 Sep 11, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
It doesn't need to b a requirement for it to be the basis upon which the state recognizes marriage. Hence the following:
From U.S. law.
“[T]he first purpose of matrimony, by the laws of nature and society, is procreation.” Baker v. Baker, 13 Cal. 87, 103 (1859).“he procreation of children under the shield and sanction of the law” is one of the “two principal ends of marriage.” Sharon v. Sharon, 75 Cal. 1 (1888)(quoting Stewart on Marriage and Divorce, sec. 103.“Procreation, if not the sole, is at least an important, reason for the existence of the marriage relation.” Davis v. Davis, 106 A. 644, 645 (N.J. Ch. Div. 1919).“The great end of matrimony is ... the procreation of a progeny having a legal title to maintenance by the father.” Laudo v. Laudo, 197 N.Y.S. 396, 397 (App. Div. 1919); Poe v. Gerstein, 517 F.2d 787, 796 (5th Cir. 1975)(“[P]rocreation of offspring could be considered one of the major purposes of marriage....”); Singer v. Hara, 522 P.2d 1187, 1195 (Wash. App. 1974)(“[M]arriage exists as a protected legal institution primarily because of societal values associated with the propagation of the human race.”); Baker v. Nelson, 191 N.W.2d 185, 186 (Minn. 1971), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)(“The institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.”); Heup v. Heup, 172 N.W.2d 334, 336 (Wis. 1969)(“Having children is a primary purpose of marriage.”); Zoglio v. Zoglio, 157 A.2d 627, 628 (D.C. App. 1960)(“One of the primary purposes of matrimony is procreation.”); Frost v. Frost, 181 N.Y.S.2d 562, 563 (Supr. Ct. New York Co. 1958)(discussing “one of the primary purposes of marriage, to wit, the procreation of the human species.”); Ramon v. Ramon, 34 N.Y.S. 2d 100, 108 (Fam. Ct. Div. Richmond Co. 1942)(“The procreation of off-spring under the natural law being the object of marriage, its permanency is the foundation of the social order.”); Stegienko v. Stegienko, 295 N.W. 252, 254 (Mich. 1940)(stating that “procreation of children is one of the important ends of matrimony”); Gard v. Gard, 169 N.W. 908, 912 (Mich. 1918)(“It has been said in many of the cases cited that one of the great purposes of marriage is procreation.”); Lyon v. Barney, 132 Ill. App. 45, 50 (1907)(“[T]he procreating of the human species is regarded, at least theoretically, as the primary purpose of marriage ...”); Grover v. Zook, 87 P.638, 639 (Wash. 1906)(“One of the most important functions of wedlock is the procreation of children.”); Adams v. Howerton, 486 F. Supp. 1119, 1124 (C.D. Cal. 1980), aff’d 673 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir. 1982)(observing that a “state has a compelling interest in encouraging and fostering procreation of the race”);
SCOTUS, 2013, Same sex marriage is equal, now get over it
Ithappens

Rock Island, IL

#215909 Sep 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You would know. We'll defer to your expertise on that too.
Good hearing, I rattle my zipper and here you are. Open wide.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#215910 Sep 11, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You sound like a man who does. Hope you get caught soon.
Prove I am pipsqueak.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Computerized Accounting & Tax - Cathy B... (Jul '09) 22 hr Carmen Diaz 12
Scammed by Richardson RV; DO NOT do business w... (Feb '15) Sat C MURPHY 6
Review: Final Strike Martial Arts (Jul '16) Fri CyndiH 43
the music thread (Apr '12) Feb 17 Musikologist 35
Katy Myers is located at 32619 Caden Ct. Winche... Feb 16 Dave 2
Applebees is located at 1758 N. Perris Blvd. Pe... (Mar '12) Feb 14 Maria Ramirez 3
Poll Should Sun City Gardens Be Closed Down? (Jun '08) Feb 13 Mary14 29

Menifee Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Menifee Mortgages