Quite a few people actually otherwise this debate wouldn't be necessary. Also, men and women make babies, the orientation is irrelevant in that.<quoted text>
Who gives a damn that straight people can make children?
Hellloooooooo.....earth to Big Red.....marriage laws are based on the union of husband and wife, including their sexual union. Although not a "requirement", as somehow now it would need to be in order to rationalize SSM, husbands and wives are expected to consummate their marriage if desired and physically capable, and engage in "marital relations". It matters because its crucial as to how marriage is defined. SSMers have to dismiss it, or marginalize it in order to promote their cause.Procreation promises are not a requirement for marriage between heterosexual couples. Why do you keep bringing up this issue as though it matters?
Single people can adopt children, adult siblings can adopt children......your point?Furthermore, as has been pointed out to you numerous times, gay couples can and do adopt children. Consider that before you get on here again and try to point out the childlessness of gay couples.
No doubt it's here. As to it's spread, who knows, maybe the Supreme Court unwittingly galvanized SSM opponents to redouble their efforts.Nothing that you can say here or anywhere will make a difference in the fact that same-sex marriage is here and is spreading throughout the country.
That could be after polygamy is legal, and the state decides to get out of the marriage business all together. If the state no longer recognizes marriage, is it still a right?I can't wait for the day when people such as yourself will be forced to sit down and STFU about this issue. It will happen. Hopefully you, a self-described near-senile, jack-ass, will hang on until that day.