Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201480 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Skizzos

San Dimas, CA

#194493 Jun 4, 2013
F Skizzo's has scored again or did they?

YUK!YUK!YUK! That was funny if I do say so myself.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#194494 Jun 4, 2013
big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I donít care
I would vote for poly if it came up, but it wont.
It does not have the public backing, and the supporters of it donít have the interest to put it in serious play
Right now it is just a joke, that may not always be the case, but right now, you have to piggy back onto Same sex marriage because you donít have the kahunas to actually push for it on its own merits alone.
As long as you present it as a joke, a joke is all it will be.
Is is no joke to the good people being denied equal rights or even worse, the possibility of going to prison for years.
Mahmoud Abdullah

Sacramento, CA

#194495 Jun 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Is is no joke to the good people being denied equal rights or even worse, the possibility of going to prison for years.
Holy shi+ look this guy 24/7 he thinking about gay marrij. Wake up 5 am; gay marrij, go to bathroom; gay marrij, smoke a bowl sum speshul stuff; gay marrij, go get sum more stuff; gay marrij, gay marrij, gay marrij, go to bathroom; gay marrij, order cheap male hooker with welfare muney; gay marrij, get hungry so smoke more speshil stuff now not hungry; gay marrij.....continue for 12 day until muney and stuff run out then go rob same male hooker so can smoke and post about gay marrij. He post more about gay marrij than any gay person combined HAHAHAHAHA

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#194496 Jun 4, 2013
http://m.sltrib.com/sltrib/mobile3/56282277-2...

While the Supreme Court ponders the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, activists along the political spectrum are voicing their opinions on monogamy's core institution and whom it should include. Most miss the following point: DOMA doesn't just prohibit gay marriage by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also prohibits plural marriage by limiting it to one and one.

The plural marriage movement is real. An estimated 50,000 to 150,000 polygamous families already live in America, from the well-publicized Muslims and Mormons to the African and Vietnamese immigrants keeping up their cultural ways. From modern feminists looking for a better work/life balance, to family traditionalists, who maintain that any marriage is better than none in the fight against the rising tide of single parents, cohabitation, and divorce.

Over 500,000 others identify as polyamorous, and engage in "ethical non-monogamy" ó loving, committed, concurrent, consensual relationships with multiple partners.

The push for non-monogamous marriage reveals some unexpected bedfellows: Everyone from former presidents to the remarried elderly couple next door. Experts say that 30 to 60 percent of married people in the U.S. will commit adultery over the course of their 'exclusive, dyadic relationships,' producing a form of de facto polygamy. Thousands of others will actually marry a second, sometimes even a third person, albeit after a legal divorce from their original spouse.

The rise of no-fault divorce has made "polygamy on the installment plan" more and more common for adults of all ages. Whether it's de facto polygamy in the form of adultery, or serial polygamy with no-fault divorce, we as Americans have already broken the sanctity of the "couple."

While some believe that plural marriage could lead to harm against women, regulation would protect them. And what about egalitarian polygamy, based on adult consent? Is it inherently abusive? Or more abusive than many "traditional" marriages based on patriarchal domination?
Youre a loser bro

Sacramento, CA

#194497 Jun 4, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
http://m.sltrib.com/sltrib/mob ile3/56282277-219/marriage-plu ral-polygamy-court.html.csp
While the Supreme Court ponders the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, activists along the political spectrum are voicing their opinions on monogamy's core institution and whom it should include. Most miss the following point: DOMA doesn't just prohibit gay marriage by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also prohibits plural marriage by limiting it to one and one.
The plural marriage movement is real. An estimated 50,000 to 150,000 polygamous families already live in America, from the well-publicized Muslims and Mormons to the African and Vietnamese immigrants keeping up their cultural ways. From modern feminists looking for a better work/life balance, to family traditionalists, who maintain that any marriage is better than none in the fight against the rising tide of single parents, cohabitation, and divorce.
Over 500,000 others identify as polyamorous, and engage in "ethical non-monogamy" ó loving, committed, concurrent, consensual relationships with multiple partners.
The push for non-monogamous marriage reveals some unexpected bedfellows: Everyone from former presidents to the remarried elderly couple next door. Experts say that 30 to 60 percent of married people in the U.S. will commit adultery over the course of their 'exclusive, dyadic relationships,' producing a form of de facto polygamy. Thousands of others will actually marry a second, sometimes even a third person, albeit after a legal divorce from their original spouse.
The rise of no-fault divorce has made "polygamy on the installment plan" more and more common for adults of all ages. Whether it's de facto polygamy in the form of adultery, or serial polygamy with no-fault divorce, we as Americans have already broken the sanctity of the "couple."
While some believe that plural marriage could lead to harm against women, regulation would protect them. And what about egalitarian polygamy, based on adult consent? Is it inherently abusive? Or more abusive than many "traditional" marriages based on patriarchal domination?
U need to get a life bro...u think anyone's actually gunna read that?? U rizzo and ki-mare should form your own suicide prevention club
big D

Modesto, CA

#194498 Jun 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Is is no joke to the good people being denied equal rights or even worse, the possibility of going to prison for years.
as long as your support structure is so poor that you have to piggy back on Same Sex marriage forums to get anywhere it is a joke and will remain a joke

You personally are part of the reason it is a joke
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#194499 Jun 4, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
http://m.sltrib.com/sltrib/mob ile3/56282277-219/marriage-plu ral-polygamy-court.html.csp
While the Supreme Court ponders the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, activists along the political spectrum are voicing their opinions on monogamy's core institution and whom it should include. Most miss the following point: DOMA doesn't just prohibit gay marriage by defining marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It also prohibits plural marriage by limiting it to one and one.
The plural marriage movement is real. An estimated 50,000 to 150,000 polygamous families already live in America, from the well-publicized Muslims and Mormons to the African and Vietnamese immigrants keeping up their cultural ways. From modern feminists looking for a better work/life balance, to family traditionalists, who maintain that any marriage is better than none in the fight against the rising tide of single parents, cohabitation, and divorce.
Over 500,000 others identify as polyamorous, and engage in "ethical non-monogamy" ó loving, committed, concurrent, consensual relationships with multiple partners.
The push for non-monogamous marriage reveals some unexpected bedfellows: Everyone from former presidents to the remarried elderly couple next door. Experts say that 30 to 60 percent of married people in the U.S. will commit adultery over the course of their 'exclusive, dyadic relationships,' producing a form of de facto polygamy. Thousands of others will actually marry a second, sometimes even a third person, albeit after a legal divorce from their original spouse.
The rise of no-fault divorce has made "polygamy on the installment plan" more and more common for adults of all ages. Whether it's de facto polygamy in the form of adultery, or serial polygamy with no-fault divorce, we as Americans have already broken the sanctity of the "couple."
While some believe that plural marriage could lead to harm against women, regulation would protect them. And what about egalitarian polygamy, based on adult consent? Is it inherently abusive? Or more abusive than many "traditional" marriages based on patriarchal domination?
Brilliant post.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#194501 Jun 4, 2013
big D wrote:
<quoted text>
as long as your support structure is so poor that you have to piggy back on Same Sex marriage forums to get anywhere it is a joke and will remain a joke
You personally are part of the reason it is a joke
How dare you call someone's life, beliefs and possibility of happiness a joke.

If someone called the struggle for same sex marriage a joke you'd scream bloody murder.

Give it up loser. You are a hypocrite. Just come right out and say you are a bigot and end your squirmy bullsh!t.
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#194502 Jun 4, 2013
Has anyone else wondered why - with the eyes of politically correct Government operatives' focusing on sexual assaults in the military - why they are strangely silent about the fact that the vast majority of those assaults are made by our Homosexual friends - and the lesbians - against decent non-Homosexual and non-lesbian military personnel?

Ronald
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#194503 Jun 4, 2013
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#194504 Jun 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I often am posting from NY you third rate dope. I live CA/NY about 70%/30%. I hurry over the great flyover part of the USA where you backward hicks live. I don't stop. I saw Deliverance!
I saw you in Deliverance funny you should mention it you finochio
U Too R a loser

Schenectady, NY

#194505 Jun 4, 2013
Youre a loser bro wrote:
<quoted text>
U need to get a life bro...u think anyone's actually gunna read that?? U rizzo and ki-mare should form your own suicide prevention club
Right back at ya "bro", or is it "sis"?
big D

Modesto, CA

#194506 Jun 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
How dare you call someone's life, beliefs and possibility of happiness a joke.
If someone called the struggle for same sex marriage a joke you'd scream bloody murder.
Give it up loser. You are a hypocrite. Just come right out and say you are a bigot and end your squirmy bullsh!t.
A joke, you donít create a polygamy forum because you know darn well you will be over there by yourself whining to yourself

So you have to piggy back on Same Sex marriage, how pathetic can you be?

We all know it and are laughing in your face.
big D

Modesto, CA

#194507 Jun 4, 2013
Ronald wrote:
Has anyone else wondered why - with the eyes of politically correct Government operatives' focusing on sexual assaults in the military - why they are strangely silent about the fact that the vast majority of those assaults are made by our Homosexual friends - and the lesbians - against decent non-Homosexual and non-lesbian military personnel?
Ronald
Because they arenít, the vast majority of them are heterosexual males assaulting women.

And everyone already knows it

Lying just makes it obvious how pathetic and desperate you are
Youre a loser bro

Sacramento, CA

#194508 Jun 4, 2013
U Too R a loser wrote:
<quoted text>
Right back at ya "bro", or is it "sis"?
Yes it's sis I'm a woman r u shocked?? Seems like I struck a nerve by mentioning Rizzo...hmmm LOL
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#194509 Jun 4, 2013
big D wrote:
<quoted text>
A joke, you donít create a polygamy forum because you know darn well you will be over there by yourself whining to yourself
So you have to piggy back on Same Sex marriage, how pathetic can you be?
We all know it and are laughing in your face.
ha ha "we" are laughing in Frankie's face. So funny.

You're a loser son. Bow out with what little dignity you have left.

Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. You are wrong. It is not a joke. You wish it was a joke, but it is not.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#194510 Jun 4, 2013
big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Lying just makes it obvious how pathetic and desperate you are
Indeed it does, Big D. Indeed it does.
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#194511 Jun 4, 2013
big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Because they arenít, the vast majority of them are heterosexual males assaulting women.
And everyone already knows it
Lying just makes it obvious how pathetic and desperate you are
big D.

Well, if you are right - and of course you are not - why is integrated Government so strangely silent about your claims that "the vast minority" of sexual assaults in the military are Homosexual and lesbian sexual assaults on young non-Homosexual and non-lesbian military personnel - often by integrated Government enabled superiors who exercise life and death powers over our brave young fighting people?

Ronald
big D

Modesto, CA

#194512 Jun 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
ha ha "we" are laughing in Frankie's face. So funny.
You're a loser son. Bow out with what little dignity you have left.
Polygamy deserves the same respect and consideration as same sex marriage. You are wrong. It is not a joke. You wish it was a joke, but it is not.
Let me explain to you what a loser is, a loser cant stand up with an issue on its own merits, he has to piggy back on a separate topic.

A loser gains nothing despite all their efforts ( or in you case lack of effort, like how many states now support polygamy vs the momentum of same sex marriage )

We all know who the loser is here Frankie, you are why it is a joke, because you cannot stand it on its own, you have to piggy back to get a ride.

In my opinion Polygamy will eventually become legal, despite losers like you trying to drag it down by piggy backing on other topics, and throwing it in the face of anyone that promotes same sex marriage.

It will eventually succeed, in spite of youÖ but not for some time, and if and when it does, it will be when the issue can stand on its own.
Ronald

Bellflower, CA

#194513 Jun 4, 2013
During the revolution, our Homosexual friends and the lesbians argued for the acceptance of open Homosexuality in our military. The reason, they said, was because our Homosexual friends and the lesbians who had enough self respect to keep their sexual practices "in the closet" *(so to speak)* might jeopardize national security because they feared being exposed by agents of "the enemy" if they refused to provide classified information to foreign powers.

After the revolution, the Government has instituted a system of open Homosexuality and lesbianism among our brave military personnel. The openly Homosexual Bradley Manning is currently on trial. According to documents provided by integrated Government sources, Manning - free from the danger of being "outed" - made more secret classified military information available to America's enemies than our decent Homosexual friends and lesbians who had enough self-respect to remain in the closet ever thought of doing.

Incidentally, this matter is neither here nor there with me. I am signing up with the K-9 corps.

Ronald

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Metrolink Train Ride from Perris-South to River... 4 hr TRAIN RIDE METROLINK 2
News Moreno Valley: Six arrested in connection with ... Thu Kenny 2
Menifee Authors (Feb '15) Jun 13 286author 5
Is Menifee Racist? Jun 13 StopHate5 19
News Cities will never win if they play by Californi... Jun 12 Solarman 1
The best adult hookup dating site Wildomar Jun 6 Luis Diego 1
News Some people are still debating the Southwest ar... Jun 3 c45author 1

Menifee Jobs

Personal Finance

Menifee Mortgages