Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,037)

Showing posts 160,721 - 160,740 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184093
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

5

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>So I guess you are not happy with a lot of other species that have not set up groups and cultures? Are you upset at some of the monkeys that didn't evolve? What species do you model yourself after?
Not at all, you are assuming a whole lot here

Other species have indeed set up groups according to their abilities, some quite complex.

Monkeys did evolve, have evolved, likely still evolving, you need to go back to school before talking about this.

We are not the pinnacle of evolution, simply where our branch has led us.

Sharks have not evolved for tens of millions of years, if you want to talk about a species that has not evolved recently you should mention them. They have had no pressure to do so, a near perfect machine for the niche they fill.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184094
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>“Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth - the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal. Fred Hoyle, the distinguished cosmologist, once said it was as if "a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics".
To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.
Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn't exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear's porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.”
Wrong

more and more scientists are actually going the other way, you would know this if you looked at actual factual websites instead of the websites that fill you with garbage that you want to believe.

again you do not have enough information to be able to discuss this, and you are taking away from the actual topic of this forum.

We are done

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184095
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, but a Christian would never kill an innocent person. If they did, they violate a fundamental principle of Christianity. A Christian woman killing her unborn child would be the worst of that truth.
You have made the assertion that many claim to be Christians and are not. I would suggest this is an example. Or do you disagree?
Moreover, I have never said homosexuals are mentally deformed. You lie. Again.
A true Christian will not murder an innocent child. For any reason.
Well, how about we put it this way... There are many "Christians" who claim to be pro-life, who are pro-capital punishment and pro-war.

And there are many people who claim to be Christian, who believe in abortion in instances of rape, incest, danger to the mother's life, and/or mental/physical defect of the fetus.

So, don't lie and say that "Christians" as a concerted group would NEVER abort a fetus they believe is going to become gay. Because we BOTH know that's not the case.

If we lived in a society where all of those people who claim to be Christians REFUSED to go to war, REFUSED to own guns, REFUSED to in any way support capital punishment, and REFUSED to abort their children; then MAYBE I would agree with you.

1.2 million abortions are performed in the U.S. annually. Many of those abortions are performed on church going, Christ believing women. They justify it for many reasons. Telling them that they're going to have a gay/transgender son or daughter will simply be another reason for them to justify it.

That's reality... And it's people like you--who claim that we are defective--that we are "sinners"--that we destroy the family, etc; people like YOU who give will be giving them the motivation to abort.

You don't get to bitch about the existence of homosexuality--wanting us to disappear from the planet--and not have blood on your hands.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184096
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are not an equal relationship, just like all other relationships, every single one of which is ideally birthed solely by marriage.
Just admit it, you have no logical answer, so you spew out ad homoan attacks.
Smile.
Show me in law where marriage MUST BE based on a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating.

Show me any jurisdiction in the country that refuses to allow marriage that is not based on a cross cultural constraint of evolutionary mating.

Waiting...
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184097
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, how about we put it this way... There are many "Christians" who claim to be pro-life, who are pro-capital punishment and pro-war.
And there are many people who claim to be Christian, who believe in abortion in instances of rape, incest, danger to the mother's life, and/or mental/physical defect of the fetus.
So, don't lie and say that "Christians" as a concerted group would NEVER abort a fetus they believe is going to become gay. Because we BOTH know that's not the case.
If we lived in a society where all of those people who claim to be Christians REFUSED to go to war, REFUSED to own guns, REFUSED to in any way support capital punishment, and REFUSED to abort their children; then MAYBE I would agree with you.
1.2 million abortions are performed in the U.S. annually. Many of those abortions are performed on church going, Christ believing women. They justify it for many reasons. Telling them that they're going to have a gay/transgender son or daughter will simply be another reason for them to justify it.
That's reality... And it's people like you--who claim that we are defective--that we are "sinners"--that we destroy the family, etc; people like YOU who give will be giving them the motivation to abort.
You don't get to bitch about the existence of homosexuality--wanting us to disappear from the planet--and not have blood on your hands.
I would add that there are thousands of Christian churches that support same sex marriage and want to preform them in their churches.... why are their religious rights being denied?

You are right, Christians are not one block that speak with one voice, that has not been the case ever, and particularly not since the ending of the dark ages.

Not to mention that they are NOT the only religon in this country.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184098
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I used to not... I have actually flipped on that issue a couple of times. So I respect your opinion, it isn’t mine, but I can certainly understand someone with the position you support.
I had to ask myself if I could kill someone before I entered the military, because if I could not, my superiors should certainly know that, I decided that I could.
Later after having a family, it stuck me that there are people out there that we as a society are better off without.
Although I support the death penalty, I am certainly opposed to states that have used it too easily and often, and I am not all that upset that it is not currently used in my state.
Yours is an opinion that I can respect on that subject
I too have flipped. But since they don't carry out the death sentence and we spend millions housing them in a certain way and with all the appeals. It's a waste of money, make them suffer behind bars. I'd be for it if it was a faster process for those with no doubt of guilt.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184099
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong
more and more scientists are actually going the other way, you would know this if you looked at actual factual websites instead of the websites that fill you with garbage that you want to believe.
again you do not have enough information to be able to discuss this, and you are taking away from the actual topic of this forum.
We are done
Wrong

more and more scientists are actually going more towards a higher power, you would know this if you looked at actual factual websites instead of the websites that fill you with garbage that you want to believe, like the Government sites and Government sponsored studies.

again you do not have enough information to be able to discuss this, and the subject of gay marriage: what more needs to be said? we are done!
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184100
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
Big D.
Yes. Most of our founding fathers were prolific writers and speakers. It is a weak argument to pull up out of context quotes they may have made without reference to their overall political and religious philosophy.
Ronald
in the same token, you could say the same thing about biblical passages.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184101
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I do notice that baby changing stations do exist in men’s bathrooms now :)
Yes they do....babies can't change themselves.
It is fine to notice a difference, but justice wears a blindfold, blind to Race, creed, color, sex, religion, orientation, or national origin.
Religion? Even fundamentalist Mormons? Muslims..... hmmmmm...what do they have in common....what practice....
A goal we have not actually achieved, but always strive for.
Shoot for the moon.
You are on the wrong side of history
Perhaps..... or perhaps those who oppose redefing legal marriage will be vindicated by history. Opponent s of "no fault divorce" are one such example. Sounded great in theory, not in reality. We are paying the price today. Certain institutions are tampered with at our own peril
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184102
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I too have flipped. But since they don't carry out the death sentence and we spend millions housing them in a certain way and with all the appeals. It's a waste of money, make them suffer behind bars. I'd be for it if it was a faster process for those with no doubt of guilt.
Yeah, in a perfect world we would know innocence or guilt, and carry out the punishment without all the fuss and expense.

I suppose it boils down to, would I go for a headshot if you attacked my wife or children or grandchildren... the answer is.. yes I would, and not feel a moment of guilt over it.

You aren’t wrong there, which is why I won’t argue your stance, it is a logical and understandable one.

But there are a few that I would gladly flip the switch on myself. And I think we have tied the hands of justice a lot already.

If it came to a vote today, on re-legalizing the death penalty... I would have to think about it before I voted, and I cannot tell you now which way I would vote, because I am not sure which way I would go.

I agree wiht the death penalty in principal, but not how it is currently practiced in most states.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184103
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

commonpeeps wrote:
<quoted text>Yup you're right, it should have read moral-less liberals. As in lacking morals.
oh, i see.

wanting to the principles of feeding the poor, offering homes to the homeless, clothing those in need are all principles of "moral-less" liberals.

and the "high-morals" of the republicans include not spending any money on those less fortunate or the healing the sick or even creating a second class citizen of the tax paying homosexuals.

gotcha, nutcase.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184105
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
oh, i see.
wanting to the principles of feeding the poor, offering homes to the homeless, clothing those in need are all principles of "moral-less" liberals.
and the "high-morals" of the republicans include not spending any money on those less fortunate or the healing the sick or even creating a second class citizen of the tax paying homosexuals.
gotcha, nutcase.
I don’t find their stance to be "moral" to single out people based on their orientation and deny specific rights.

I consider those "low morals" and certainly un-American, however as I suspect the republicans are currently changing their stance on this issue as quickly as they can ( they can see the political and historic wind blowing ) it will only be the fringe of their party complaining.

A dwindling minority

We have "right", and "moral" on our side, that is why I do not doubt the outcome.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184106
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I don’t find their stance to be "moral" to single out people based on their orientation and deny specific rights.
I consider those "low morals" and certainly un-American, however as I suspect the republicans are currently changing their stance on this issue as quickly as they can ( they can see the political and historic wind blowing ) it will only be the fringe of their party complaining.
A dwindling minority
We have "right", and "moral" on our side, that is why I do not doubt the outcome.
hence the quotation marks. LOL. i call those types of "christians" self-avowed because it's a little difficult for me to buy into the line of thinking that it's ok to be derisive of my fellow mankind or to think "christians" are better than any other type of human on the earth (athiest, muslim, etc) and are to be treated deferentially by the laws of this nation.

i get disgusted by these types of self avowed christians that paint an ugly face of christ for others to see and to be pushed away from that which all christians should feel, share and understand : God's grace.

i respect your choice in being an athiest. i do not desire to force my christian outlook or expectations upon you or anyone else via legislation.

i think this swing that we're seeing in numbers of christians that are falling away and the rise in polling of people that are for same sex marriage is a direct result of the verbiage of these self avowed christians - and how they treat non-christians. why would anyone want to join their 'club' if they treat people the way they do? i think, by and large, people aren't buying into the way christ is depicted and certainly aren't buying what the self avowed christians are selling.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184107
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

5

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes they do....babies can't change themselves.
<quoted text>
Religion? Even fundamentalist Mormons? Muslims..... hmmmmm...what do they have in common....what practice....
<quoted text>
Shoot for the moon.
<quoted text>
Perhaps..... or perhaps those who oppose redefing legal marriage will be vindicated by history. Opponent s of "no fault divorce" are one such example. Sounded great in theory, not in reality. We are paying the price today. Certain institutions are tampered with at our own peril
My point is, noticing a difference, and designing laws to grant rights on those differences are two very different things.

No fault divorce is a fact, "irreconcilable difference" is a nice catch- all that allows any individual a divorce if desired.

What price are we paying? I agree with no-fault divorce. But then marriage is a contract, a promise, and contracts are broken, as are some promises.

we are not talking form a religious perspective here, as there are many religions here, including none at all, but from a legal perspective.

Yes there are consequences to breaking a contract, who everyone that has been through a divorce knows very well.

But as a society we are better off for it, wives of men who abuse them are no longer without an avenue of escape, those who remain married do so because it is their desire to do so.

I personally think we are much better off than before.

But before you respond, realized that I don’t consider the number of divorces a problem, the goal is NOT to keep people married, but for people who are married stay that way because they have a good marriage. I do not think wedding rings should be forged into a ball and chain
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184108
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
hence the quotation marks. LOL. i call those types of "christians" self-avowed because it's a little difficult for me to buy into the line of thinking that it's ok to be derisive of my fellow mankind or to think "christians" are better than any other type of human on the earth (athiest, muslim, etc) and are to be treated deferentially by the laws of this nation.
i get disgusted by these types of self avowed christians that paint an ugly face of christ for others to see and to be pushed away from that which all christians should feel, share and understand : God's grace.
i respect your choice in being an athiest. i do not desire to force my christian outlook or expectations upon you or anyone else via legislation.
i think this swing that we're seeing in numbers of christians that are falling away and the rise in polling of people that are for same sex marriage is a direct result of the verbiage of these self avowed christians - and how they treat non-christians. why would anyone want to join their 'club' if they treat people the way they do? i think, by and large, people aren't buying into the way christ is depicted and certainly aren't buying what the self avowed christians are selling.
Oh I knew...I was agreeing with you, I am disgusted by them as well.

The republican party is shifting on the subject now, I suspect 50 years from now, most Christian churches will support it as well, it will take them longer. The biggest flaw I have is believing in people, and I happen to believe that they actually want to do the right thing, they are having difficulty seeing past the dogma beat into them to see what the right thing is.

Look back not all that long ago, and they were burning people at the stake depending on of they were one sect of Christianity or another, few ( any?) of the churches would support that today.( maybe that one in Westborough Kansas )

I may be naive, but I would rather think good of people.
heartandmind

Moline, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184109
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh I knew...I was agreeing with you, I am disgusted by them as well.
The republican party is shifting on the subject now, I suspect 50 years from now, most Christian churches will support it as well, it will take them longer. The biggest flaw I have is believing in people, and I happen to believe that they actually want to do the right thing, they are having difficulty seeing past the dogma beat into them to see what the right thing is.
Look back not all that long ago, and they were burning people at the stake depending on of they were one sect of Christianity or another, few ( any?) of the churches would support that today.( maybe that one in Westborough Kansas )
I may be naive, but I would rather think good of people.
it's hard, for me annyway, to keep those rose colored glasses on in reading through these threads. all that hate & disgust that's expressed. the only glimmering hope is when i read the polls that are conducted regularly that more and more people disagree with the ideology expressed in these threads.

it wasn't that long ago that we saw blacks villified for stepping up and demanding the right to vote or to equal treatment in schools and laws....or women back in the teens and 20s of the 20th century. now, we see our society stand almost in total unity (granted, there are pockets of idiocy) in regards to those rights. i remember hearing older relatives back in the 60s talk about in disgust about the rulings regarding segregated schools. those relatives were in their 60s and 70s back then and are all gone now. they've all died off - and we'll most likely see the same sequence in the same sex marriage issue.

“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184110
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Proposition 8 won at the polls; that proves same sex marriage is antidemocratic.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184111
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
it's hard, for me annyway, to keep those rose colored glasses on in reading through these threads. all that hate & disgust that's expressed. the only glimmering hope is when i read the polls that are conducted regularly that more and more people disagree with the ideology expressed in these threads.
it wasn't that long ago that we saw blacks villified for stepping up and demanding the right to vote or to equal treatment in schools and laws....or women back in the teens and 20s of the 20th century. now, we see our society stand almost in total unity (granted, there are pockets of idiocy) in regards to those rights. i remember hearing older relatives back in the 60s talk about in disgust about the rulings regarding segregated schools. those relatives were in their 60s and 70s back then and are all gone now. they've all died off - and we'll most likely see the same sequence in the same sex marriage issue.
I have to use epoxy to keep them on LOL

But I would hate to lose that, I really would, I want… desperately, to think better of people than what they show.

But look at history, you started with black people, it wasn’t 200 years before that one could be burned at the state for being a Protestant, or Catholic ( depending on where you were )

it goes back and back and back

But you could be right, we may have to wait for them to die off, my relatives were from the deep south, so you can imagine what I heard as a child, but the children of those same people, are supportive of equal rights for everyone, even same sex marrage.

What annoys me is the people that we are waiting to die off, are my age, that bothers me no end. It was my generation that was supposed to get past all this garbage, we failed, however when I look at my children ( now in their 30's and 40's ) and their friends, where we have failed we at least taught those values to the next generation, even if we could not live up to them ourselves.

I have kept young by keeping young people around me, and listening ( not waiting my turn to talk ) to what they are saying, and thinking about why they are saying that. Sometimes that takes some effort on my part… my opinions are pretty ingrained.

If you look at the polls,( by young I mean 35 and younger ) they have overwhelming support for same sex marriage.

It helps, I may be an old man ( well older anyway ) but I have kept an open mind.
Big D

Modesto, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184112
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Brian_G wrote:
Proposition 8 won at the polls; that proves same sex marriage is antidemocratic.
If that vote were held today it would fail in a landslide, and on the outside chance that the supreme court surprises me and chooses the wrong way, you will get to see that, as the removal of that will be on the next ballot.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#184113
Mar 22, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>yaYaya, we all evolved from a puddle of crud. lol. If you knew anything about science and the odds of that happening you would change your tune.
A fundie talking about science...LOL.

I pass gas that knows more about odds than you do.
You are talking about odds after the fact.
That's like asking what are the odds Lou Gehrig would have died of Lou Gehrig's disease.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 160,721 - 160,740 of199,087
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

Menifee News Video

•••
•••

Menifee Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Menifee People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••