Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201887 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#180026 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are asserting that all government legislation is sane and legal?
All the states originally disallowed calling gay couples married. Were they ignorant as well?
Or, how about every culture in history?
Even if that's true (Can you name every culture in history?), it doesn't matter. You're just appealing to tradition and popularity. Logical fallacies.
KiMare wrote:
Smile.
Ignorance is bliss.
KiMare wrote:
Clearly you tried to stop and think. You failed, but I appreciate the effort...
You are confusing the action by an element of a culture (a legislative or legal body) with the culture as a whole. That also usually encompasses the whole history of that culture from start to end.
I simply noted that while marriage has been practiced and accepted from start to finish in every single culture in human history. Gay couples being acknowledged as such has yet to have that acceptance in a SINGLE culture in all of human history.
Snicker.
Yep, ignorance is bliss.
Da level

Covina, CA

#180027 Feb 16, 2013
The Glendora, California city council was shamed and slammed to the floor during their own "dog and pony" show the put on for the public at least twice a month.

The intelligence level doesn't raise much above the 3rd grade level.

February 12, 2013 at 7:00 P.M..

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#180028 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Awwwwww.....that's so sweet Trollette....calling me "stupid"......but enough forplay....exactly. All men are treated the same as are all women.
<quoted text>
But men and women aren't treated the same. That's the issue, dummy.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Sigh.....Rosie....Rosie....Ro- seeeee.....the point is, which you already know, is there's no need to put urinals in the ladies room, or tampon dispensers in the men's room. Just because men and women are equal in the eyes of the law, doesn't mean everything needs to be the same.
Whatever.
That has nothing to do with the issue.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#180029 Feb 16, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Even if that's true (Can you name every culture in history?), it doesn't matter. You're just appealing to tradition and popularity. Logical fallacies.
<quoted text>
Ignorance is bliss.
<quoted text>
Yep, ignorance is bliss.
Rosie No Ho Ho Ho Ho.....Merry Christmas.

It's an appeal to biology. Quite logical actually. No matter what acceptance there was, or is, of same sex sexual relations,in various places, it didn't automatically translate into marriage or other recognition of same sex unions.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#180030 Feb 16, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
So what?
Many women can't bear a child, and many men can't fertilize an ovum. Our rights shouldn't depend on our reproduction abilities. Sterile people should be able to vote.
As they can. Gay folks can marry too, just like everybody else. See equal treatment.
The physical standards for the military should be practical, and they should not be lowered just to allow some people in. I don't know what the current standards are, but I'm sure there are some women who can pass them, and many men who can't. Bet you can't.
Nor should the standards for marriage be lowered.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#180031 Feb 16, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
But men and women aren't treated the same. That's the issue, dummy.
When was your last prostate exam? If you haven't had one, by gosh, by golly, you call your doctor tomorrow, and demand one. Tell'em the President wants you to be treated equally.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#180032 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
By your "logic" any research done by straight people related to their own orientation is biased. There is a clear conflict of interest, right?
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#180034 Feb 16, 2013

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180035 Feb 16, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
By your "logic" any research done by straight people related to their own orientation is biased. There is a clear conflict of interest, right?
Hardly, the lack of scientific methodology simply confirmed their bias.

Ho, Ho, Ho.
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#180036 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
Nor should the standards for marriage be lowered.
tsk, tsk, tsk.... that certainly doesn't sound pro polygamy.
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#180037 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
When was your last prostate exam? If you haven't had one, by gosh, by golly, you call your doctor tomorrow, and demand one. Tell'em the President wants you to be treated equally.
Right after you get a pap smear and a mamogram...
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#180038 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Do u expect adult insults with the moniker you've chosen?
I have no expectations for someone stupid enough to write: "after all there are just as many races as there are genders." You're just a garden variety dumbass.
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#180039 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The Regnerus study was challenged and found to be the largest, most scientific study to date.
The study I noted was disqualified by peer review, not just for a small and selective study group with no comparisons, but with extremely dubious information collecting methods.
Here is a challenge; Find me a study that lists it's study methods and challenges the Regnerus findings.
Smile.
Oh puh-leez. The Regnerus' "study" is a textbook case of methodology mistakes.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#180040 Feb 16, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>Right after you get a pap smear and a mamogram...
You just made his point.

http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php...

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#180041 Feb 16, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no expectations for someone stupid enough to write: "after all there are just as many races as there are genders." You're just a garden variety dumbass.
Isn't he great ladies and gentlemen....living proof that Darwin was right. Why would you think, assuming you can and that you haven't exhausted your limited intellectual storage conjuring up that clever moniker, why anyone, with any semblance of intelligence, would care what "Neil Andblowme" has to say?
de leveled

Covina, CA

#180042 Feb 16, 2013
I was told they plowed these "out of towners" BS under along time ago.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#180043 Feb 16, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh puh-leez. The Regnerus' "study" is a textbook case of methodology mistakes.
Thanks for your "unbiased" opinion.

Smirk.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#180044 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't he great ladies and gentlemen....living proof that Darwin was right. Why would you think, assuming you can and that you haven't exhausted your limited intellectual storage conjuring up that clever moniker, why anyone, with any semblance of intelligence, would care what "Neil Andblowme" has to say?
Or "Aida Lott", "Mona Lott", "Sue Wee", "Jane Dodo", or "Frankie's Pudenda"!
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#180045 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't he great ladies and gentlemen....living proof that Darwin was right. Why would you think, assuming you can and that you haven't exhausted your limited intellectual storage conjuring up that clever moniker, why anyone, with any semblance of intelligence, would care what "Neil Andblowme" has to say?
I have no expectations for someone stupid enough to write: "after all there are just as many races as there are genders." You're just a garden variety dumbass.
Neil Andblowme

West New York, NJ

#180046 Feb 16, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for your "unbiased" opinion.
Smirk.
You are welcome. A third grader could spot Regnerus' errors.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Review: Final Strike Martial Arts 23 hr Barb 27
Legalized Panhandling @ Stater Bros!!! Menifee (Apr '10) Thu Well Well 10
Quail Valley Music Thread Nov 24 Musikologist 1
Menifee- will it take a turn for the worst? (Aug '09) Nov 23 Pantiks 92
News Police Say Baby Of Lake Elsinore Murder Victim OK (Oct '07) Nov 20 Macahdo 68
Doctors in area Nov 20 Shelly92 1
Donovan Kearns Nov 19 barstowmule 4

Menifee Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Menifee Mortgages