Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 200,977

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178747 Feb 7, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually gave a damn about ",marriage equality", you'd see that others, polygamists, just might want in on that too.
Polygamists already have marriage equality.
Next.
GlassEye

Monrovia, CA

#178752 Feb 7, 2013
The glass eye of fate is watching you.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#178753 Feb 7, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamists already have marriage equality.
Next.
Rose

Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#178754 Feb 7, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?
Polygamists already have marriage equality.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178756 Feb 7, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?
Why not come up with a fresh argument that actually details why SSM should be illegal?

Kimare says SSM is here and there's nothing "y'all" can do about it.

Man up and get on with your lives (so says Kimare).

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178757 Feb 7, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You are fading out.
And boring.
Must be humiliating...
Smirk smile.
... I am also correct.

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178758 Feb 7, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Rose
Why not include polygamists/ plural marriage practioners in the marriage equality movement? If the objective is to "expand" who can marry, it makes sense to include plural marriage. What exactly is the issue?
I would like to understand your viewpoint on a couple items. Would you kindly please clarify:
1) Are you in favor of polygamy or against it?
2) Are you in favor of SSM or against it?
Thank you in advance.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178759 Feb 7, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
I would like to understand your viewpoint on a couple items. Would you kindly please clarify:
1) Are you in favor of polygamy or against it?
2) Are you in favor of SSM or against it?
Thank you in advance.
I am in favor of same sex marriage and polygamy.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178760 Feb 7, 2013
Imprtnrd wrote:
<quoted text>There is NO equality in a polygamy marriage. Other than that.....it's a go.
?
Nay Nay

Corona, CA

#178761 Feb 7, 2013
Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>Government healthcare? What have you got against Medicare?
That I have to pay a penalty if I don't want it, mainly.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178762 Feb 8, 2013
chance47 wrote:
<quoted text>
... I am also correct.
In the Egyptian sense of the word...

Smile.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#178763 Feb 8, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not come up with a fresh argument that actually details why SSM should be illegal?
There's no compelling need for it. Why, in the 21st century, is there a sudden need for men to "marry" men, or women to "marry" women?
Kimare says SSM is here and there's nothing "y'all" can do about it.
Maybe....maybe not. Perhaps its "growth" can be halted.
Man up and get on with your lives (so says Kimare).
Or "woman up", I suppose.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178764 Feb 8, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not come up with a fresh argument that actually details why SSM should be illegal?
Kimare says SSM is here and there's nothing "y'all" can do about it.
Man up and get on with your lives (so says Kimare).
There is no such thing as ssm. Marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Gay couples would only qualify as 'unmarriage'.

8000 years of human history has repeatedly affirmed that any minor rise of homosexual couple acceptance is extremely short lived. I'm betting on a repeat.

Man up and quit trying to infringe on benefits and rights of women and children!

Smirk.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#178765 Feb 8, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes he is using it as the standard diversionary tactic used by most opposed to same sex marriage, which is why most of us donít believe him when he says he is for it.
No one has been able to come up with any valid reason not to allow same sex marriage, not even in court, that is why you are losing court battle after court battle.
So they go after the bait and switch diversionary tactic.
It will still fail of course, justice will win and you will lose.
It is already legal in a growing number of states and countries, you are on the wrong side of history.
Missouri put its ban back into place.
Largelanguage

Chester, UK

#178766 Feb 8, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Even funnier? The fact you think that analogy is apt.
Stupid, you don't have to be able to spawn in order to marry.
Period.
<quoted text>
Is your mutation a blunder? A defect? Should you have been aborted?
After all, you don't just say you are a mutation, but a monster mutation.
LOL!
You have to spawn and be born in order to exist, and you have to exist in order to marry.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

#178767 Feb 8, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to spawn and be born in order to exist, and you have to exist in order to marry.
Actually, many people exist who have never spawned.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178768 Feb 8, 2013
Questforbrains wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, many people exist who have never spawned.
Really????!!!!

Here is school for the day;

1. Every person who exists was spawned. No exceptions.

2. Marriage is the natural and best place for humans to spawn when they are ready and if they can. That is why marriage is a unique relationship, distinct from contracts and friendships.

3. No gay couple has ever pro-spawned. Zero. Ever. Anywhere.

Smirk.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#178769 Feb 8, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Ten years ago there wasn't a reality show about a polygamous family, now there's two.
Just like the Duggars begat the Bateses, the Brown family of TLCís Sister Wives has begat the Dargers. It seems like once every TLC reality show starts to get a little stale or repetitive the producers bring in another family for their stars to hang out with. Recently, the Dargers were featured on Sister Wives as a fellow polygamous family. On the show, we met husband Joe and wives Alina, Vicki, and Valerie.
<quoted text>
So far 32 states say otherwise. Perhaps we could annex Canada, to even out the numbers for ya.
Some of the same countries that have legal ssm, also have polygamist communities. The Brits already recognize foreign poly marriages for welfare bennies. The polys are right there with ya, Big D, as in de-nigh-yal
Used to be 50, now it is 32 and droppiing

There is no way to spin that you way
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

#178770 Feb 8, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes he is using it as the standard diversionary tactic used by most opposed to same sex marriage, which is why most of us donít believe him when he says he is for it.
No one has been able to come up with any valid reason not to allow same sex marriage, not even in court, that is why you are losing court battle after court battle.
So they go after the bait and switch diversionary tactic.
It will still fail of course, justice will win and you will lose.
It is already legal in a growing number of states and countries, you are on the wrong side of history.
"Most of us"? Do you have a few mice in your pocket? Who is "most of us"?

What a jackass!

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#178771 Feb 8, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
"Most of us"? Do you have a few mice in your pocket? Who is "most of us"?
What a jackass!
You just made the top ten. Congratulations.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 17 hr scoop 2,273
is it okay to make out with your sister (Feb '11) Thu Veronica 10
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) Thu zhuzhamm 5,079
Californians fight over migrants Thu Cat74 143
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) Thu Pizza 16,000
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) Sep 17 Blazing saddles 7,954
Re-Elect Tom Fuhrman Menifee City Council Sep 15 Righthand Man 18
•••

Menifee News Video

•••
•••

Menifee Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Menifee People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Menifee News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Menifee
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••