Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,747

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170749 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>

Loving v VA stated marriage is a right.
Why lie? It's so easy to look it up.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/histori...
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.

You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..

It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170750 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.
You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..
It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.
Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170751 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
WTF are you blabbing about now Rose?
Dummy, you said I wanted a cracker. So, you are trying to insult my bf. Do you know what "bf" stands for? Guess not, it stands for "boy friend".

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170752 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like you are the one avoiding Rose. You failed to answer for your lies.
I didn't lie, dummy.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170753 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, stupid, are you trying to deny Loving v VA states marriage is a right?
No moron, I am stating the fact that it merely upheld the previous precedent established in Skinner v Oklahoma.

I am sorry that you don't know how to read the opinion of the court.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170754 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't lie, dummy.
Tactic 7

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170755 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Tactic 7
Only tactic

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170756 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Only tactic
Only? No, you have 7 of them..
LurnaDoones

Covina, CA

#170757 Dec 10, 2012
Still stalking people, I see.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#170758 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Only? No, you have 7 of them..
Stupid, I was talking about your only tactic.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170759 Dec 10, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Stupid, I was talking about your only tactic.
Pot, meet kettle.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170760 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot, meet kettle.
Do you think Rose_NoHo maybe had a stroke or something? Maybe she's over medicated?

Seriously, she used to be almost credible with some decent arguments. For quite a while she's just been a blathering idiot. What do you think is up with the old girl? I can't ask her. She won't talk to me.

“SCOTUS will Rule in June for”

Since: Aug 08

MARRIAGE EQUALITY:-)

#170761 Dec 10, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no debating with single celled tranny ho's.......
There's no debating with single-cell brainless idiots like yourself who have nothing to being to the discussion except insults towards a poster who has obviously kicked your azz on more than one occasion......lol!!!

“SCOTUS will Rule in June for”

Since: Aug 08

MARRIAGE EQUALITY:-)

#170762 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot, meet kettle.
Another one who just has to hurdle insults towards Rose because obviously she has gotten under your skin........why don't you simply ignore her if ya don't like her comments? or maybe that's just it......you need to insult her in order to make yourself feel better.......either way your tactics only make you look small.....and I don't believe you are!!!!

“SCOTUS will Rule in June for”

Since: Aug 08

MARRIAGE EQUALITY:-)

#170763 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Rose, it's easy to look up, not so easy for you to comprehend.
You do realize why Loving V Virginia referenced Skinner V Oklahoma when making the statement that marriage was a "right" don't you? Because that was the SOURCE..
It's OK puppet, we don't expect much from you.
But Skinner vs Oklahoma wasn't about the right to marry, it was about the right to procreate and that the right couldn't be taken away just like the right to marry can't be taken away!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170764 Dec 10, 2012
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Another one who just has to hurdle insults towards Rose because obviously she has gotten under your skin........why don't you simply ignore her if ya don't like her comments? or maybe that's just it......you need to insult her in order to make yourself feel better.......either way your tactics only make you look small.....and I don't believe you are!!!!
Yawn..

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#170765 Dec 10, 2012
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no debating with single-cell brainless idiots like yourself who have nothing to being to the discussion except insults towards a poster who has obviously kicked your azz on more than one occasion......lol!!!
She says while insulting the poster and bringing nothing to the discussion.

Priceless!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#170766 Dec 10, 2012
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
But Skinner vs Oklahoma wasn't about the right to marry, it was about the right to procreate and that the right couldn't be taken away just like the right to marry can't be taken away!!!
Time for an Education:

"Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race." Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson - 316 U.S. 535 (1942)

Note that there is no citation- Why? Because it is the SOURCE!!

What is different about Loving v Virginia?

"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "

Oh, look at that, a citation. Imagine that, the SCOTUS referenced Skinner v Oklahoma when establishing a "right" to marriage.

And you explanation in regards to the meaning of the Skinner v Oklahoma is lacking as well.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#170767 Dec 10, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Time for an Education:
"Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race." Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson - 316 U.S. 535 (1942)
Note that there is no citation- Why? Because it is the SOURCE!!
What is different about Loving v Virginia?
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535, 541 (1942). "
Oh, look at that, a citation. Imagine that, the SCOTUS referenced Skinner v Oklahoma when establishing a "right" to marriage.
And you explanation in regards to the meaning of the Skinner v Oklahoma is lacking as well.
Nonsense. There is no marriage license required for procreation. Skinner was a 40s court decision about mandatory sterilization of a mentally disabled individual. What's more, procreation is not a legal requirement of marriage. Procreation is a fundamental right and so is the right to marry the person of your choice.

Are you trying to be funny?

“SCOTUS will Rule in June for”

Since: Aug 08

MARRIAGE EQUALITY:-)

#170768 Dec 10, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
She says while insulting the poster and bringing nothing to the discussion.
Priceless!
I've brought to this discussion in the beginning.....now it's just a bunch of trolls who have nothing better to do but insult others.......and akpilot can yawn all he wants, but he usually has good stuff except when he lowers himself to a level of someone he can't seem to ignore!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Experienced Group of Con Artists occupying my h... (May '13) 15 hr inquiring mind 157
bradley rd. Mar 23 DMJBF 3
News Gurzi Pleads Guilty, Sentenced to 12 Years in P... (Dec '07) Mar 22 tracy 8
Reckless People!!! Mar 22 Concerned 1
Ktistie Rose , and Rebecca Messer - 1st service... Mar 19 ray 1
Diabetes: I believe it's due to obesity Mar 17 ignorancekillsus 17
inquiry of Carlos Perez (May '11) Mar 16 RompeCulos 149
Menifee Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Menifee People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]