Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201480 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

What a waste

La Puente, CA

#146879 Jun 21, 2012
What a waste!

Too those id's who post their hate filled posting haven't fallen to sleep by now?
lame

Roseville, CA

#146880 Jun 21, 2012
i hate marriage. all it does is hurt people. i wish marriage was illegal. ive been married for 16 years. my hisband and i have a home, a child we own a business ( which has been stressful ). i just found out he and our business banker have been talking and texting. i found the text which said he couldnt wait to get to know her better. my feeling are crushed and so is my heart. i thought he was the last person to ever do something like that. a few days ago i had a breakdown about it, he told me to grow up and get over it. he couldnt take that i was breaking down so he charged me in the hallway, hit me in the chest so hard my feet came off the ground, i hit my head on the floor really hard and have 4 large dark bruises on the arm. i hate marriage.
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#146883 Jun 21, 2012
Sir Doctor 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Do not blame the gays, they are fed a bunch of lies and they don't know nay better. Gays are simply trying to be happy, but the gay leadership only wants martyrs.
What a FAUX Cheistian human piece of shyte says! So,you're a charter member of NAMBLA and you just had sex with a baby? WoW you sure are one sick S.O.B.! All that because that reparative therapy failed and you're now mad at the world! What a sick low life fuque you are! Turn yourself in before you hurt any more innocent children! And for titty F-ing Christ,unchain that little boy you have chained in your basement you ugly sick fugger! Sheesh!
Letit hang

Sacramento, CA

#146884 Jun 21, 2012
If everyone thought like you people who support same sex marriage , you wouldn't even be alive speaking right now!! You better be glad you had a mommy and daddy that created you, that's how our body were made, can a man have a baby? Certainly not, the almighty God loves you but your just 1 of his confused children ..;)

“"Boss Of Bosses"”

Since: Dec 11

New York New York

#146887 Jun 21, 2012
Letit hang wrote:
If everyone thought like you people who support same sex marriage , you wouldn't even be alive speaking right now!! You better be glad you had a mommy and daddy that created you, that's how our body were made, can a man have a baby? Certainly not, the almighty God loves you but your just 1 of his confused children ..;)
Well then,it's a good thing that hetero couples keep pumping out gays then isn't it! Not to bright are you sparky! Like the world is in danger of a lack of procreation? Don't know if you've heard but the planet is over populated as it is! Pointless post,try again! LOL

“"Boss Of Bosses"”

Since: Dec 11

New York New York

#146888 Jun 21, 2012
Sir Doctor 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Rose, I told some newbie that you were smart, then you post this dumb stuff. Rose, if you are not mentally deranged now, then based on your post you were mentally deranged when you were having sex with men and had a child by a man, since you had what you don't want a D!CK. So, that means that you enjiyed he right TO FRUCK A MAN....YUMMY FOR YOU!!!!
You little girls can't handle the fact that men do not want you, because they prefer young feminine women. MEN JUST ARE NOT INTERESTED IN YOU.
Take care.
Well then I guess that just means more men for you! LOL,Go away you psychotic sociopath!

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Indianapolis, IN

#146889 Jun 21, 2012
How do we Guard Against Future Jerry Sanduskys?

The media has been ever so careful about mentioning the obvious about the Penn State Sandusky case; namely, Sandusky is a flaming queer.

This is not rocket science -- a male who's attracted to boys the way this guy was, wants to engage in homosexual sex with them. If he wanted heterosexual sex he'd be after girls.

No matter, the LGBT tells us he's a pedophile NOT a homosexual. But this promotes the notion the two can't coexist, something no science this poster has ever heard of supports.

Add to this, teenage boys are hardly "children", at least biologically speaking.

Indeed, it would seem the LGBT willfully confuses legal construct with biology. They would have us believe any male below 18 is a child and thus the sexual orientation in operation can only be pedophilia.

This is ridiculous and we must stop the LGBT from getting away with this kind of self-serving propaganda.

Sandusky is a gay male, just like pedophile priests are. He's a gay male whose targets are other males, albeit young ones.

He's a gay male.

Get over it.

“WAY TO GO”

Since: Mar 11

IRELAND

#146890 Jun 21, 2012
Sir Doctor 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Rose, I told some newbie that you were smart, then you post this dumb stuff. Rose, if you are not mentally deranged now, then based on your post you were mentally deranged when you were having sex with men and had a child by a man, since you had what you don't want a D!CK. So, that means that you enjiyed he right TO FRUCK A MAN....YUMMY FOR YOU!!!!
You little girls can't handle the fact that men do not want you, because they prefer young feminine women. MEN JUST ARE NOT INTERESTED IN YOU.
Take care.
You'd have to understand why the post was made......and regardless of what I did before coming to terms with my sexual orientation......having sex with a man, was nothing special.......back then, I hoped it would have been.
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#146896 Jun 22, 2012
Sir Doctor 7 wrote:
<quoted text>You know, all we ask is that gays be honest and consistent.
If they claim that Alexander the Great as gay, then they have to accept that Adolf Hitler and Jerry Sandusky were gay.
Alexander was married three times to three different women and he had two children.
All addictions are inherently born from access. America does not have an opium addiction problem, due to the lack of access. America does have a gay pedophile problem, due to the access of men to boys.
There are only three reasons that we are just now hearing about it:
1. The boys were filled with shame
2. Boys don't talk
3. Women were too busy being the victims, and even now they don't want to share it.
And I find it simply amazing Dr. Douche that the VAST majority of both psychologists and psychiatrists say you are in fact full of ca ca! LOL,But you keep on ranting and spewing out the lie's as that's what you do best! Bottom line,the reparative therapy didn't work for you now did it! Go back under that rock you bigoted hating phony Christian! No one believes you because you are in fact in dire need of psychological help yourself! Now go back to your "GOD" is a fairy tale thread and STOP LYING through your teeth,we all see right through you,you sick fuque!
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#146897 Jun 22, 2012
Sir Doctor 7 wrote:
<quoted text>Just you man, just you. Not all gays are like you.
So sorry Dr. Douche,I'm not a self-repressed hateful gay like you are! Just ask Rose Th,she will vouch for me but then when did you ever care about the truth! Take your hatred and lie's and shove them up your sick ass!

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Indianapolis, IN

#146898 Jun 22, 2012
Sir Doctor 7 wrote:
<quoted text>You know, all we ask is that gays be honest and consistent.
If they claim that Alexander the Great as gay, then they have to accept that Adolf Hitler and Jerry Sandusky were gay.
Alexander was married three times to three different women and he had two children.
All addictions are inherently born from access. America does not have an opium addiction problem, due to the lack of access. America does have a gay pedophile problem, due to the access of men to boys.
There are only three reasons that we are just now hearing about it:
1. The boys were filled with shame
2. Boys don't talk
3. Women were too busy being the victims, and even now they don't want to share it.
You may remember how these guys were defending the "sexual" practices in "The Little Black Book."

These practices included anal sex, pee play, fisting, rimming.

This booklet was billed as a "sex manual" for youth. Indeed, the booklet came to light because it was on a display table at a youth Conference at a Brookline high school.

This is documented fact; what isn't widely known, however, is that the booklet was handed to each child who entered the Cambridge "Youth on Fire" drop-in center for runaway youth. That's kids as young as 14. I know this to be fact because a year ago I called up the place and asked if they "were still giving out the booklet?" The gay guy who answered the phone told me they had stopped handing it out a few month earlier.

The point is, the gay men handing out the booklet saw nothing wrong with it. In fact, they saw themselves as doing a public service -- teaching kids about safe sex.

But what are gay men doing in these youth agencies anyway? In Massachusetts -- thanks to same sex marriage, gay men have entirely taken over the youth health industry.

How this happened I don't know; all I know is that in a few short years they've completely sexualized it. Suddenly, kids are receiving instructing on the proper way to do anal sex, pee play, fisting.

And then there's the male escort ads on your tax-supported youth agency websites like this:
http://www.ccaa.org/pump.html

One of the ways they get away with this crap is sticking the words "HIV/AIDS" in all their projects. Then they announce their client base are all HIV/AIDS "at risk kids" and from their they can do anything they want.

They really have it down cold. Sticking "HIV-AIDS" in their work means they can also get away with hiring nothing but other gays, which they do.

Personally, I believe these agencies are all recruiting stations for male escort services. I think they take these kids in, give them the Little Black Book, then farm them out to sex agencies like Rent-a-Boy.

Bottom line, there's no coexisting with homosexuals -- anyone who believes there is, is a fool.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#146901 Jun 22, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
What part of "not healthy" don't we understand?
The part where you errantly think you may reject the judgment of another individual and substitute your own.

We live in a free society, and people are free to make their own choices, even if those choices are not healthy. People CHOOSE to smoke, drink to excess, and engage in promiscuous sex with multiple partners. The law does nothing to stop any of these behaviors, because we DO live in a FREE society.

If you feel that homosexuality is wrong, then don't engage in homosexual acts or marry someone of the same sex.

I think your afraid of equality because legal access to a homosexual relationship might entice you to come out of the closet. I assure you, everyone is better off if you stay put.

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#146903 Jun 22, 2012
Quest wrote:
However, if you are trying to create a "sex test" for a marriage license, you need to exclude all heterosexual couples that engage in sexual acts you find gross and icky, as well.
How do you propose to do that?
That won't be necessary.
It seems that Prof Marvel missed the US Supreme Court decision in Lawrence v Texas.

"This case does not involve minors, persons who might be injured or coerced, those who might not easily refuse consent, or public conduct or prostitution. It does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. Petitioners' right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in private conduct without government intervention."

Simply put, the government has no legitimate interest in the sex lives of others. Apparently it leaves that for Prof Marvel.

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Indianapolis, IN

#146904 Jun 22, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
And of course heterosexuals engage in ALL of the same types of sexual activity that gay folks do. Even the ones you think are "icky". But you seem to be obsessed only with what a gay male does.
Odd.
I haven't engaged in any of the ones you have listed here, finding them a bit "icky" personally, but it would never occur to me to deny legal marriage to anyone who might engage in them. It's simply none of my business. Someone had to explain "rimming" to me, a while back, and it was a straight person who was quite familiar with it.
Go figure.
However, if you are trying to create a "sex test" for a marriage license, you need to exclude all heterosexual couples that engage in sexual acts you find gross and icky, as well.
How do you propose to do that?
A questionnaire? Lie detectors? How would you PROVE that another person is have a type of sex that is "proscribed" by law? And who gets to decide which ones are?
I will never understand the sexual obsessions of irrational bigots. I guess the key word is "irrational".
But that's just it -- homosexuality is "irrational" yet we're being told to teach children it's a perfectly rational behavior.

Boys find it repulsive; this is apparently a natural reaction. I come from a family of five boys one of whom was gay and we were continually repulsed by him. Gays argue that our reaction was a learned behavior, but if so, who taught us it?

It wasn't a learned behavior.

When a gay boy tries to kiss the hetero boy, the hetero boy is repulsed -- for weren't he, one thing would lead to another and they'd be behind the barn giving each other reach-arounds.

But today you say we must teach him not to be repulsed -- we must teach him to receive the kiss and give the gay boy one back.

That's what you'd like to see, isn't it?

And you call me irrational?

And your other argument -- that anal sex is rational behavior because some heteros do it -- doesn't wash either. Some heteros like to be whipped, is that rational? Some like to be peed on.

In other words, you want to do away with the concept of normality; you want to replace it with behaviors such as pee play, rimming, anal sex.

Certainly, there are hetero sex manuals that describe these practices, the difference is these manuals were not produced, published, and distributed by heteros in non-profits using tax dollars. Also, these hetero manuals were not placed in the hands of children.

You fellows were giving The Little Black Book to kids as young as 14. I confirmed this when I called Cambridge's Youth on Fire, a runaway youth drop in center.

You thought you were performing a public service -- teaching kids how to protect themselves sexually. It never occurred to you that you were promoting the very high risk practices you claimed you wanted to teach kids how to do safely.

The bottom line is you fellows are sexualizing everything you touch.

Suddenly there's this urgent need for Straight-Gay clubs in our high schools. You're labeling kids as young as 13 "homosexual" then telling us they need special instruction and special clubs where special gay males will be their mentors.

Thirty year ago your gay activists promised us this was one of the things you'd never do -- messing with the kids -- but now you're all over the place culling "gay kids" from the population and mentoring them.

The latest intuitive is "trans-gender" kids. In Massachusetts you're demanding school boards allow boys in dresses and heels attend class.

The bottom line is, everything in the LGBT agenda is irrational -- yet we're being asked to endorse each plank or risk being called a homophobe.

Well, if that's all you're asking I'm a homophobe and proud of it!

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#146905 Jun 22, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
The bottom line is, everything in the LGBT agenda is irrational -- yet we're being asked to endorse each plank or risk being called a homophobe.

Well, if that's all you're asking I'm a homophobe and proud of it!
The bottom line is that the constitution guarantees legal equality for all persons within a state's jurisdiction, and that guarantee is not dependent upon your opinion, or anyone else's.

As for you being a self-admitted homophobe, you are also an idiot.
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#146906 Jun 22, 2012
Gooooood morning . . . .

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Indianapolis, IN

#146907 Jun 22, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
The part where you errantly think you may reject the judgment of another individual and substitute your own.
We live in a free society, and people are free to make their own choices, even if those choices are not healthy. People CHOOSE to smoke, drink to excess, and engage in promiscuous sex with multiple partners. The law does nothing to stop any of these behaviors, because we DO live in a FREE society.
If you feel that homosexuality is wrong, then don't engage in homosexual acts or marry someone of the same sex.
I think your afraid of equality because legal access to a homosexual relationship might entice you to come out of the closet. I assure you, everyone is better off if you stay put.
Good to see you concede homosexual sex is a morbidly unhealthy behavior. Your understanding of public health, however, is still behind the curve.

By endorsing same-sex marriage Obama sent the message homosexual sex is normal and safe. This message flies in the face of the message the CDC has been putting out for the past 30 years -- homosexual sex is most emphatically unsafe.

The evidence is 365,000 bodies. These people would be alive had they not engaged in male-to-male anal sex. Public health deems we try to stop an epidemic of this magnitude from happening again -- that we discourage male-to-male sex, not promote it.

We don't allow siblings to get married because of public health concerns, why then should we allow a gay couple to get married?

Prof Marvel

“The Great and Wonderful Marvel”

Since: Aug 09

Indianapolis, IN

#146908 Jun 22, 2012
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
The bottom line is that the constitution guarantees legal equality for all persons within a state's jurisdiction, and that guarantee is not dependent upon your opinion, or anyone else's.
As for you being a self-admitted homophobe, you are also an idiot.
You take cock up the ass and I'm an idiot?

And gays have the same right to marry as I do.

What part of that don't you understand, fella?

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#146909 Jun 22, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
Good to see you concede homosexual sex is a morbidly unhealthy behavior.
Your understanding of public health, however, is still behind the curve.
By endorsing same-sex marriage Obama sent the message homosexual sex is normal and safe. This message flies in the face of the message the CDC has been putting out for the past 30 years -- homosexual sex is most emphatically unsafe.
The evidence is 365,000 bodies. These people would be alive had they not engaged in male-to-male anal sex. Public health deems we try to stop an epidemic of this magnitude from happening again -- that we discourage male-to-male sex, not promote it.
Wake up and smell reality. Lawrence v Texas held that there is no legitimate state interest in the sexual conduct of consenting adults within their privacy of their own home.

Are you really so stupid as to believe that denying same sex couples the right to legally marry will prevent them from having sex? If so, thereís a bridge in Brooklyn Iíd like to sell you. If you arenít that stupid, then you are knowingly making an argument that you know is BS.
Prof Marvel wrote:
We don't allow siblings to get married because of public health concerns, why then should we allow a gay couple to get married?
Actually those are for the health concerns regarding offspring, which is not an issue with same sex marriage. As per usual, you continue to rationalize, but offer no valid arguments against same sex marriage.
Prof Marvel wrote:
You take cock up the ass and I'm an idiot?
First of all, I am not gay. You have been told this on several occasions, so if you have an inability to process that fact, that is your deficiency.
Secondly, yes, you are an idiot.
Prof Marvel wrote:
And gays have the same right to marry as I do.
What part of that don't you understand, fella?
Hereís the problem with that argument Sparky. You are relying upon the rationalization that a gay man has the right to marry a woman, or a gay woman has the right to marry a man. First of all, for them to do so would be both irrational, and would result in a sham marriage (I find it interesting that those defending traditional marriage often stoop to promoting sham marriages to do so); second, there is no rational basis for restricting the legal protections of marriage to being between a man and a woman.

To do so abridges the rights of same sex couples to marry the adult consenting partner of their choosing, and there is no legitimate state interest served sy such a restriction.
Bruno

Redondo Beach, CA

#146910 Jun 22, 2012
lides ... are you having a bad morning ??????

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Menifee Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Moreno Valley: Six arrested in connection with ... 15 hr Kenny 2
Menifee Authors (Feb '15) Jun 13 286author 5
Is Menifee Racist? Jun 13 StopHate5 19
News Cities will never win if they play by Californi... Jun 12 Solarman 1
The best adult hookup dating site Wildomar Jun 6 Luis Diego 1
News Some people are still debating the Southwest ar... Jun 3 c45author 1
Golden Corral is located at 1834 N. Perris Blvd... (Mar '12) May 30 ditka 18

Menifee Jobs

Personal Finance

Menifee Mortgages