Who do you support for U.S. Senate in New York in 2010?

[One Who Knows]

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
What a useless putz, can you hold your breathe for an hour? No, well try anyway.

You already answered this post once. Maybe you need to start keeping some kind of record of what you reply to since your short-term memory seems to be incapacitated.

[Goober of Gloversville]

One Who Knows wrote:

<quoted text>
You already answered this post once. Maybe you need to start keeping some kind of record of what you reply to since your short-term memory seems to be incapacitated.

Don't worry Mr. One, obama won, now everything is going to be fair,hahahahahahahhahahahahaha LMAO.

[Generations of Inbreeding]

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry Mr. One, obama won, now everything is going to be fair,hahahahahahahhahahahahaha LMAO.

You bet !

We're gonna 'fairly' shove it up the repuke's a$$es...FAIRLY !

You'll all get to take a turn, hillbilly !

ROFLMSLAO !

[Money where ur mouth is]

Generations of Inbreeding wrote:

<quoted text>
You bet !
We're gonna 'fairly' shove it up the repuke's a$$es...FAIRLY !
You'll all get to take a turn, hillbilly !
ROFLMSLAO !

ROFL !

His daddy/Uncle/Cousin already introduced him to a Mr. Ben Dover !

ROFLMSLAO !

[gloversville INBREED CAP]

The scum hole of nowhereville is the top welfare scum hole. Thank God obammy and his primate steal money from whites so your town doesn't starve to death. We know with your religious beliefs you won't eat the sheep you mate.

[Teddy R]

One Who Knows wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's a fact for you - The October deficit is less than it was in October of 2008, 2009 and 2010.
Funny how that cut and paste article didn't mention that.
Fool. lol

<golfclap>

All wholly unprecedented, unsustainable, and unacceptable levels of deficit.

And thus your facts and "point" = utterly worthless.

Again the fool.

[One Who Knows]

Teddy R wrote:

<quoted text>
<golfclap>
All wholly unprecedented, unsustainable, and unacceptable levels of deficit.
And thus your facts and "point" = utterly worthless.
Again the fool.

lol Dance, puppet, dance.

[One Who Knows]

Goober of Gloversville wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry Mr. One, obama won, now everything is going to be fair,hahahahahahahhahahahahaha LMAO.

I expected a halfway intelligent response from you but I guess my optimism gets the better of me when dealing with the ignorant. You are a disappointment.

[De Oppresso Liber]

One who knows......knows nothing.

[Wake Up]

Obama the tool of wall street.

[Generation of Inbreeding]

Wake Up wrote:

Obama the tool of wall street.

Well, nice try, Hillbilly :

". Whenever an individual contributes to a campaign, they have to list their employer. This is the information that is used to summarize contributions from various companies and sectors. So if a bank teller contributes $50.00 to a campaign, its listed as part of the total for her bank as well as the financial sector as a whole.

4. Some individuals ask their friends/co-workers to make a contribution and "bundle" all of those checks together. Obama is the only candidate who reports the names of bundlers, where they work, and the total amount of their contribution.

One reason Obama's totals per company are much smaller than Romney's is that 46% of his contributions from these employees have been from what are considered "small donors,'(less than $200) whereas only 10% of Romney's fall in that category.

So the next time a poutrager tells you President Obama is beholden to Wall Street because they're funding his campaign - let them know that is complete bs."

http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2011/10/t ...

In other wwords, Jethro......

Obama got contributions from all the PEONS that work at those companies on Walls Street (hoping Obama could deliver them from corporate greed)

whereas

Romney and his cronies got HIS wall street moneis from the upper echelons of these Wall Street thieves.

Apples and oranges, ya inbred mudderfugger !

[Bently Benard Baxter]

justicedenied13501 wrote:

Kirsten Gillibrand...just more rhetoric

here here

[Sour Graps]

Bently Benard Baxter wrote:

<quoted text>here here

SOUR GRAPES !

President Gillibrand '16 !

[Papaland]

Sour Graps wrote:

<quoted text>
SOUR GRAPES !
President Gillibrand '16 !

More incompetence

[keep Dreaming]

That's for sure Papa

[De Oppresso Liber]

Gillibrand? Does anybody remember the incident on the plane with schumer calling the stewardess a "Bitch" for telling him to turn off his cellphone for departure? Do you know who he was confiding his remarks to, but overheard by the stewardess? Sitting next to him , the Whore from New York, Gillibrand, with her silence, she condoned his remarks.

Once published, schumer had to apologize to the stewardess and passengers.

[the future]

Nicer try Citidiot, your grant taking and government raised inbreeding shows. Your savior Obamas has his cabinet filled with wall street insiders and lobbyists from Goodman Sachs. Gietner and Bernacky to name a few. Obama is quite the corporate whore, JP Morgan Chace, Morgan Stanley, Citi group, General Electric, Microsoft and many may other transnational corporations. Where is all the stimulus money? Benacky says he doesn't know. Ill tell you where it is in the pockets of all of Obamas wall street cronies. That money will be paid back by working people..or maybe they don't plan on paying it back at all once everything collapses. Bananas and my nuts you "Citidiot" daddyfugger

Generation of Inbreeding wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, nice try, Hillbilly :
". Whenever an individual contributes to a campaign, they have to list their employer. This is the information that is used to summarize contributions from various companies and sectors. So if a bank teller contributes $50.00 to a campaign, its listed as part of the total for her bank as well as the financial sector as a whole.
4. Some individuals ask their friends/co-workers to make a contribution and "bundle" all of those checks together. Obama is the only candidate who reports the names of bundlers, where they work, and the total amount of their contribution.
One reason Obama's totals per company are much smaller than Romney's is that 46% of his contributions from these employees have been from what are considered "small donors,'(less than $200) whereas only 10% of Romney's fall in that category.
So the next time a poutrager tells you President Obama is beholden to Wall Street because they're funding his campaign - let them know that is complete bs."
http://immasmartypants.blogspot.com/2011/10/t ...
In other wwords, Jethro......
Obama got contributions from all the PEONS that work at those companies on Walls Street (hoping Obama could deliver them from corporate greed)
whereas
Romney and his cronies got HIS wall street moneis from the upper echelons of these Wall Street thieves.
Apples and oranges, ya inbred mudderfugger !

[keep Dreaming]

the future is true

[author]

none of the above..all atheists!

[keep Dreaming]

not so true we all must believe before it is to late