New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

[obama vomit]

obarna vomit wrote:

<quoted text>
I totally agree. There's a dude on here who keeps uses "obama vomit" - which is close to my ID, and it really grinds my grapes!

Your posts would make obama vomit

[obarna vomit]

obama vomit wrote:

<quoted text>
Your posts would make obama vomit

do me a favor, pal...GET YOUR OWN ID!!!!!

Seriously, quite trolling and be original, why don't you?

[De Opresssor Liber]

obama vomit wrote:

<quoted text>
Your posts would make obama vomit

Seriously...get your own ID and leave obarna vomit alone.

[obama vomit]

De Opresssor Liber wrote:

<quoted text>
Seriously...get your own ID and leave obarna vomit alone.

Listen up Maggot, the Motto is, De Oppresso Liber

Try to squeeze something original of your own out of your little liberal pea brain.

[TrollBot]

obarna vomit wrote:

<quoted text>
(Another juvenile and inane troll snipped)

Troll. Ignore.

"Helping ignore trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."

[TrollBot]

Scumbag Imposter De Opresssor Liber wrote:

<quoted text>
(Another juvenile and inane troll snipped)

Troll. Ignore.

"Helping ignore trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."

[Teddy R]

obarna vomit wrote:

<quoted text>
(Another juvenile troll snipped)

Troll. Ignore.

"Helping ignore trolls until Topix lets you killfile the scum."

[the doctor]

This thread is just too funny, some of you should audition at a comedy club.

[Funny]

This is funny

[obama vomit]

the doctor wrote:

This thread is just too funny, some of you should audition at a comedy club.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Bruser]

Contact your county sheriff :

COUNTY SHERIFFS CAN BLOCK FEDERAL GUN LAWS:
President Obama has given his comic sidekick the task of pushing gun control measures through Congress. Democrats and some liberal Republicans are calling for more gun control after the tragic shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Some state and municipal politicians, like the #1 anti-gun person in the nation – New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, are also calling for more control.
But did you know that no matter what gun control laws are passed by the federal government, they can only be enforced in your area if your county sheriff allows them to be.
. This was established from the time of the Founding Fathers and upheld by the US Supreme Court in the 1997 case of Printz v. United States.
The case involved new federal regulations involved with the Brady Bill and gun control. FBI agents went around to the various county sheriffs and demanded that they follow the new federal guidelines. Then Graham County (AZ) Sheriff Richard Mack and several others saw the Brady Bill as being unconstitutional and refused to impose the new federal guidelines. Part of their defense was that the county sheriff was the supreme law enforcement officer over their county and that the federal government could not supersede their legal authority.
In the court’s decision, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote:
“... The great innovation of this design was that ‘our citizens would have two political capacities, one state and one federal, each protected from incursion by the other’”–“a legal system unprecedented in form and design, establishing two orders of government, each with its own direct relationship, its own privity, its own set of mutual rights and obligations to the people who sustain it and are governed by it.”(P.920)
Justice Scalia then quoted the man considered to be the Father of the US Constitution, President James Madison, when he wrote in the decision:
“[T]he local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere.” The Federalist, No. 39 at 245.
Scalia then referred to Gregory, 501 US at 458 when he wrote:
“This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution’s structural protections of liberty:‘Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.’...”
Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”(P. 922).
In other words, the county sheriff is the highest governmental authority in his county and he does not have to bow to the tyranny of the federal government if he deems such actions to be unconstitutional or unlawful. In essence, the county sheriff has more legal authority within his county than the governor or the state or even the president of the United States.
Today, former Sheriff Richard Mack works with a number of county sheriffs throughout the county, helping them understand the extent of their authority and how they can legally defy the federal government. I would highly recommend that you contact your county sheriff and see if he/she is aware of their powers and duties. If not, get them in contact with Mack and urge your county sheriff to stand up against upcoming unconstitutional gun laws that the liberals are going to try to impose on us.

CLICK ON THE LINK:http://rightmarch.com/201 3/01/county-sheriffs-can-block -federal-gun-control/

[obarna vomit]

"....
But did you know that no matter what gun control laws are passed by the federal government, they can only be enforced in your area if your county sheriff allows them to be.
. This was established from the time of the Founding Fathers and upheld by the US Supreme Court in the 1997 case of Printz v. United States.
The case involved new federal regulations involved with the Brady Bill and gun control. FBI agents went around to the various county sheriffs and demanded that they follow the new federal guidelines. Then Graham County (AZ) Sheriff Richard Mack and several others saw the Brady Bill as being unconstitutional and refused to impose the new federal guidelines. Part of their defense was that the county sheriff was the supreme law enforcement officer over their county and that the federal government could not supersede their legal authority.
In the court’s decision, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote:
“... The great innovation of this design was that ‘our citizens would have two political capacities, one state and one federal, each protected from incursion by the other’”–“a legal system unprecedented in form and design, establishing two orders of government, each with its own direct relationship, its own privity, its own set of mutual rights and obligations to the people who sustain it and are governed by it.”(P.920)
Justice Scalia then quoted the man considered to be the Father of the US Constitution, President James Madison, when he wrote in the decision:
“[T]he local or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the supremacy, no more subject, within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere.” The Federalist, No. 39 at 245.
Scalia then referred to Gregory, 501 US at 458 when he wrote:
“This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution’s structural protections of liberty:‘Just as the separation and independence of the coordinate branches of the Federal Government serve to prevent the accumulation of excessive power in any one branch, a healthy balance of power between the States and the Federal Government will reduce the risk of tyranny and abuse from either front.’...”
Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”(P. 922).
In other words, the county sheriff is the highest governmental authority in his county and he does not have to bow to the tyranny of the federal government if he deems such actions to be unconstitutional or unlawful. In essence, the county sheriff has more legal authority within his county than the governor or the state or even the president of the United States.
Today, former Sheriff Richard Mack works with a number of county sheriffs throughout the county, helping them understand the extent of their authority and how they can legally defy the federal government. I would highly recommend that you contact your county sheriff and see if he/she is aware of their powers and duties. If not, get them in contact with Mack and urge your county sheriff to stand up against upcoming unconstitutional gun laws that the liberals are going to try to impose on us.
CLICK ON THE LINK:http://rightmarch.com/201 3/01/county-sheriffs-can-block -federal-gun-control/

Whack-jobs like you are EXACTLY why we need to ban assault weapons.
People like you are not emotionally equipped to own dangerous, high capacity weapons; you're just too excitable.

[Mitt the Nitwit R-Money]

I bet Mitt loves to shoot automatic assault weapons

[obarna vomit]

Mitt Romney makes me hard.

[The Democrat]

Of course I will vote, Republican

[Tan]

Should you enjoy reading your university texts?

[Sam]

Don't forget to over saturate salt
on all the roads !!!!!

[Hingle McCringleberry]

Sam wrote:

Don't forget to over saturate salt
on all the roads !!!!!

The civil war is over, you can go home now to your cornpone, cracker.

[Hingle McCringleberry]

Tan wrote:

Should you enjoy reading your university texts?

Why? So you can steal some more American ingenuity? Build yo own damn stuff, yo own damn self!

[Hingle McCringleberry]

The Democrat wrote:

Of course I will vote, Republican

Yeah , you a democrat, that's why you lying!