New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

Created by Top Mod2 on Sep 13, 2010

3,715 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Jack Webb

Houston, TX

#13358 Oct 22, 2012
Pertinent Questions wrote:
Why did Paul Ryan serve 3 years in the state penitentiary in the early '90s on a rape conviction for forcibly raping his neighbor's 16-year old daughter ?
Why was Paul Ryan subsequently re-arrested for violation of parole in 1998 on a child pornography charge ?
Why is Paul Ryan on a lifetime sexual predator watch list in the state of Ohio ?
These are all pertinent questions we must all ask ourselves.
Reported.
Barak Hussein

New Hartford, NY

#13359 Oct 22, 2012
Why is Obama letting terroists into the White House?

Among the visitors were officials representing groups which have:
Been designated by the Department of Justice as unindicted co-conspirators in terrorist trials; Extolled Islamic terrorist groups including Hamas and Hizballah;
Obstructed terrorist investigations by instructing their followers not to cooperate with law enforcement;
Promoted the incendiary conspiratorial allegation that the United States is engaged in a "war against Islam" a leading tool in recruiting Muslims to carry out acts of terror;
Repeatedly claimed that many of the Islamic terrorists convicted since 9-11 were framed by the U.S government as part of an anti-Muslim profiling campaign.

Individuals from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) visited the White House at least 20 times starting in 2009. In 2008, CAIR was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist money laundering case in U.S. history the trial of the Holy Land Foundation in which five HLF officials were convicted of funneling money to Hamas.
Whining Repuke

Corinth, NY

#13360 Oct 22, 2012
Jack Webb wrote:
<quoted text>
As your lawyer, I must advise you that false injurious statements such as yours above are punishable by harsh civil penalties in the State of New York. Mr Romney and/or his Campaign are entitled to sue you and Topix for general damages and special damages.
I advise you to retract these falseaccusations and issue an apology.
Topix is advised to ban you from the site for violation of their TOS, lest they also be liable for damages by propagating your slanderous statements.
I wouldn't hold my breath too long if I were you.....
really

Los Angeles, CA

#13361 Oct 22, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
There really is no point in trying to have an intelligent conversation about fiscal policy with someone who insists on propagandizing federal government REVENUE and federal government OUTLAYS (i.e., spending) as somehow synonymous.
They're not.
Nor is a reduction in federal tax RATES synonymous with a reduction in federal tax REVENUE, as you insist on propagandizing. A reduction in tax rates that spurs increased growth in economic activity can result in INCREASED federal tax REVENUE.
But playing along with your bullsh!t partisan Fedzilla propaganda line just for the purposes of argument, the fundamental fact is that reductions in federal REVENUE are only that - in no way do they represent an increase in federal spending OUTLAY or increased COST to the federal government.
Ergo - the "$7 trillion of spending increases" you continue to falsely claim is Romney's plan is total bullsh!t - a blatant lie.
Lying partisan hack - begone.
First off to say that federal tax revenue does not effect the deficit, you're beyond insane. That is complete bullshit if you think that.

Second, playing with your make believe world where taking in less amount of revenue in any way doesn't impact the deficit. So your argument is "Oh well you see when you remove the 5 trillion less we will be making from taxes, he only wants to run in the red by 2 trillion more. Thats way less than obama wanting to...oh whats that...he is making 3 trillion in spending cuts....and raising 1 trillion in revenue?..."

You don't think your arguments through much do you...
whining Repukes

Corinth, NY

#13362 Oct 22, 2012
Jack Webb wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported.
WoW...doya think they'll take my lolipops ?
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#13363 Oct 22, 2012
Whining Repuke wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL......Sorry, Jethro......wrong end of Sacandaga Lake !
Don't know why topix lists me as Gloversville, nor do I care....
But DO note I live in one of the HEALTHIEST counties in the state:
http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/morning_cal...
Also one with the lowest unemployment rates in the state :
http://blog.timesunion.com/saratogaseen/unemp...
One of the "Super coolest" resort destinations in the world :
http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Sarat...
http://www.saratoga.com/whatsnew/2012/10/sara...
Need I go on, redneck ?
Saratoga must be very proud of you.
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#13364 Oct 22, 2012
really wrote:
<quoted text>
First off to say that federal tax revenue does not effect the deficit, you're beyond insane. That is complete bullshit if you think that.
You must have me confused with someone else.

I've said nothing about the "deficit."

I want federal SPENDING cut back to its historically sustainable level of 18% of GDP or less.

YOU'RE the one who's arguing with yourself about the "deficit." include me out - not interested.
really wrote:
<quoted text>
Second, playing with your make believe world where taking in less amount of revenue in any way doesn't impact the deficit. So your argument is "Oh well you see when you remove the 5 trillion less we will be making from taxes, he only wants to run in the red by 2 trillion more. Thats way less than obama wanting to...oh whats that...he is making 3 trillion in spending cuts....and raising 1 trillion in revenue?..."
You don't think your arguments through much do you...
Thank you for confirming here you are completely clueless about fiscal policy.

Dismissed.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#13365 Oct 22, 2012
Jack Webb wrote:
<quoted text>
Reported.
The truth is obama is a serial liar and so are you
Really

Burbank, CA

#13366 Oct 22, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
You must have me confused with someone else.
I've said nothing about the "deficit."
I want federal SPENDING cut back to its historically sustainable level of 18% of GDP or less.
YOU'RE the one who's arguing with yourself about the "deficit." include me out - not interested.
<quoted text>
Thank you for confirming here you are completely clueless about fiscal policy.
Dismissed.
Romney adding 2 trillion to spending removing 5 trillion from revenue

Obama cutting 3 trillion from spending adding 1 trillion to revenue.

Doesn't take a genius to figure that out. Quit being a partisan hack

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#13367 Oct 22, 2012
Big Bird wrote:
You can LIE all you want but you can't chanhe facts, obama came into office with a 450 billion dollar deficit, OBAMA added tge 1 trillion stimulus to that deficit. Obama is responsible for 6 trillion of deficit spending. Obama increased National debt 6 trillion. Obama promised to cut deficit in half but instead raised it by 300 percent. FACT
<quoted text>
Bird go back and learn the differance between DEBT and Deficit.
And can you PLEASE tell us where in H-ll you are getting these numbers from?
I think you are pulling them out of someplace where the sun doesn't shine.
Look here is just ONE site that can tell you that OBAMA has decreased the DEFICIT [ yes he did increase the bebt ]
http://home.adelphi.edu/sbloch/deficits.html
As you can see F/Y 2007/2008 the DEFICIT was 1Trillion 17 Billion 71 Mill.
2008/09 the last budget Bush signed into law, the DEFICIT was 1Trillion 885Billion 104 Mill.
09/10 OH LOOK it deficit goes down , the FIRST budget OBAMA signs is has lower spending in it than the last one G.W. Bush signed.
1 Trillion 651 Billion 794 Mill Down 233 Billion 310 mill.
F/Y 10/11 the Deficit was 1 Trillion 228 Billion 717 mill and that is down 423 Billion 077 mill
OH!! it went down again
lets look at 2011/12 the DEFICIT was 1 Trillion 224 Billion 790 mill
OH it went down again by only 3 Billion 927 mill But it did go down.
SO go back and find where you got your numbers from and let us know.
The Deficit in 07/08 was already over a TRILLION dollars and in 08/08 it was 1 Trillion, 885 Billion 104 million NOT 450 Billion [ you only wish it was 450 Billion that would have been about 1/4th of what it really was.]
Have a nice night
SOS

Buffalo, NY

#13368 Oct 22, 2012
Same old Spam by the drunken tbird. I bet he doesn't even remember posting it over a dozen times.

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#13369 Oct 22, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
There really is no point in trying to have an intelligent conversation about fiscal policy with someone who insists on propagandizing federal government REVENUE and federal government OUTLAYS (i.e., spending) as somehow synonymous.
They're not.
Nor is a reduction in federal tax RATES synonymous with a reduction in federal tax REVENUE, as you insist on propagandizing. A reduction in tax rates that spurs increased growth in economic activity can result in INCREASED federal tax REVENUE.
But playing along with your bullsh!t partisan Fedzilla propaganda line just for the purposes of argument, the fundamental fact is that reductions in federal REVENUE are only that - in no way do they represent an increase in federal spending OUTLAY or increased COST to the federal government.
Ergo - the "$7 trillion of spending increases" you continue to falsely claim is Romney's plan is total bullsh!t - a blatant lie.
Lying partisan hack - begone.
Teddy first of all didn't we try all this before?
Wasn't it called trickle down back when Reagan tried it?
And it didn't work then why do you think it will now?
NOW remember REAGAN had to increase taxes 11 times when he was in office after he did his big tax cut.
You keep on saying that you want spending back to the 18% of gdp rate,
Well as of now OBAMA has decreased the rate that spending was growing to a rate of about 4% over what G.W. Bush was spending and is trying to bring it down even more.
What happens when he brings it down to what Bush had are you still going to insist it go lower, you have to remember that there is an inflation factor that has to be factored in there.
in 2002-2005 Bush II had a spending rate of 18.9% GDP
in 2006 to 2009 it was 13.3% of gdp and if Obama increased it at a rate of 4.1% you are below the 18% you talk about.
The Debt has had an avg. annual increase of 13.8% under Obama \.
It was 10.8% under Carter
23.6% under Reagan
13.9 % under Bush I
4.4% under Clinton
11.1% under Bush II
So Obama is right in the area of Reagan and Bush I and not too far ahead of Bush II
Have a nice night

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#13370 Oct 22, 2012
Retard Repukes wrote:
<quoted text>
"lying skunk"
You'll note....I post UNBIASED PROOF of what I have to say...
You just run your mouth cuz you like to hear yourself blat.
"who's your parole officer? I think you need a visit"
Well, why don't YOU be my "parole officer" ? You know where I live.....or are you the REAL "yellowbelly" on this forum ?
Tell ya what.....I'll look for the shuffling inbred orangutan with the "vote romney" cap !
Then we'll dance.
I suffer fools gladly
really

Burbank, CA

#13371 Oct 22, 2012
Governer Romneys foreign policy "I agree with pretty much everything the president has done..."
yeah really

Buffalo, NY

#13372 Oct 22, 2012
Yes, the US Marines and Army do use bayonets and in the Afghan war our Special Forces did use horses with the Northern Alliance to defeat the Taliban. Obama's remarks were rude and condesending.

A panel on MSNBC is no Republicans or 6 Democrats for every Republican.
fairness

Massena, NY

#13374 Oct 22, 2012
News Flash:This just in Pres. Obama,opened a can of whup ass on Rmoney,earlier tonight.
fairness

Massena, NY

#13375 Oct 22, 2012
tbird19482 wrote:
<quoted text>Teddy first of all didn't we try all this before?
Wasn't it called trickle down back when Reagan tried it?
And it didn't work then why do you think it will now?
NOW remember REAGAN had to increase taxes 11 times when he was in office after he did his big tax cut.
You keep on saying that you want spending back to the 18% of gdp rate,
Well as of now OBAMA has decreased the rate that spending was growing to a rate of about 4% over what G.W. Bush was spending and is trying to bring it down even more.
What happens when he brings it down to what Bush had are you still going to insist it go lower, you have to remember that there is an inflation factor that has to be factored in there.
in 2002-2005 Bush II had a spending rate of 18.9% GDP
in 2006 to 2009 it was 13.3% of gdp and if Obama increased it at a rate of 4.1% you are below the 18% you talk about.
The Debt has had an avg. annual increase of 13.8% under Obama \.
It was 10.8% under Carter
23.6% under Reagan
13.9 % under Bush I
4.4% under Clinton
11.1% under Bush II
So Obama is right in the area of Reagan and Bush I and not too far ahead of Bush II
Have a nice night
Careful tbird,they detest facts and anyone disagreeing with their opinions,which are set in concrete.
ballsacksoup

New York, NY

#13376 Oct 22, 2012
All you libs will drink the juices of my scrotum in November. Get a job, or move over, slugs.
fairness

Massena, NY

#13378 Oct 22, 2012
Whining Repuke wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL......Sorry, Jethro......wrong end of Sacandaga Lake !
Don't know why topix lists me as Gloversville, nor do I care....
But DO note I live in one of the HEALTHIEST counties in the state:
http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/morning_cal...
Also one with the lowest unemployment rates in the state :
http://blog.timesunion.com/saratogaseen/unemp...
One of the "Super coolest" resort destinations in the world :
http://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Sarat...
http://www.saratoga.com/whatsnew/2012/10/sara...
Need I go on, redneck ?
Anyone praising the economic prowess of Mississippi,isn't to be taking seriously.It's been the poorest state in the union for years.It always ranks dead last in education(which is quite important to companies,looking to relocate).It is no.1 in obesity and diabetes,because poverty forces the people to have poor diets.It is also no.1 in teenage pregnancy,which is why it just started sex education in its' schools.As for Arkansas,there are tons of places with excellent duck hunting,NNY,being a prime example.As they say in Arkansas,thank god for Miss.,because they are 49th in educ. and Miss. is 50th.
really

Burbank, CA

#13379 Oct 22, 2012
yeah really wrote:
Yes, the US Marines and Army do use bayonets and in the Afghan war our Special Forces did use horses with the Northern Alliance to defeat the Taliban. Obama's remarks were rude and condesending.
A panel on MSNBC is no Republicans or 6 Democrats for every Republican.
He said fewer not none

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Melville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why is Lindenhurst such a Ghetto? (Mar '10) 13 hr Savagecatwomen 683
Cutting of pastor's role called 'vindictive' (Oct '08) Sat Bruser 7,956
Arrest Report: DWI, Criminal Possession (Nov '11) Sat Busted 17
Swift Named Principal at Our Lady of Lourdes (Aug '09) Fri Bruser 2,391
women would you castrate you husbands? Fri della 3
Cops: Office manager billed employer for fake s... (Jan '08) Thu anon 28
Review: I Love Kickboxing - Hicksville (Feb '14) Thu Jlevine 10

Winter Storm Watch for Suffolk County was issued at February 01 at 9:31AM EST

Melville News Video

Melville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Melville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:24 am PST

Yahoo! Sports11:24AM
New Browns OC unfazed by QB uncertainty
Bleacher Report11:36 AM
Ex-QB: Equipment Staff Fixes Brady's Balls
Bleacher Report 7:29 PM
How the Jets Can Make Most of Each Draft Pick
Bleacher Report 8:01 PM
5 2nd Round Prospects Jets Should Target
NBC Sports 7:09 AM
Perry Fewell to interview for position coach job with 49ers