Nothing in your post here causes me to revise my previous assessment of your posts as rubbish.<quoted text>
The guy is full of sh*t, and you know it. First, we have to assume that this person or person was a professional, right? Ameteurs don't crack safes. Now, in order to break into the safe, the perps had to know it was there, because they had to bring specialized tools to get into it. No professional breaks into a house on the off chance that there's a safe...to much risk.
So, we can assume one of the following:
1. No guns ever existed, so there was no safe broken into
2. Guns were stolen, but it was a setup: the safe was left open for the "theives"...they get the guns, and the owner puts in a big claim with the insurance company.
3. Small-time crooks breaking into a private residence just happened to have the tools and knowledge necessary to break into a locked gun-safe and get away without making enough noise to alert the neighbors.
You decide...bu11shit or not!
Your post attempting Alinskyite ridicule of the obviously factual truth that thieves routinely defeat all levels of security to steal firearms, just like jewelry, in residential burglaries was immediately shown to be rank horsedung. A Google search on "guns stolen in burglary" returns 300,000 additional hits - you would do well to peruse them before posting again on this matter.
That you persist in even trying to ridicule this indisputable fact simply adds to the weight of proof showing you to be a mindless partisan stooge, an anti-gun extremist idealogue that has no credibility whatsoever on this issue.
You're posting rubbish, best ignored.