Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#285 Feb 7, 2013
WI Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, you can't compromise standards when you don't have any to begin with.
The sscc has been in the same place for 10 years. Knowing that you're still going to sit there and try to portray this as anything but a long term lease? Can you say facade?
BTW, they couldn't have found a better puppet, you must be so proud.
The lease is not for more than 5 years. It is one or two years with options. That is a fact. Anything more than that goes to a vote. You have no argument. You can think I am a puppet all you want. Fact is I voiced concern about it only being a short term lease and where will the school go after the 5 years is up and they need to reopen Westbrook. Because the fact is I think they will need to reopen Westbrook.....
WI Resident

West Islip, NY

#286 Feb 7, 2013
Jessica Horvath wrote:
<quoted text>
And where does your all encompassing knowledge come from? Do you have kids in preschool? Do you have kids at South Shore? You know nothing except how to act like a preteen bully. God forbid you had to say any of this to my face. You are too much of a coward to open your mouth and say anything to anyone. You can hate me all you want but at least I can tell it like it is in person.
I know, I know, it's the already old and tired "you are a cyber bully" routine. Do you even hear yourself? I think it's safe to say that you are the most critical, the most intolerant, the most nasty piece of work around. You comment on everything, giving your two cents worth, and you try to come off as the moral voice of reason. Except when you do that, you end up looking like a huge hypocrite to everyone who reads your posts.

You want it both ways, but guess what, not everyone is going to fall for your slick style of flipping and flopping the way you do.

Face it, you are the only person that HAS TO (because you can't help yourself) stand on your soap box and pretend to be the all knowing Jessica. You claimed that there was no preschool going into Westbrook exactly a year ago, and low and behold, looks like you were wrong. In fact, the very school that you say your own children attend is going there. Wow...
WI Resident

West Islip, NY

#287 Feb 7, 2013
Jessica Horvath wrote:
<quoted text>
The lease is not for more than 5 years. It is one or two years with options. That is a fact. Anything more than that goes to a vote. You have no argument. You can think I am a puppet all you want. Fact is I voiced concern about it only being a short term lease and where will the school go after the 5 years is up and they need to reopen Westbrook. Because the fact is I think they will need to reopen Westbrook.....
You're not getting it. You can use whatever terminology you like, another reason why you're GROSS. It must be the shyster in you.
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#288 Feb 7, 2013
WI Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
I know, I know, it's the already old and tired "you are a cyber bully" routine. Do you even hear yourself? I think it's safe to say that you are the most critical, the most intolerant, the most nasty piece of work around. You comment on everything, giving your two cents worth, and you try to come off as the moral voice of reason. Except when you do that, you end up looking like a huge hypocrite to everyone who reads your posts.
You want it both ways, but guess what, not everyone is going to fall for your slick style of flipping and flopping the way you do.
Face it, you are the only person that HAS TO (because you can't help yourself) stand on your soap box and pretend to be the all knowing Jessica. You claimed that there was no preschool going into Westbrook exactly a year ago, and low and behold, looks like you were wrong. In fact, the very school that you say your own children attend is going there. Wow...
A year ago THERE WASNT a preschool going into Westbrook. There also wasnt a boxing school or a charter school going into Kirdahy. Now there is. I never pretended to be all knowing. If I have a question I ask it. I dont just sit there and speculate and gossip which you seem to be a champ at. Keep up the good work you will go far.
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#289 Feb 7, 2013
WI Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
You're not getting it. You can use whatever terminology you like, another reason why you're GROSS. It must be the shyster in you.
No you are not getting it. Why dont you call someone who knows the deal AND ASK WHAT IS HAPPENING instead of fighting with me? You dont even care what happens, all you want to do is gossip and fight and cause problems. Why dont you go out and do some research, or are you too lazy? It is more fun to gossip and speculate over coffee or wine or at the busstop??

Find out some actual information and then come back. You dont even know what you are talking about.
Sick of jessica

Bronx, NY

#290 Feb 7, 2013
Jessica Horvath wrote:
Yes but there IS no pecuniary interest.
Maybe she should just abstain because of her personal relationship with Helene.....Although again, what does she stand to gain personally from voting in this transaction?
They aren't going to vote in front of us anyway. You will just hear the results at the next meeting.
Jessica, you are a dolt who has very bad reading comprehension skills. First of all, you do not know for sure annmarie does not have a pecuniary interest in this deal. Second, what the other poster is saying is that you only have to recuse yourself from the vote if you have a pecuniary interest in what is being voted on. The fact that she recused herself is because she DOES have a pecuniary interest. If she didnt, she wouldnt have to recuse herself. Get it? My god, the law schools graduate idiots.
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#291 Feb 7, 2013
Sick of jessica wrote:
<quoted text>
Jessica, you are a dolt who has very bad reading comprehension skills. First of all, you do not know for sure annmarie does not have a pecuniary interest in this deal. Second, what the other poster is saying is that you only have to recuse yourself from the vote if you have a pecuniary interest in what is being voted on. The fact that she recused herself is because she DOES have a pecuniary interest. If she didnt, she wouldnt have to recuse herself. Get it? My god, the law schools graduate idiots.
how do you know she recused herself? Were you at the vote?

If she did she probably did it just as she recused herself for the vote for Jamie Winkler to handle the renting of the buildings - because she didnt want to hear all the crap that comes with having a friend who happens to be a business owner and productive member of this community who is trying to earn a living. She is doing the right thing if she did in fact recuse herself yet you all are still complaining.

If you are so sick of me, STOP READING.
crazy in WI

West Babylon, NY

#292 Feb 8, 2013
Does anyone feel bad for Jessica other half? Could you imagine what is like to live with her. awwwwww I just got chills.
kriistina delaney

Perkiomenville, PA

#293 Feb 8, 2013
Hey Jess..why put yourself through all the negative comments. You're better off not commenting on here anymore.
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#294 Feb 8, 2013
PS I Love You.
mommy and daddy know best

West Islip, NY

#295 Feb 8, 2013
you know why everything that goes on in west islip turns into the jessica horvath show? because we allow it to. when she's not getting enough attention in her daily life she'll seek attention online whether it's positive or negative she just needs her attention fix from all of us. back to the subject: renting westbrook and kirdahy for $10 a square foot inclusive of everything except cable tv is not making money for our town any way you work the numbers. lets not leave bridges out of this, who owns bridges? It's not st peters by the sea reopening under another name. st peters by the sea is closing due to poor enrollment. only thing st peters by the sea has to do w/bridges is that st peters headmaster will now be working at bridges. who owns bridges?
Quacker Jax

West Babylon, NY

#296 Feb 8, 2013
Jessica is one cool chick. She is one of the few people with ballz to post who isnt a pansy assssse phoney baloney. She is the Queeen of the posting scene.
Ananamouse

West Islip, NY

#297 Feb 9, 2013
Like you Quacker Jax?
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#298 Feb 9, 2013
crazy in WI wrote:
Does anyone feel bad for Jessica other half? Could you imagine what is like to live with her. awwwwww I just got chills.
yeah he has it rough. home cooked meals every night and he got to sleep in while I started shoveling this morning.....poor guy.....
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#299 Feb 9, 2013
kriistina delaney wrote:
Hey Jess..why put yourself through all the negative comments. You're better off not commenting on here anymore.
they don't get me down no worries....the people I want to know me know me, I don't give a crap about these idiots. they have to live with themselves, God help them....love u Kristina :)
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#300 Feb 9, 2013
mommy and daddy know best wrote:
you know why everything that goes on in west islip turns into the jessica horvath show? because we allow it to. when she's not getting enough attention in her daily life she'll seek attention online whether it's positive or negative she just needs her attention fix from all of us. back to the subject: renting westbrook and kirdahy for $10 a square foot inclusive of everything except cable tv is not making money for our town any way you work the numbers. lets not leave bridges out of this, who owns bridges? It's not st peters by the sea reopening under another name. st peters by the sea is closing due to poor enrollment. only thing st peters by the sea has to do w/bridges is that st peters headmaster will now be working at bridges. who owns bridges?
you are asking the same thing I asked but yet you had to get the dig on me in. what is your problem? I don't need attention from you petty judgmental nasty people. you people like to turn it into the Jessica show, why don't you all stick to the issues at hand and refrain from personal attacks? then it will only be the west islip show...
Mr Grnspn

West Islip, NY

#301 Feb 9, 2013
Jessica Horvath wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually Genius, I dont run around telling everyone that. I said it one time and all you people ran with it. Next, Mr. Grnspn basically agreed with what I said.
PS I love you day is tomorrow, maybe you people can give it a rest for a day, get out from behind your computer screen and go do something nice for a change.
Mrs Horvath, with all due respect my rebuttal doesn't agree with your view, it's in direct contrast to your view of why Mrs La Rosa would recuse herself from voting on the Southshore preschool lease. By recusing herself from said vote Mrs. La Rosa IS acknowledging a direct personal or pecuniary interest with Southshore Preschool. Mrs. La Rosa would have been adivsed by legal councel to recuse herself from the vote. The action of her recusal lays groundwork for a defense should the executed lease with Southshore preschool become a catalyst for legal action against Mrs. La Rosa by other groups or entities.
Mr Grnspn

West Islip, NY

#302 Feb 9, 2013
pardon me. An error of spelling councel instead of counsel.
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#303 Feb 9, 2013
Mr Grnspn wrote:
<quoted text>
Mrs Horvath, with all due respect my rebuttal doesn't agree with your view, it's in direct contrast to your view of why Mrs La Rosa would recuse herself from voting on the Southshore preschool lease. By recusing herself from said vote Mrs. La Rosa IS acknowledging a direct personal or pecuniary interest with Southshore Preschool. Mrs. La Rosa would have been adivsed by legal councel to recuse herself from the vote. The action of her recusal lays groundwork for a defense should the executed lease with Southshore preschool become a catalyst for legal action against Mrs. La Rosa by other groups or entities.
first you can say you disagree with me just because you don't like me but the fact is that she probably revised herself from the vote because of her personal relationship with Helene just as she revised herself from the.vote for Jamie Winkler to handle the real estate transaction. did you happen to be at the vote? how do you even know what you are claiming? again she probably revised herself for personal reasons not pecuniary interests. there is a difference
Jessica Horvath

Brentwood, NY

#304 Feb 9, 2013
recused not revised

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Melville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
irish mob (Oct '13) 4 hr ClipperHatBoy 31
Cutting of pastor's role called 'vindictive' (Oct '08) 11 hr Bruser 7,937
Dogwood la 23 hr Sambee 1
What happened to RObert MAyer? (Aug '13) Tue Sambee 2,046
Swift Named Principal at Our Lady of Lourdes (Aug '09) Dec 23 Bruser 2,365
Review: Bt Orthotic Labs Inc (Oct '08) Dec 22 James 6
6 arrested after trio caught carrying safe in D... (May '09) Dec 9 StepPredator 31

Melville News Video

Melville Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Melville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Melville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Melville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:41 am PST

NBC Sports 4:41AM
Rex Ryan thinks Aaron Donald can't hold Sheldon Richardson's jock
NFL 7:57 AM
Geno Smith: I see myself as Jets' QB for a long time
NBC Sports 8:18 AM
Geno Smith: I'm part of the problem, I want to be part of the solution
Bleacher Report 4:00 PM
Beckham Definition of Special Talent
Bleacher Report 5:30 PM
Philadelphia Eagles vs. New York Giants: Complete Week 17 Preview for New York