Posted in the McKee Forum
#1 May 4, 2012
WHAT KIND OF COUNTY LETS DRUG SELLERS SELL THEM RIGHT WITH IN 20 MINUTES FROM LIVING CLOSE TO THE SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY. THEY LET THEM SELL THEM AND WONT STOP THEM. TIM FEE IS GONE LORD HELP THE COUNTY!!!!!!!!!!
#3 May 5, 2012
Ha ha,Who's selling it you? Because 20 minutes from the sheriff's, house and you could be in berea. Smart!
#4 May 5, 2012
same kind of county that puts up with an "Innocent" Murderer going door to door asking for votes for his wife that orginally stole him from his first wife and children.
#5 May 6, 2012
Jerry is a nasty pervert, he did his wife Glenna bad. Teresa was a Truett at the time , she took him serious and fell for him. Glenna found out, took the 2 kids and left Jerrry. She was heartbroken and devasted. Jackson county people are smarter and wiser than what you think. They will not vote for a home wrecker and someone that has been accused of murder and sexual harrassment. Jackson County will take a stand.
#6 May 6, 2012
she upgraded from eugene truett
#7 May 6, 2012
Jerry and Glenna had already went their seperate ways and their sons were grown when Jerry began talking with Teresa. Yes, Jerry was accused of murder but he was found not guilty in our court system. Common knowledge should tell each of us there were 3 people involved in the murder of Audrey and Jerry Dean WAS NOT one of the 3. Please ask Audreys' loved ones that were left to grieve her passing and hear what they have to say about it. I will never forget how nice Teresa was each time I saw her while she worked as Deputy Court Clerk for Bobby in the old court house for many years and how nice she was to everyone and she didn't have good and bad days, she was nice always. It's not her husband running for office but if it was, I would have no problem with it. We all know with the technology out there today it is next to impossible to do anything without being convicted and the case against Jerry was fought to the fullest extent and there just wasn't any evidence there for the Jurors. Had either of the 3 mentioned before been tried, Yes, there would have been a conviction. I still have the V.C.R. recorded tapes and guilty is all over their testimonies and actions.
#8 May 6, 2012
Jerry had the Motive- He was the only one being sued for Milllions of Dollars by Audrey Oppurtunity-Jerry had the opportunity-after all his adoring wife Teresa was having a jewelry party the next house over from Audreys on the same night she was murdered shot in cold blood. If Jerry was so innocent-why did he and Teresa run from the police??? Then Why did he and Teresa return to Jackson COunty then refused to come out of his home hours??? He is guilty and will rot in hell for killing her. You are right about one thing...ask Audrey's family- except her now deseased mom. They all knew who the killer was and he is now knocking on doors asking for votes for his wife. And you are so wrong-she did have an affair with Jerry while he was still married to Glenna. What is the word for that?? Homewrecker ?? Whore?? Nice my rump!! Wolf in sheeps clothing!!
#9 May 7, 2012
I think ghost should stay ghost and the wife is not responsible for what the husband might or might not have done.
I was in the office the day Jerry jumped Audry for taking the auto-title paperwork personally to her daddy instead of daddy coming into the office I heard him tell her daddy was no different than the rest of the county and she wasn't going to do him any special favors and daddy could stand in line like everyone else.
I can tell you this much. She was PO'd to the max and said she would get even with him and there was nothing said about any kind of sexual harassment at the time she later alleged.
(after all didn't she have a girlfriend at the time and if so wouldn't that indicate she no longer found men attractive in a sexual fashion?)
Jerry was a little hot over what she had done, but he did keep his temper under control and didn't curse or yell although he was quite adamant that she was not to take any paperwork out of the office again for any reason. This verbal confrontation took place in the book room while I was doing a title search on some property I was interested in.
Now you all can call me a liar if you want and that is OK but I do know about that one instance and can stand on a polygraph with it.
Before anyone asks I don't know either one of them personally or their families.
I don't know who shot Audry and I don't care as no one else knows either for a fact. No one saw it happen. Jerry had his day in court and the jury set him free.
If he did it God will know and God won't make a mistake.
I still say follow the money and who got the insurance and got caught with it in the trunk when their name wasn't on the policy, and who split it with who when they didn't have to?
Jerry wouldn't have been out a dime in the lawsuit. The county would have, but not Jerry...so much for that conspiracy.
How would you like it if everyone spit on you because your wife or brother or some other relative did something wrong? Bet you wouldn't.
Jerry's wife is no more responsible for what Jerry might have done as you are for what your spouse might do or have done.
#10 May 7, 2012
Now for the gossip about not coming out of the house for hours:
During this third interrogation with police, David Dean's cell phone rang and the caller I.D. revealed the phone number of his father. He was instructed by investigators not to answer the call, but a short time later, Jerry Dean showed up at his son's house, at which time police arrested him for the murder of Audrey Marcum.
Doesn't sound like Jerry barricaded himself anywhere.
That's the problem with this topix -- everyone wants to put out gossip and what they think they know. In reality 99% of it is pure bull-mookey.
#11 May 7, 2012
Duke, you are on track. Don't these people wonder about the 1 of the 3 that passed away from drugs, the 2nd. one that continues his drugs and the 3rd. that stays drunk out of his mind. Why? Because they can't deal with what they did. Audrey didn't want to sue anyone but she was talked in to it by another one that was so money hungry that he would do anything for a dime and he has since passed. I can also tell people too that Jerry doesn't need drugs or alcohol to sooth his soul as he knows he can deal with life without it. I also liked the text you did about what you saw on Indian Creek. Duke, the law doesn't want to know about what you or anyone else has to say because it would now make them look so bad. I would bet my heels they knew what happened as I know and you seem to know more than you care to admit and this, I can understand. Continue to text as I, for one, enjoy reading the search for the truth you put out here for us to read. It is better than Grannys' front porch articles and they aren't bad by no means. Back to the subject, the law officers doing the investigating didn't want to hear what anyone had to say but the merchant and boy! did he sale them what he wanted them to know because he wasn't a dummie and he knew they weren't smart enough to do their own investigative work and this enabled him to allow 3 to get off the hook and more likely than not, himself too. Keep up the truth Duke!
#12 May 7, 2012
Something to consider: if he was wicked badddddd, she's probably grateful to be rid of him.
#13 May 7, 2012
DS, you are full of BS.
#14 May 7, 2012
I soooo appreciate that you used "EVERYONE", revealing that you include yourself. So, thank you, Duke.
#15 May 7, 2012
I have finally decided who I am voting for. I think Duke Snider is a blubbering idiot who thinks he is very intelligent. So since he is obviously for Teresa & Jeryy Dean, then I am voting for Doris Ward.
#16 May 7, 2012
Good for you. Glad I was able to help you make up your feeble mind. First off I am not for Jerry or Teresa Dean. In fact, I haven't decided who I might vote for. Apparently, you lack the IQ to gather what I wrote into logical thought.
I will simplify it for you.
I SAID MRS. DEAN IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT HER HUSBAND MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT HAVE DONE ANY MORE THAN YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT SOMEONE IN YOUR FAMILY MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT HAVE DONE.
Now, can you understand that or is your cranium still too far up your rectum.
The rest of the comments are directly related to events I have first hand knowledge of including what I think was tampered evidence that was first seen on Indian Creek, called in by me, and magically moved to someplace else.
When I called it in I told the Sheriff's office to the effect, "I don't know if the floating rifle stock in the creek is from the weapon used to kill the girl the other day but it appears to have have a string and weight tied to it keeping it in one place."
I further stated that if it is, then it was just put there sometime during the day because it wasn't there that morning and boots were still dry.
It had rained pretty darn good for a day or so before I saw it.
Later I asked the sheriff what happened to it when I saw him in the old court house and he mumbled something to the effect that it hadn't turned out to what they thought.
Well shuck-darn if a few days after I called it in they magically found what looked like the same stock floating in apparently another creek along with boots that looked just like the ones I saw sitting neatly along the road side-by-side like someone had just set them out.
Now you can all continue to tell me how full of it I am, but I said it all along I can pass a polygraph on what I saw lets see everyone else involved do the same....
Now you can put that in your harry pipe and smoke on it all you wish.
I hadn't been in this county all that long at the time and I sure as heck don't know any of the families involved and I have no reason to tell such a whopper.
It is my belief the evidence was planted and moved and planted again.
Now what are the odds of boots and a gun stock in a creek appearing in two different places within a day or so of each other if there wasn't some monkey shine involved?
If I wanted to go down fantasy lane I could ask, how do you know that there wasn't a county wide conspiracy in which the evidence was tampered with enough to cause doubt so Jerry could walk and the county didn't have to pay the bill? Maybe the prosecutor intentionally flubbed the case...Maybe they didn't expect someone to see the stuff before it became magically found? Maybe...Maybe... Maybe....
Now that is a conspiracy right in keeping with the way a lot of things seem to get done around here isn't it?....lol
Now back to reality. I don't know who shot who. YOU DO NOT EITHER. You may believe Jerry did and he might have. The jury said he was innocent. At this point I would say let God be the final judge.
I would not vote for Jerry. But I would not hold what Jerry might have done against his wife.
Now what makes you think Doris is entitled to job, other than she wants it?
Sounds to me you had your feeble mind made up already. What is she? Your cousin or some other relative?
It's all nepotism in this county anyhow.
#17 May 7, 2012
Unfortunately, I do have first hand knowledge of some of the events so I am not included in the gossip section unlike you who can devine the truth from a hundred miles away.
Did your doctors change your medications?
#18 May 7, 2012
BS? I take it you mean Brilliant Soliloquies! Thanks! I enjoy a good compliment every once in awhile.
#19 May 7, 2012
hello there d*ck rider,oops,I mean duke snider
#20 May 7, 2012
Obviously not using same meds as you, but thank you for the accusation: it means I must be doing something right.
#21 May 7, 2012
...I'm voting for Doris that way I won't have to worry what Jerry done & if Tereasa knowed about it.
Add your comments below
|mormons mormons mormons (Jun '15)||1 hr||Laughing||20|
|Add a Word / Drop a Word (Aug '10)||4 hr||Doug77||4,544|
|Jackson County OB GYN video||5 hr||vickers||2|
|brandon davidson||16 hr||donna||8|
|Six Letter Word Game (Jun '09)||Mon||Mutant-cucumber||3,526|
|brandon johnson (Aug '12)||Mon||2letuno||3|
|Nicole Bowling||Jan 14||David Anderson||1|
Find what you want!
Search McKee Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC