As a matter of fact, they did say the light cigarettes were safer. They were marketed specifically to keep worried smokers smoking for longer. They also manipulated nicotine and other chemicals in cigarettes to make smoking more addictive. They manipulated advertising to get young people to smoke. They knew that cigarettes and second hand smoke were dangerous.I know I am crazy in this thought process but did the side of the pack of light cigarettes have a different warning label than the regular ones?
Kind of seems like 10,000 volts vs 50,000 volts. One is definitely lighter. If they were truly less tar & nicotine they were in fact "light" A milder flavor may also be considered "light". Did the tobacco companies ever say that the light cigarettes were safer?
These documents have been released in open court and are there for the public to see. There is a lot of damning evidence in those papers. Once you get deep enough in those papers you will begin to think that the tobacco companies have engaged in criminal activities too and that they are liable for damages. Why do you think jury after jury has found for the smoker? Why do you think the tobacco companies are paying out billions to the states?