Statistics Show Background Checks Are Effective

[new hammer time]

Randomthoughts wrote:

<quoted text>
HE IS VERY AWARE
thats why he is here struggling with his guilt.
Trying to convice YOU his problems are OURS .
Look at his screen Name
Where is MC hammer now LOL
BROKE or is he with Whitney ? who knows .
Throw the racism back at him...and he flys to pieces
THEY always do :)

don't get me started again on you.....
the comment about MC Hammer and Whittney is way out of line.

[new hammer time]

Randomthoughts wrote:

<quoted text>
You know who owns who ...
LOL
You have admitited it OVER AND OVER
now get to work .... boy ...words cut you to the ground..... stay behind that screen .
Where we can try to keep you safe.
I need you to stay safe, I cant affors to many more of your bills

obviously, you are struggling with some deep seated emotional entanglements.....never thought that a grown man would revert back to being so childish and immature.

[new hammer time]

gun nut wrote:

<quoted text>
go to a gun show. you will find out that they are done at the shows. so get your fact straight before you show the same ignorance as pelosie and obama. what we oppose is gun registration of any form. time and time again registration leads to confiscation. thus back ground checks only need to indicate an intent to purchase.

gun registration is less of a hassle than being forced to show a photo ID to vote. you gun loons are not prepared to argue that.

[new hammer time]

Randomthoughts wrote:

<quoted text>
I wonder why we never hear of a mass shooting at a gun show ?
where thousands of guns are everywhere !
But no guns allowed in LIBERAL EPIC FAIL CHICAGO
WE know why

the answer is rather simple....buyers, sellers, lookers are there for one purpose....and usually its not to gun ppl. down. chicago is gang warfare territory to see who is going to control the drug markets...plain and simple.

[new hammer time]

VN Vet wrote:

<quoted text>That is funny, because the best law would be to forbid blacks and all welfare people from owning weapons of any kind. That is what Obama wants, but with ALL law abiding folks thrown in to boot. His only reason is to enslave us all, not to help us. The constitution was created to protect us from tyrants like him, not for hunting. It's time to take our country back, protect your rights, all of them.

where were you arguments when reagan, bush1 and clinton helped to get assault weapons banned? my thought is that they were white and less likely be considered tyrants. oh how blind you ppl. are/

[Boodreau]

new hammer time wrote:

<quoted text>
the answer is rather simple....buyers, sellers, lookers are there for one purpose....and usually its not to gun ppl. down. chicago is gang warfare territory to see who is going to control the drug markets...plain and simple.

And who are in these gangs looking to imprison their people with addiction. Score one for the chimps

[new hammer time]

Boodreau wrote:

<quoted text>And who are in these gangs looking to imprison their people with addiction. Score one for the chimps

chimps don't score......whites bring the drugs in and supply the local clientele with guns.

[huck]

gun nut wrote:

<quoted text>
time and time again registration leads to confiscation

really?
which state?

[I Left Cville Socialism]

huck wrote:

<quoted text>
really?
which state?

You mean aside from Cuba, China, Russia, and most other totalitarian states?

let's see...New Zealand, 1921 the ownership of revolvers were allowed in the name of personal defense, 1970s this list was used to confiscate all revolvers.

Canada...registration list 1990s, old guns grandfathered in, but this list is used for the state to confiscate the guns upon the death of the holder with no compensation to the estate

1996 Australia used it's list of registered semiauto hunting rifles to confiscate all those weapons.

The UK government instituted handgun registration in 1921, and about every 10 years or so they further restrict what can be owned and use the registration rolls to collect what is illegal.

How about Chicago, put in registration of long guns, used that same registration to confiscate semiauto long guns in the early 1990s

What about California, couldn't make up it's mind if the SKS was covered or not (1989), decided AFTER the registration period was closed that they needed to be registered, declared a second 'grace period' for registration...then about 5 years ago they decided that those SKSs registered during the grace period were illegal because the grace period was illegal, and in certain cities and counties sent law enforcement to the listed addresses demanding surrender of the firearm. Because there is the legal option of removing the gun from the state of CA, and these officers had no warrants, smart gun owners turned them away with the claim 'I gave it to a relative in Oregon (or whatever)' but MANY were seized with no compensation.(Cities and counties later on offered compensation for anyone who had a receipt, but the police weren't giving out receipts, only a few people who demanded them had them and they were basically notes scribbled on whatever spare paper the officer had)

[sez you]

So we don't ask or demand the cops to do their jobs and people suffer the consequences in crime and violence and want guns guns guns thinking thats gunna save them. The cops get off scot free with their defenders saying that their no here to protect and serve. Bull.