Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27928 Apr 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure I remember the 1994 Fed Assault Weapons Ban. It's when I legally purchased my Colt AR-15 Assault Rifle. Unfortunately, I couldn't get the 100 round drum clip for it due to that unreasonable ban on high capacity clips. How am I supposed to protect my home or go hunting without my 100 round drum clip? How outrageous! Nice try trying to rewrite history but unfortunately for you, I'm a gun owner since I got my 410 when I was 9 and I remember you guys crying about them taking all our guns away back under Clinton. Did they? Did they take all your guns away or was it just more crybaby the sky is falling right wing garbage...again? How many times have you guys cried about them taking all the guns away? Now how many times have they done it? Only an inbred fool would think the Feds could possibly take away the hundreds of thousands of undocumented and legally owned firearms in this nation. That's where you guys come in...
Hell, half the reason the Tea Baggers get all bent out of shape when the Feds take down a Waco nut job is because they realize they might be next for all those toddlers they have locked up in their doomsday Bible bunkers. It's why they hoard guns and get paranoid of the government watching them all the time. Me personally do not care if the government watches me every second of the day. Wonder why it doesn't bother me in the least? I mean besides the fact that I am not a deviant or a criminal.
look how well Obama's community organizing in a gun free zone was worked.

murder capital of the world.

your rant is for your fellow drunken sheep.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27929 Apr 28, 2014
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
No whit- not a tittle or jot.
professor did spoons make you fat too?
Canton

Canton, OH

#27930 Apr 28, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Reagan admits he was Liberal Democrat New Dealer to the core and remember Reagan didnt change Liberalism Changed which is why he left the Democrat Party and didnt want to be in same company with Bill Ayers and the so called New Left Liberal Democrats.
Ronald Reagan on Franklin Roosevelt: The Significance of Style
K. Alan Snyder - 08/20/08
Reagan was a New Deal Democrat. He joked that he had probably become a Democrat by birth, given that his father, Jack, was so devoted to the Democratic Party. The younger Reagan cast his first presidential vote in 1932 for Franklin Roosevelt, and did so again in the succeeding three presidential contests. His faith in FDR remained undimmed even after World War II, when he called himself “a New Dealer to the core.” He summarized his views in this way:“I thought government could solve all our postwar problems just as it had ended the Depression and won the war. I didn’t trust big business. I thought government, not private companies, should own our big public utilities; if there wasn’t enough housing to shelter the American people, I thought government should build it; if we needed better medical care, the answer was socialized medicine.” When his brother, Moon, became a Republican and argued with his sibling, the younger Reagan concluded “he was just spouting Republican propaganda.”
http://www.firstprinciplesjournal.com/article...
Once again, this all explains why Reagan is such a cornerstone of rightwing Conservatives. Who gives a rat's @ss what a bunch of leftwing hippies were doing in the 60's at their college. Wonder what the right was up to when this great leftist student threat was destroying the fabric of America? Oh, that's right. They were busy shooting into crowds of unarmed American children up in Kent State. As far as my 410 shotgun being on the list of guns they wanted to ban in 1994...bullsh1t and you know it. All that came of that ban, and reasonably so, were restrictions on high capacity clips and a minor alteration to flash suppressors. I forget. Remind me what it says about 100 round drum clips and flash suppressors in the 2nd Amendment. Nothing? Yah...thought so. Go polish your guns, hound dog. You have talk. Now if only that talk matched up with the facts.
Canton

Canton, OH

#27931 Apr 28, 2014
If it wasn't for Liberal thinking, we'd all be sipping tea right now under the Union Jack. If it wasn't for Americans paying their taxes, the American Revolution would not have happened and our army would not have been funded. You know, the reason this nation exists to this day? Now blurt out some imaginary nonsense about the founders of this nation being like the Tea Party.
Canton

Canton, OH

#27932 Apr 28, 2014
Waaaah the mean old government it trying to take away my 50 caliber sniper rifle. The with the range that can hit over a mile away and can turn a person into a cloud of pink mist. I need that 50 caliber rifle to defend my family and to hunt...for bad guys and squirrels that are threatening me from over a mile away.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27933 Apr 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, this all explains why Reagan is such a cornerstone of rightwing Conservatives. Who gives a rat's @ss what a bunch of leftwing hippies were doing in the 60's at their college. Wonder what the right was up to when this great leftist student threat was destroying the fabric of America? Oh, that's right. They were busy shooting into crowds of unarmed American children up in Kent State. As far as my 410 shotgun being on the list of guns they wanted to ban in 1994...bullsh1t and you know it. All that came of that ban, and reasonably so, were restrictions on high capacity clips and a minor alteration to flash suppressors. I forget. Remind me what it says about 100 round drum clips and flash suppressors in the 2nd Amendment. Nothing? Yah...thought so. Go polish your guns, hound dog. You have talk. Now if only that talk matched up with the facts.
your 410 single shot is a kids gun, or tomato stake.

remind me how a flash suppressor is anything but directing flash from a bang.

your 410 with a flash suppressor makes it more dangerous?

and while you want magazine restrictions, normal people want criminals jailed.

PS: flash suppressors can reduce recoil significantly, and improve accuracy by limiting barrel harmonics.

now get back to your lego building.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#27934 Apr 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
professor did spoons make you fat too?
This is only funny if you know word whit means. And even then, only the littlest bit funny. A whit of wit, if you will.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27935 Apr 28, 2014
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
This is only funny if you know word whit means. And even then, only the littlest bit funny. A whit of wit, if you will.
you are only funny when visioning a cucumber as your mate.

otherwise complete disgust and utter stupidity prevails with each post you type.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27937 Apr 28, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
At first I thought he in fact meant "whit" but had just used it in one of his typically awkward sentences. But upon reading it again with extra effort exerted at trying to divine the context, he very well may have misspelled "wit."
Ahhh, the many mysteries that our dear Walter provides.
your only client chicken little is on the line.....want me to have the receptionist tell them to cluck off?
Canton

Canton, OH

#27938 Apr 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
your 410 single shot is a kids gun, or tomato stake.
remind me how a flash suppressor is anything but directing flash from a bang.
your 410 with a flash suppressor makes it more dangerous?
and while you want magazine restrictions, normal people want criminals jailed.
PS: flash suppressors can reduce recoil significantly, and improve accuracy by limiting barrel harmonics.
now get back to your lego building.
My 410 is a kids gun? Perhaps that explains, like I stated when I wasn't talking to you, why I got it when I was 9. As far as putting a flash suppressor on a 410 shotgun...uh...what the hell are you babbling about? Now when you use your flash suppresser, is it to hide the muzzle flash of your 100 round AK-47 that we all need for "home protection" (nudge nudge wink wink) from the bad guy standing feet away from you in your house or is it to strategically hide your position from the battle hardened squirrel you are hunting with your military grade assault weapons?

You are like a chimp that is trying to mimic what the human folk are doing on here, but nothing really more substantial than that.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27939 Apr 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
My 410 is a kids gun? Perhaps that explains, like I stated when I wasn't talking to you, why I got it when I was 9. As far as putting a flash suppressor on a 410 shotgun...uh...what the hell are you babbling about? Now when you use your flash suppresser, is it to hide the muzzle flash of your 100 round AK-47 that we all need for "home protection" (nudge nudge wink wink) from the bad guy standing feet away from you in your house or is it to strategically hide your position from the battle hardened squirrel you are hunting with your military grade assault weapons?
You are like a chimp that is trying to mimic what the human folk are doing on here, but nothing really more substantial than that.
above is failed spin.

flash suppressors increase accuracy and reduce felt recoil as stated prior.

epic failure describes your fantasy of firearms.

PS: a 2 liter coke bottle suppresses sound and flash......ban them junior.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#27940 Apr 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
My 410 is a kids gun? Perhaps that explains, like I stated when I wasn't talking to you, why I got it when I was 9. As far as putting a flash suppressor on a 410 shotgun...uh...what the hell are you babbling about? Now when you use your flash suppresser, is it to hide the muzzle flash of your 100 round AK-47 that we all need for "home protection" (nudge nudge wink wink) from the bad guy standing feet away from you in your house or is it to strategically hide your position from the battle hardened squirrel you are hunting with your military grade assault weapons?
You are like a chimp that is trying to mimic what the human folk are doing on here, but nothing really more substantial than that.
does a flash suppressor make your 410 more dangerous?

yes or no.

a flash suppressor reduces felt recoil, and increases accuracy in high velocity rifles. It also re-directs flash if you desire.

you want to ban tools, and not the person who utilizes them in crime.

someone suppressed thought from your brain.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#27941 Apr 28, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>I see the daily stupid pill that you take every day has kicked in bright and early. Right along with that selective memory enema.
I see you are up bright and early to look in that mailbox of yours for that welfare check and SNAPS card.

Troll.
Canton

Canton, OH

#27942 Apr 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
does a flash suppressor make your 410 more dangerous?
yes or no.
a flash suppressor reduces felt recoil, and increases accuracy in high velocity rifles. It also re-directs flash if you desire.
you want to ban tools, and not the person who utilizes them in crime.
someone suppressed thought from your brain.
Go back and look at the post that you are mindlessly blabbering about. Nobody was even talking about putting a suppressor on a 410. You turned it into that with your obvious lack of understanding. Dance you stammering clown of a man.

Could every Americans' hunting needs and home protection needs be covered by a .38 revolver and a 12 gauge shot gun? Yes or no?

That stinging you feel in your @ss right now is called Check and Mate. Go overcompensate for your baby dick through with your "vast gun knowledge" with that old lady who washes your socks. Everyone knows a toddler could off you with a .25 caliber. No prior skills necessary.
Canton

Canton, OH

#27943 Apr 28, 2014
Did they take away everyone's guns the last two times you guys cried like little girls about it? No? Not in the least? Can still grab a high capacity military grade assault rifle off the shelf of a local gun shop right now as we speak? You guys are a bunch of gunshow parking lot gloryh0les and know that I say this as an avid gun owner and a shooting competition winner.

Yes, yes...we ALL know Reality Speaks. Your shooting awards are made of gold and your daddy bought them for you....blah blah blah. We've all heard it before. Usually after eating at Taco Bell.
Canton

Canton, OH

#27944 Apr 28, 2014
Could every Americans' hunting needs and home protection needs be covered by a .38 revolver and a 12 gauge shot gun? Yes or no?
Canton

Canton, OH

#27945 Apr 28, 2014
Like I said...Check and Mate.
Canton

Canton, OH

#27946 Apr 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
does a flash suppressor make your 410 more dangerous?
yes or no.
a flash suppressor reduces felt recoil, and increases accuracy in high velocity rifles. It also re-directs flash if you desire.
you want to ban tools, and not the person who utilizes them in crime.
someone suppressed thought from your brain.
I think the REAL question is, what are you so afraid of, little sissy boy? I live in the 2nd most violent small city in America and I walk down the street unarmed and unafraid every day of my life. So why are you hiding like a little bunny under your bed with a pile of assault rifles in your country club sissy boy community? You scared little girl? The few guns I own are to protect my family from gun hoarding rightwing Bible voters like yourself. You know. The ones with all the kookie predictions that never happen.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#27947 Apr 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
Could every Americans' hunting needs and home protection needs be covered by a .38 revolver and a 12 gauge shot gun? Yes or no?
Nope...... at least not in my neighborhood.
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#27948 Apr 28, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Liberal FDR would have considered Reagans Trickle Down Economics nothing more than the Liberals Keynesian Economics...
You have a lot of anger directed at some mythical "liberal" out there. I'm never sure who you are referring to, because you never get into the specifics of who you think they are. I'm assuming that most of the Democratic party would be included, and maybe most Republicans too. Now I find out that you think even Cliven Bundy is a "liberal." Is the word "liberal" just some sort of all-purpose expletive to you, or does it have real meaning?

Why don't you tell us about who you believe to be the "true conservatives"? Tell us what ideas they express that appeal to you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Mason Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Help Support your School and save your pennies 1 hr Susan 1
Arrested protesters face judge Wednesday 1 hr law abider 2
Protesters Pay Bail, Stay in Jail 1 hr law abider 2
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 17 hr tcaud 19,486
Learn To Become A Homeopath With Correspondence... Wed Dr Murray Slotkin 1
Guy at work girl does porn online Tue Whistleblower34 3
Porn Star Haley Sweet (Nov '12) Nov 25 micah mills 2
Mason Dating
Find my Match

Mason People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Mason News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Mason

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:17 pm PST

NBC Sports 9:17PM
Week 13 skill-position injury report — Wednesday
NBC Sports 4:58 AM
Browns teammates said Josh Gordon needed to "find himself"
Bleacher Report11:53 AM
Betting Odds, Prediction for Bengals vs. Bucs
Bleacher Report12:01 PM
Betting Odds, Prediction for Browns vs. Bills
Bleacher Report12:04 PM
Complete Preview for Bucs vs. Bengals