Comments
21 - 26 of 26 Comments Last updated Dec 28, 2013
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Barnsweb

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Dec 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jerry Taylor wrote:
In the middle of the 70th week Jesus was “cut off” leaving 3.5 years remaining. If my math is correct this leads up to the time of the Gentiles, the time the gospel was sent out by Paul to the gentiles, around the time of the stoning of Stephen. If true why do modern day end time preachers say on 69 weeks were fulfilled but we are waiting for the last part in some future 7 year tribulation as if there is some GAP in the Prophesy of Daniel. At that time Daniel was also reflecting upon Jeremiahs words which also do not give a GAP as modern day end timers preach.
Jerry, Peter is the apostle first sent to the Gentiles. The first century Church grew ten times more to the east than it did where Paul went. Paul caused trouble in the Church wherever he went and is the likely Balaam of the NT spoken of by Jesus in Revelation 2 (see II Tim. 4, that all abandoned Paul at his first defense).

If you want to know the truth, understand that Jesus taught 'all things' will be fulfilled before the end. Those are the things prophesied in the OT and in His teachings and the Revelation of Jesus Christ.

If Paul couldn't even tell who gave the Commandments of God to Moses, there is no way that Paul told the truth of the end of all things when he couldn't tell the truth of the beginning either.
Barnsweb

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Dec 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Jerry Taylor wrote:
Catholic hogwash. I guess the RCC made the Old Testament too right. The one Paul told Timothy to use for sound doctrine. Oh and was not Pauls epistles inspired and the other writers of the New inspired as well. I know I know you now will claim your RCC picked whats books are in the New. Again did the RCC pick the Old Testament too or did God have a hand in that? If God had a hand it guess where our New Testament is from? Not the RCC. Your popes have not agreed with one another so don’t even try to put them above others they no better. You Church is the harlot whore that has abused many and deceived many. Im sorry but I don’t want or need your additions to the bible. God worked His way to bring the Old Testament without the RCC and he done the same thing with the New Testament. Can you even read Daniels prophesy and use your own brain or must you allow another flawed so called priest or pope tell you what it means. You can read right. Then you must be able to study right. Then you must be able to draw your own conclusions right. Ooops my bad the pope wont allow you to use your own brain although them popes through history have disagreed too. Get out’a here with your foolish nonsense. You cant even read the bible using your own mind and have the nerve to tell others they are wrong. Man that’s just so funny. You cant even see your own silliness. Telling people they cant know something. You cant tell nobody anything ask your pope.
Jerry, fyi, the Catholic Church is the one who gave us Paul as Scripture. The first century Church of Peter, James and John rejected Paul's writings as heresy.

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Dec 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

BOOBEAR wrote:
Man u pees are a trip on here.
Come join. We need a high end prot on here. You one?
Dave P

Morehead, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Dec 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Barnsweb wrote:
<quoted text>
The first century Church grew ten times more to the east than it did where Paul went. Paul caused trouble in the Church wherever he went and is the likely Balaam of the NT spoken of by Jesus in Revelation 2 (see II Tim. 4, that all abandoned Paul at his first defense).

If Paul couldn't even tell who gave the Commandments of God to Moses, there is no way that Paul told the truth of the end of all things when he couldn't tell the truth of the beginning either.
First church grew more to the east than where Paul went. PROOF anywhere???

Paul caused trouble "in the church" wherever he went. PROOF anywhere???

Likely Baalam of Revelation 2? 2 Timothy? Even though there was over 30 years difference in the writings? How about some PROOF???

Your last paragraph is complete foolishness, imagination, wishful thinking. Lots of charges with no scripture, twisted scripture, and personal feelings motivating the nonsense. This is why I have such a problem with you now. You absolutely make catholicism or even atheism look better.
Dave P

Morehead, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#25
Dec 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Barnsweb wrote:
<quoted text>
Jerry, fyi, the Catholic Church is the one who gave us Paul as Scripture. The first century Church of Peter, James and John rejected Paul's writings as heresy.
Where is the PROOF of this supposed (and that is all it is) rejection of Paul's writings?
William

Bulls Gap, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#26
Dec 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dave P wrote:
<quoted text>
Where is the PROOF of this supposed (and that is all it is) rejection of Paul's writings?
The Pharisees made up lies against Jesus because they hated him for preaching something that threatened their precious religion.

Same thing here.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Martinsville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Martinsville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Martinsville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Martinsville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••