how could you possibly assume Peter was not baptized? Look at Luk 7:29-30... is this how you view Peter? How could one group be condemned for rejecting baptism and Peter be accepted without it.<quoted text>
Saul was baptized but there is no record of the other apostles being baptized. Peter never said he was baptized. If Peter wasn't baptized then it must not be crucial for salvation.
They followed Jesus. That seems to be enough for salvation.
I am sorry but I see why you don't sign your name to your comments